Williamstown Residents Push ZBA To Take Up Biker Rally

By Stephen DravisSpecial to iBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story

Residents of the Hopper Road area wanted to continue discussion of the proposed 'Hogs on the Farm' event after the ZBA meeting ended.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The most heated discussion at Thursday's meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals came after the gavel fell to end it.

More than a dozen residents of the Hopper Road neighborhood attended the session anticipating a public hearing on an application for a camping permit for the planned Aug. 17-19 Hogs on the Farm motorcycle rally.

But the applicant, Charles "Rusty" Ransford, withdrew his application. There was no hearing, the meeting was over 24 minutes after it started. But many in the crowd wanted to know why the ZBA was unable to take testimony on the issue in light of the fact that Ransford continues to say he will welcome anyone who shows up on his land to camp there free of charge on the mid-August weekend.

"What about the pollution? What about the noise? What is our only recourse?" Robert Hatton of Potter Road asked board members from the back of the room after the meeting had adjourned.

ZBA Chairman Andrew Hoar and board member David Levine explained that there was no reason for the board to consider the event because it had no active applications before it.

"It's a moot point," Hoar said. "Without a petition before the board, there is nothing for this board to act on."

"Town boards have certain defined responsibilities," said Levine.

A month ago, Ransford and the Snowford Foundation were pursuing applications before the town's Selectmen and ZBA for an entertainment license and camping permit, respectively.

Those applications began after the Selectmen, in consultation with Town Counsel Joel Bard, told Ransford he needed to seek permits to hold what at the time was billed as a fundraiser for U.S. military veterans with an advertised admission fee of $50.

Ransford at first said he would pursue all the permits but on July 6, he sent a letter notifying the town he would not because the Snowford Foundation had dropped its support.

On Thursday, he asked the ZBA to allow him to withdraw the application he had before that panel.

"There's been some controversy, and the (Snowford Foundation) board wanted to avoid controversy," Ransford said. According to filings with the secretary of state's office, the foundation was established in May with directors Ransford, Angela and Darlene Fagley, and Thomas Snow.

The problem for many in the neighborhood is that while Ransford is not pursuing any permitting for the event, he still is inviting anyone who wants to attend to do so free of charge.

And it is that lack of an admission charge that changes the equation.

Hoar read a portion of a letter the town received from Bard clarifying that his initial opinions about what permits Hogs on the Farm would need were based on the premise that it would be a fee-based fundraiser and, therefore, a commercial enterprise.

Now that Ransford is not charging admission, there is nothing to prevent him from welcoming anyone who wants to stay on his farm for "primitive camping."

Ransford noted in his July 6 letter and again on Thursday in discussion with the ZBA that the event has been heavily advertised, and he cannot control who may have seen the publicity. Rather than anger anyone who arrives at his property on Aug. 17, he plans to make the land available to anyone who wants to camp.

"I would expect as few as 10 or 12 people," Ransford said. "It may be as many as 100, but I really don't think it will be that many."

The Facebook page for the Hogs on the Farm event gives the appearance that all systems are go for the event.

As of Thursday evening, the page still had a post dated July 2 that read:

"Due to events, unforeseen, we have made some changes for this year. There will be a free-will donation at the door. This is our first year and we are still feeling things out. If we get a pretty good turn-out, we hope to have something a little bigger next year. There has been much opposition, but we aren't going to give up. It is not in a biker's nature! Hope to see ya there!"

Likewise, a detailed listing for the event (without any reference to an admission charge or donation) still appears on the website www.bikerplaza.com as of Thursday evening.


Attorney Donald Dubendorf convinced the board that his clients, the Baers, did not need a variance for renovations.
Immediately after the board on Thursday unanimously accepted Ransford's request to withdraw the application, he left the meeting room. With nothing else on its agenda, the panel voted to adjourn, eliciting questions from several of those in attendance. Many of the residents stayed in the meeting room after session closed, clustered in smaller groups and wondering what might come next.

One thing that will not come next is a new application for a camping permit. Town Planner Andrew Groff, who advises the ZBA, said there was no way Ransford could resubmit another application to the board in time to have approval in place before the Aug. 17 event. The board's next scheduled meeting is Aug. 16.

The only other item on the ZBA's agenda Thursday was a request by Bradford and Pamela Baer to overturn a decision by the town's Office of Inspection Services that the Baers needed a variance to renovate a non-conforming single-family home at 23 McCauley Lane.

The Baers were represented by Williamstown attorney Donald Dubendorf, who persuaded the board that since the planned renovation was not going to expand the structure or intensify the non-compliance, the couple could make the changes as a matter of right, without the need for a variance.

Before calling a vote that ultimately went 4-0 in favor of the Baers, Hoar paused and addressed the near-capacity crowd.

"Is anyone (else) here to speak for or against this motion?" Hoar asked.

After hearing nothing, he deadpanned, "I didn't think so."

Tags: biker rally,   camping,   permitting,   Ransford,   ZBA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories