Pittsfield Settles Lawsuit Over Firefighter Promotion

Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city has reached an agreement with the U.S. Justice Department over allegations it failed to promote a Navy reservist and Pittsfield firefighter, and by retaliating against him after he invoked his rights.

According to the Justice Department, the city will promote firefighter Jeffrey Rawson to lieutenant retroactive to September 2010 and provide him with more than $22,000 in back pay, pension contributions and interest.

The Justice Department's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleges that the city violated Rawson's rights by passing him over for promotion to lieutenant in the Pittsfield Fire Department because of his military service obligations. In 2009, Rawson took a promotional exam for lieutenant.

Based on the results of the examination, Rawson was ranked second on the promotional list. In July 2010, the city informed Rawson that he was being skipped for promotion and that a firefighter ranked lower on the promotional list was instead being promoted to lieutenant. The lower-ranked firefighter was promoted in September 2010.

The lawsuit further alleged that, after Rawson filed a USERRA complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor's Veterans Employment and Training Service, the city retaliated against him by refusing to reinstate him to the list of firefighters eligible to serve as an acting lieutenant.


The terms of the settlement, embodied in a consent decree that has been submitted for approval to the federal district court, further mandates the city to provide training on the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 to city department heads and supervisors on the rights and obligations of covered employees and their employers.

"Our military servicemembers sacrifice tremendously to serve our country," said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division. "This settlement demonstrates our vigilant protection of the employment opportunities of our servicemembers, and our commitment to vigorous enforcement of the laws that protect them."

Source article from http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/April/12-crt-507.html.

Tags: DOJ,   firefighter,   lawsuit,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Officials: Unlimited Trash Not Sustainable, Toters Offer Cost-Savings

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Unlimited trash pickup is not sustainable and will lead to higher taxes, city officials say.

Mayor Peter Marchetti began public outreach on Monday on the proposed five-year contract with Casella Waste Management for solid waste and recyclables. Older residents packed into the Ralph J. Froio Senior Center for the first of three community meetings.

On the table is a move to automated pickup utilizing 48-gallon toters, which would be at no cost to residents unless they require additional toters and would save the city $80,000 per year.

The goal is to execute a contract by July 1, the start of the fiscal year.

"Trash collection is not free. You're already paying for it as part of your taxes that you pay. In this administration, in this proposal there is no 'I'm looking to create a trash tax,''' Marchetti said, explaining that trash pickup for fiscal year 2025 is around $5.1 million and has doubled since he first served on the council in 2002.

"So we need to find a way to stem the cost of trash."

Some of the seniors praised the new plan while others had concerns, asking questions like "What is going to happen to the trash cans we have now?" "What if I live in rural Pittsfield and have a long driveway?" and "What happens if my toter is stolen?"

"I've lived in a lot of other places and know this is a big innovation that is taking place over the last 20,30 years," one resident said. "It's worked in most places. It's much better than throwing bags of garbage on the side of the road."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories