Williamstown Board Delays Approval on Land Conservation

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Selectwoman Jane Allen on Monday night successfully delayed a decision on a conservation restriction in an attempt to force a townwide discussion of the issue of conserved land.

The Board of Selectmen had on its agenda a request from Dr. Eric White to approve a restriction on three parcels comprising 39 acres of forested land and farmland on Oblong Road.

After White explained the purpose for placing the land in conservation, Allen suggested that the board not make a decision on his request and instead place the question of the restriction on the warrant for May's town meeting.

Only three members of the five-person board were in attendance at Monday's meeting, and it became apparent during discussion that Selectman Ronald Turbin was ready to vote in favor of White's proposal. However, Selectman Thomas Sheldon argued that a question this important should be heard by the full board when it is available, so when Turbin made a motion to approve the request, the motion went unseconded and no vote was held.

Allen made it clear that she was not objecting to White's proposal, per se. But with the town considering whether to take a different parcel out of conservation so that it can be developed for affordable housing, she felt the time was ripe for a full-fledged, townwide consideration of the issue.

"The issue I want to address is much bigger than considering the restriction requested by Dr. White," she said. "In no way does it reflect on any individual request. Open space is important, forest lands are important, farms are important. But they're not more important than other needs of the community.

"As selectmen, with the responsibility of seeing the big picture, I recommend drawing a line in the sand and not approving another conservation restriction until we have a communitywide conversation."

Turbin argued that while such a conversation is important, it was the Selectmen's job to make a decision on the merits of White's request rather than punting the issue over to town meeting.

"I would urge, as an elected body, we vote on it," Turbin said. "It's a parcel of land that I thinnk the conservation restriction was made for. It's historic. It goes back over 200 years. It's an agricultural resource for the community.

"I would urge the select board to vote on this. It's our job."

White outlined a plan that would protect the 39 acres from future development. Nearly half that acreage is wetland, forest property, but 19 acres is in acriculture, and local farmer Bill Stinson of Peace Valley Farm was one of the residents who rose to support White's request.

"It's all very good to have this discussion," Stinson said, referring to Allen's call for a townwide conversation. "This is a landowner with a good heart who wants to do something for the community. Every piece of land I've brought to the community came from there. That land has been valuable to my operation.

"If it was closer to town and on sewer [lines], I'd say bring [the question] to the town. This is a no-brainer in my opinion."

People on opposite sides of the debate over that other parcel of conserved land, the town-owned Lowry Property off Stratton Road, also joined the discussion over White's request — even though the properties are separated by more than three miles.

"It's the responsibility of the select board to vote," said former Selectman Ken Swiatek, a Stratton Road resident who is fighting the plan to take the Lowry Property out of conservation. "Dr. White spent hours and hours going to different town boards, and time is money to some people."

The town election currently is scheduled for May 14, the customary one week before the May 21 town meeting. But state law allows the town by a vote of the Selectmen to consolidate a local election with a state vote, if the two elections fall within 30 days of one another.

Fohlin said the advantages of consolidation would include convenience to the voter, reduced workload for poll workers and cost savings he characterized as "not overwhelmingly persuasive."

Other towns have avoided consolidation because they thought it might create voter confusion, Fohlin said.

But the three selectmen in attendance on Monday decided that the idea was worth exploring. Sheldon noted that he thought combining the local election with a statewide primary could even boost turnout at the former, which would be advantageous.

In other business, the board heard a an annual audit report by representatives from the Pittsfield accounting firm of Adelson, Moynihan and Kowalczyk. In general, Vincent Viscuso and Dave Irwin reported the town's books were in good shape. In response to a question from Sheldon, they said the town's current debt of about $3.4 million is well below the amount it could borrow under state law, which in Williamstown's case would be about $51 million.

Fohlin and the selectmen took advantage of the auditors' report to praise the efforts of town treasurer Janet Sadler and accountant Donna Estes for keeping town revenues where they should be.

Finally, the board set a special town meeting for Tuesday, Feb. 26, at 7 p.m. at Town Hall to consider lifting deed restrictions on two previously town-owned properties: the former site of the Williamstown Youth Center and a parcel near the Department of Public Works that the town sold to Countryside Landscaping (Purple Moon LLC). The former restriction is antiquated; the latter refers to a condition of sale long since met by the buyer, Fohlin explained.

Hancock Town Meeting Votes to Strike Meme Some Found 'Divisive'

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
10:40PM / Monday, May 06, 2024

Hancock town meeting members Monday vote on a routine item early in the meeting.

HANCOCK, Mass. — By the narrowest of margins Monday, the annual town meeting voted to strike from the town report messaging that some residents described as, "inflammatory," "divisive" and unwelcoming to new residents.

 

On a vote of 50-48, the meeting voted to remove the inside cover of the report as it appeared on the town website and in printed versions distributed prior to the meeting and at the elementary school on Monday night.

 

The text, which appeared to be a reprinted version of an Internet meme, read, "You came here from there because you didn't like it there, and now you want to change here to be like there. You are welcome here, only don't try to make here like there. If you want to make here like there, you shouldn't have left there in the first place."

 

After the meeting breezed through the first 18 articles on the town meeting warrant agenda with hardly a dissenting vote, a member rose to ask if it would be unreasonable for the meeting to vote to remove the meme under Article 19, the "other business" article.

 

"No, you cannot remove it," Board of Selectmen Chair Sherman Derby answered immediately.

 

After it became clear that Moderator Brian Fairbank would entertain discussion about the meme, Derby took the floor to address the issue that has been discussed in town circles since the report was printed earlier this spring.

 

"Let me tell you about something that happened this year," Derby said. "The School Department got rid of Christmas. And they got rid of Columbus Day. Now it's Indigenous People's Day.