Pittsfield City Council Briefs: Bianchi Joins PEDA

By Joe DurwinSpecial to iBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Mayor Daniel L. Bianchi told the City Council at its meeting Tuesday that he would join the board of the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority.

Bianchi had said throughout the mayoral campaign last year that he would appoint himself to the board, in contrast to his opponent, Peter Marchetti, whom he defeated in November.

The quasi-public agency was established to oversee and develop the former General Electric property now known as the William Stanley Business Park. PEDA has become a topic of intense discussion since the December announcement of a proposed retail development on the property.

The mayor will replace Peter Fruet, who is the current neighborhood representative, on the board. The mayor told the council there were a "couple of options" for the possibility of bringing new members onto the board in the near future. 

"There are some spots that are becoming available on the board," Bianchi hinted. "What I'm planning on doing in the next month is to apply to the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives for an additional two more spots on there. That takes a legislative change. I'm hoping to do that in pretty short order."

Bianchi said he had spoken to the Berkshire delegation and didn't foresee much obstacle to the proposed additions.

► Paula King, chairman of the Board of Assessors, offered a presentation on the assessment of vacant lots. 

King explained the process by which properties are assessed and re-evaluated every three years. 

During the review process, King said, "It was strongly recommended, by the Department of Revenue, to remove undocumented factors from developable and potentially developable vacant lots."

King said a period of public disclosure took place during which the information was available online and taxpayers had an opportunity to view the proposed values.

Ward 6 Councilor John Krol expressed concerns he'd heard from constituents about unexpected, and sometimes drastic changes in tax burden to some property owners under the re-evaluation

"There were some cases where we had property value going something like $5,500 to $55,000, and that's a major hit on the the tax bill, so it definitely is something that ought to be a concern," he said.

If individuals feel they have cause to contest the evaluation of their vacant lots, such as documentation that a piece of property is not buildable land, they should present that to the tax assessor's office immediately.

"They need to be sure to file for an abatement by Feb. 1," said King. "They will need to provide as much information as possible ... [and] defend what they think their value should be."

Paperwork is available for free online or for a 50 cent fee at City Hall.

► The city will retain attorney Richard M. Dohoney to represent it in the ongoing litigation brought by Spectrum Health over permitting for a methadone clinic.

Newly appointed City Solicitor Kathleen Degnan explained that because of the transition, and because Dohoney is already well into litigation on this case, "it makes sense" to retain him. A cap of $5,000 has been established for these services, and if the Spectrum Health suit is not fully litigated by the time his services reach that cap, the solicitor's office will take over representation.

Councilor Churchill Cotton asked if there were any other cases that the city will require Dohoney's assistance on. Degnan said that all other matters she was aware of would be handled by herself, or newly appointed Assistant City Solicitor Darren Lee.

Updated with PEDA brief at 4:05 p.m., Jan. 25, 2012.


Tags: assessment,   PEDA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.

Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.

These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.

For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.

We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.

Scott McGowan
Williamstown Mass.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories