Waning Bossidy Fund Sparks Calls For Pittsfield Parks Plan

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

The Parks Commission turned down one Bossidy Fund request but approved a second significantly reduced one.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Two requests for allocations from the city's special athletic fields fund sparked calls at Tuesday's Parks Commission meeting for more aggressive action on long-term parks maintenance.

The commission voted to table a request for $3,000 in "Bossidy Bucks" funding for materials to maintain the Babe Ruth ballfield until it can work out a long-term maintenance plan with city government.

The Bossidy Bucks fund was established in 2001 from a $1 millon donation by Larry Bossidy, former GE and Honeywell executive, for the ongoing upkeep of city athletic fields. In light of this and more substantial recent requests, Parks Commission members and others in the community have grown concerned about the distribution of the remaining amount, which totals just a little over $80,000.

James Conant of the Babe Ruth League said this assistance was important to close recent losses of revenue and protect the larger investment in the Elm Street neighborhood playing field. Deming Field was renovated in 2007, using a $120,000 allocation from the same Bossidy account.

Conant referred to the apparent failure to resolve a venue for the annual Gillette carnival, which benefits the league, as a "crippling financial blow," necessitating the request for Bossidy funds to meet maintenance needs through the next season. While a new financial partner is hoped for, Conant admitted there was as yet no plan in place for the continued maintenance needed to keep the field from deteriorating.

"We just don't have any answers," said Conant. "I could come here again next year and have to ask for the same thing. I just don't know. I hope not."

Without such upkeep, however, Conant feared deterioration of the site would grow over time. "Then really, the entire concept of that new field being built will be lost." 

Chairman Dr. John Herman said the mayor, City Council, and Department of Community Development "need to come up with a plan" about park upkeep.

"It's our fault, too, we haven't been in front of them" said Herman, "We should've been in front of them for the last five years."

Among the possible approaches discussed was the introduction of user fees for non-city operated programs such as the youth sports leagues, though commission members and parks staff agreed this is would be new territory for Pittsfield, and could become a tricky issue.

In the meantime, Commissioner Anthony DiMartino said it was important to get financial reports from the leagues and assess what their actual annual material costs in maintaining these sites are in order to inform planning efforts.


The commission did approve a $15,000 allocation from the Bossidy fund, however, toward replacing  lights at the softball complex at Gerald S. Doyle Memorial Park with a new state-of-the-art system.  Advocates for the girls softball league say the new lights are a crucial investment that will pay dividends in the economic impact when Pittsfield hosts the Girls Softball World Series in July 2013 and future years.

The Parks Commission tabled the league's request last month for $45,000, expressing reservations about such a sizable allotment of the dwindling fund and suggesting the group seek additional funding streams. Softball Commissioner James Stimpson reported that a third of that $45,000 figure had since been secured from a "community source," and he had met with the mayor about obtaining $15,000 in city funds in some form out of the current year's budget.


The Parks Commission is hoping for a long-term maintenance plan to keep up the city's parks in light the diminishing Bossidy Fund.
"I feel extremely comfortable after that meeting, that it's happening," Stimpson told the commission.  "How, I'm not sure, but I will let the politics roll and sit and wait for the check."

Stimpson said informal estimates of the economic impact of the annual tournament could amount to as much as half a million a year in lodging and other expenditures by around 600 visiting participants. 

"Fifteen thousand is a lot easier to swallow than $45,000," expressed Herman, who favored approving this request over the smaller Deming allocation because it is a one-time project, and not an ongoing need that will have to be met.

Commission member Clifford Nilan concurred, but asked for an amendment barring any future requests for the Doyle complex, since it has received $80,000 in previous allocations from the Bossidy fund.

Distribution of Bossidy Bucks have proved controversial several times. Bossidy had originally proposed the money toward a professional baseball stadium that voters shot down. Just months after the donation was made, more than $120,000 of it was spent on trucks and snow plowing equipment, causing splits between city councilors when the issue re-emerged in late 2007. Issues of equity between the various parks and neighborhoods have also provoked heated debate within the Parks Commission several times in recent years.

With more than 90 percent of the fund now spent, the Parks Commission is seeking a long-term plan for maintaining the large construction projects that were undertaken with these funds over the past decade, and looking to city government for guidance in the discussion. 

"I think it's incumbent on us to look at what other communities are doing, and to come up with a fair and equitable plan of action here. We can't simply rely on operating budgets, or Bossidy, or volunteers," James McGrath, the city's parks and open spaces manager, told the commission. "We need to get to a certain level where we're maintaining our fields, and directing our resources appropriately. This is a tricky game here."

Tags: ballfield,   parks,   parks & rec,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Planners Hold Public Hearing on Tiny Homes Bylaw

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing last week on a bylaw for mobile accessory dwelling units (ADU) that will be brought before a special town meeting.

For nearly two years, Amy Turnbull has been trying to amend the current ADU bylaws to allow mobile tiny homes.  

A movable tiny home is defined as a unit under 400 square feet that meets all of someone's daily needs, including sanitation, cooking, and other facilities, and which is also mobile. Most homes considered "tiny" are built on a trailer so they can be towed.

Her proposal defines a movable tiny house as a "residential property with an existing primary house, intended for year-round living," and outlines eight conditions for approval.

Among these conditions: the unit must adhere to accessory dwelling unit regulations, undergo site plan review, be licensed and registered with the state Registry of Motor Vehicles, have approved energy, water, and wastewater systems, and comply with American National Standards Institute 119.5 and National Fire Protection Association 1192 safety requirements.

Additionally, the unit must be certified for ANSI or NFPA compliance by a manufacturer or third-party inspector, including adherence to Appendix Q and the International Residential Code's structural guidelines and energy efficiency standards. The tiny house cannot move under its own power, and its undercarriage, wheels, axles, tongue, and hitch must be concealed from view. Wheels and leveling or support jacks are required to rest on a level gravel or paved surface.

Turnbull has gotten enough signatures for her petition to amend the current bylaws to add her definition of the mobile ADUs. Last Wednesday, the board held a public hearing on the petitions, which will be voted on at a special meeting.

Turnbull says she has two reasons for wanting to add this to the town's bylaws: aging in place and affordable housing.

"We need a variety of housing types in Dalton, and that we also need to address the idea that you know nearly 30 percent of our population by 2035 is going to be over 65 years old, and it's problematic because  ... there's not enough choice for these people to to age in place,"she said. "What movable tiny houses does, is it provides a less restrictive ADU. It's much cheaper to place, and it's easier to place, less time consuming. And what it offers to people is it offers people who are owners a place for their children to come and live, or a caregiver to come and live, or for the people who own their own house to come and live while they rent out their maybe their three bedroom home to a new family who wants to attend to Craneville simultaneously."

She said people need to move away from calling and treating the tiny homes as though they are trailers, as one former Planning Board member has voiced opinions on.

"That is an opinion, and I think we need to get over that, because I want to say that these are foundation homes, and that the chassis is a foundation, and it's a stick-built home on a chassis, and in very many ways it's like a modular house. I think we will not be surprised in the next 10 years if we see the market turn around and start to make smaller, tiny modular homes, but that is not the case right now, and we have a dire need for affordable housing," she said.

At a former Fire District meeting the Water Department drafted regulations for water hook-ups for these types of homes. The superintendent sent a letter to the Planning Board to be read at the meeting stating it will not be a hindrance for sewer system connection.

"The Department of Public Works does not feel that mobile ADUs will be an issue with the town sewer system. The homeowners will be responsible for any issues outside of the sewer main and connect and responsible for connecting in, so that would address any permits, fees, or anything like that would be added to that," the letter states. 

"The Water Department, as we've stated previous, and as you stated, the water department has come up with their own set of SOPs, standard operating procedures, for hooking up a an adu and a mobile adu, which will then have to meet winterization and all those, but they've laid out a plan for that, that they have, so I'd like to point that out," board Chair Robert Collins said.

One concern was raised that if someone can have a mobile ADU could they also have another tiny home on their property, including the main house. That situation is not likely, said Turnbull, as it would cost a considerable amount of money. Town Manager Eric Anderson also stated that in his former community when they adopted similar laws their first one wasn’t put in until a couple years later and then maybe one a year.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories