Williamstown Housing Trust Supports Spruces Plan

By Stephen DravisWilliamstown Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

The Affordable Housing Trust, created at town meeting this year, voted to 'take a stand' supporting the town's plans for relocating the residents of the Spruces.

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Trustees of the town's Affordable Housing Trust are on record supporting the idea of using town-owned conservation land to build affordable housing and placing into conservation land that currently is the site of a mobile home park.

At its Wednesday evening meeting, the trust's Board of Trustees voted 4-0 to "support the concept that the Spruces relocation effort be directed toward construction of a neighborhood on the Lowry property."

Chairman Stanley Parese made the motion that the directors of the trust take a public stand on the issue, which has drawn considerable public comment since a plan to acquire the Spruces Mobile Home Park with Federal Emergency Management Agency grant money was unveiled by at a Nov. 13 meeting of the Selectmen

Parese noted that it was by no means clear whether the Affordable Housing Trust would play a formal role in the plan to acquire the 114-acre mobile home park and build replacement housing on 30 acres of town land off Stratton Road. But he thought the panel should nonetheless take a position.

"At some point, we need to take a stand as a committee," Parese said.

None of the four trustees in attendance spoke against the idea of the town pursuing a path that ultimately leads to development of the Lowry property. Though Parese and trustee Tom Sheldon each noted that there is a case to be made for keeping the previously undeveloped and currently farmed Lowry property as conserved land.

"Certainly, there are competing values that will be weighed," Parese said. "There are attributes of the Spruces property that don't exist at the Lowry property. ... As lovely a town as this is, we don't have large public park space.

"Lowry has wonderful attributes treasured by a lot of people, but I hope people don't lose sight of the fact that the Spruces has wondeful attributes."

The Spruces property has a central location and access to the Hoosic River. The same low-lying, riverfront acreage that makes the site prone to flooding could be an advantage if it is turned into conservation land, Parese said.

Before considering the resolution on the Spruces-Lowry initiative, the trustees received an update from Town Manager Peter Fohlin about his Tuesday meeting with Spruces residents.

Fohlin described the residents as attentive, respectful and engaged. He also said his impression was that a large majority of residents were open to learning about the process that might ultimately lead to the availability of alternative affordable housing on Lowry, or elsewhere, and the closure of the Spruces.

"They're willing to learn about the process and embark on this journey with us," said Fohlin, who added that the journey could have many twists.


"The (FEMA) grant could be denied. Morgan Management could sell to someone else who is unknown to us."
 

At some point, we need to take a stand as a committee.

— Chairman Stanley Parese


Fohlin said based on his Tuesday meeting, there did not seem to be a majority of current Spruces residents who were interested in forming a cooperative to buy the property from Rochester, N.Y.,-based Morgan Management.

There were, however, what Fohlin described as a minority of residents who are opposed to any plan that would include closing the park.

"There is a small number whose preference would be to stay as things are," Fohlin said. "There is perhaps a smaller number with very particular personal circumstances that make their decision more painful. In one instance, there is a woman who heavily invested in her home with no hope of recouping the investment."

The Affordable Housing Trust board, which includes the chairman of the town's Affordable Housing Committee, Catherine Yamamoto, also discussed the possibility of the town finding a developer to build affordable housing on two town brownfields properties — the former town garage site on Water Street and the former Photech mill on Cole Avenue.

While both are being pursued by the Affordable Housing Committee, the combined capacity of both sites would not meet the town's needs, particularly in light of last year's devestation at the Spruces from Tropical Storm Irene.

"I would argue that the use of the Lowry property in addition to the use of other town-owned lands will begin to fill the need that exists," Yamamoto said. "It's a big problem, and it needs a big solution."

Parese said that from his perspective, a Photech property that is close to the river and prone to flooding would be an unacceptable alternative for relocating residents whose home was devestated by a flood.

And both Parese and Sheldon noted that the spacious Lowry property offers something the town-owned brownfield sites do not.

"I understand there are a lot of opinions, but for me, what is envisioned as a replacement for the Spruces is a neighborhood, not a building," Sheldon said.

In othe business on Wednesday, the trustees voted to share the cost of a pair of studies with the Affordable Housing Committee. The two panels will together pay $8,500 for a housing needs assessment by a housing consultant; the data in that study will help the town down the line in working with housing developers to obtain grant money. The panels also will share the $5,200 cost of an engineering study on the Lowry property by Guntlow and Associates.

The trustees also approved a request to the Community Preservation Committee for $200,000 of Community Preservation Act funds to be placed into the trust to support affordable housing efforts in the town. The same amount was approved at town meeting in May just after voters approved creation of the trust.


Tags: affordable housing,   affordable housing trust,   Spruces,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Fin Comm Hears from Police Department, Library

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Police Chief Michael Ziemba last week explained to the Finance Committee why an additional full-time officer needs to be added to the fiscal year 2027 budget.
 
The 13 officers in the Williamstown Police Department are insufficient to maintain the department's minimal threshold of two officers on patrol per shift without employing overtime and relying on the chief and the WPD's one detective to cover patrol shifts if an officer is sick or using personal time, Ziemba explained.
 
Some of that coverage was provided in the past by part-time officers, but that option was taken away by the commonwealth's 2020 police reform act.
 
"We lost two part-timers a couple of years ago," Ziemba told the Fin Comm. "They were part-time officers, but they also worked the desk. So between the desk and the cruiser shifts, they were working 40 hours a week, the two of them. We lost them to police reform.
 
"We have seen that we're struggling to cover shifts voluntarily now. We're starting to order people to cover time-off requests. … We don't have the flexibility when somebody goes out for a surgery or sickness or maternity leave to cover that without overtime. An additional position, I believe, would alleviate that."
 
Ziemba bolstered his case by benchmarking the force against like-sized communities in Berkshire County.
 
Adams, for example, has 19 full-time officers and handled 9,241 calls last year with a population just less than 8,000 and a coverage area of 23 square miles, Ziemba said. By comparison, Williamstown has 13 officers, handled 15,000 calls for service, has a population of about 8,000 (including staff and students at Williams College) and covers 46.9 square miles.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories