image description
The Affordable Housing Committee is looking at a portion of the 30-acre former Lowry Farm for possible development.

Williamstown Affordable Housing Group Inquire About Conserved Lands

By Stephen DravisSpecial to iBerkshires
Print Story | Email Story

A portion of the 139-acre Burbank property in Williamstown is seen in this image pulled from a 1998 study by four Williams College students titled 'Management Plans for Conservation Commission Lands.'
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Affordable Housing Committee on Tuesday night addressed the elephant in the room: Not everyone shares the committee members' passion for their cause.

The subject came up as the group discussed whether to start a dialogue with the town's Conservation Commission, a step the housing group ultimately decided to take.

"Either you're going to have to take land out of conservation or use all the money [earmarked for housing] to acquire land and have nothing left to develop it," committee member Bilal Ansari said. "[The latter move] makes no fiscal sense."

His colleague Cheryl Shanks had a sobering response.

"It makes sense if you don't want affordable housing," she said.

Shanks went on to point out that there are people who want to see property values remain high and maintain a sense of exclusivity in the town, and some who see affordable housing projects as a threat to Williamstown's character.

"Let's hope that what happened at the Spruces raised people's consciousness," committee Chairwoman Catherine Yamamoto said, referring to the impact of last year's Tropical Storm Irene in the mobile home park. "We lost 150 homes where our friends and neighbors and family members lived."

Replacing those homes would at least bring Williamstown's affordable housing stock back to its pre-Irene level, but the Affordable Housing Committee has a broader goal: fulfilling the promise of the towns' 2002 Master Plan, which noted "unmet need for affordable starter housing and moderately priced homes."

Yamamoto's group has targeted the former town garage site at 59 Water St. as its most likely site for development, but as she noted last night, it is only 1.3 acres. Even if the site's contaminated soil issues can be addressed and it is developed, it still can not accommodate 150 housing units or more.

So on Wednesday, the Affordable Housing Committee decided to have one of its members, Van Ellett, bring its concerns to the town's Conservation Commission, on which he also serves.

Ellett asked the Affordable Housing Committee for permission to raise the issue at Thursday's meeting of the conservation panel, which, among other things "oversees nine town-owned parcels of land dedicated to conservation and recreation," according to the town's website.

Two of those parcels, the former Burbank and Lowry farms, have been frequently mentioned by the Affordable Housing Committee as potential sites for development, but the committee is yet to make a formal proposal to the "Con Com" to begin the process of taking the land out of conservation.

"Why are we tip-toeing around this issue?" Ansari said. "We want to take parcels from Burbank and Lowry, period. Time is ticking on us now."

Ansari was referring both to the pressing need created by last year's flooding and the prolonged process required to take land out of conservation, a step that requires both approval in Boston and two separate town meeting votes.

Yamamoto agreed that her panel should begin the process of moving some or all of the former farmlands out of conservation to make it available for housing development.

"The more we talk about it, the better," she said.

It was the second meeting in less than a week for the Affordable Housing Committee, which was acting with a sense of urgency to finalize a request for proposals from consultants qualified to assess the town's housing needs.

Yamamoto last week reported to the committee that towns need up-to-date demographic information in hand when they seek federal grant money to advance such projects.

The committee hopes by the end of the week to have a letter with a detailed scope of services for prospective consultants. It hopes to have responses back by early next month, to hire a consultant in December and to have a final report by March 31.

"The purpose of this project is to review current issues and needs with respect to the availability of affordable housing in the Town of Williamstown," the RFP reads. "The study will identify the range of current and projected housing needs facing the town and provide direction for developing strategies to address those needs."

The committee hopes to share the cost of a study with the town's recently constituted Affordable Housing Trust.

This summer, when the panel discussed hiring the more comprehensive services of a development consultant, the committee discussed a maximum budget of $25,000 for that contract.

Tags: affordable housing,   land conservation,   

1 Comments welcomes critical, respectful dialogue; please keep comments focused on the issues and not on personalities. Profanity, obscenity, racist language and harassment are not allowed. iBerkshires reserves the right to ban commenters or remove commenting on any article at any time. Concerns may be sent to

Mount Greylock Committee Hears Concerns About Turf Field Plan

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Rubber infill from the turf field at Weston Field adheres to a reporter's leg after a minute lying down on the surface to take a photo.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee last week declined to slow plans for installing an artificial turf field at the middle-high school but members noted that there is still time to weigh health and environmental concerns before shovels go into the ground.
The full School Committee earlier in the spring authorized the Phase 2 grounds subcommittee to put the turf field out to bid this summer.
Since that time, committee members have heard from a number of residents concerned about studies that have linked "infill" materials in used in turf fields to higher rates of cancer and environmental contamination due to runoff from those fields.
"Some of the chemicals found in crumb rubber are known to cause cancer," a fact sheet from the Toxics Use Reduction Institute at University of Massachusetts at Lowell reads in part. "Because of the large number of chemicals present in the infill, as well as the health effects of individual chemicals, crumb rubber made from recycled tires is the option that likely presents the most concerns related to chemical exposures."
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories