image description
The Committee on Ordinance and Rules is deliberating on the need for polystyrene ordinance.

Pittsfield Considers Styrofoam Ban

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

Rinaldo Del Gallo addressed the subcommittee in support of a ban on Styrofoam. Del Gallo petitioned the City Council to take up a ban.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council is looking to gather more data as it examines a controversial proposal to prohibit the use of Styrofoam containers in local restaurants.

The council's Committee on Ordinance and Rules voted unanimously Monday to continue deliberation on a petition brought forth by resident Rinaldo Del Gallo earlier this year, following a public hearing in which advocates for and against the ban disputed scientific and other concerns.

"I think it's not going to hurt business, I think that people are scared that shouldn't be," Del Gallo told the committee Monday. "I think most people are for it."

"It looks to be something whose time has come," agreed Mark Miller, who pointed to other communities in Massachusetts (including Amherst, Nantucket, and Great Barrington) and in other states that have adopted similar measures. Most recently, residents of Brookline also voted in favor of a ban at their November town meeting.

According to the Dart Container Co., a national manufacturer of the polystyrene material, though, notions that the material is dangerous or non-recyclable may be misleading.

"Our position is that a ban doesn't do anything," said Martin Fisher, a representative of Dart who urged the city to examine options for recycling rather than prohibiting "a substance that has been in use for many years, is safe, and that in our society is convenient and used for many purposes."

"All we would ask is for an open transparent process in which we are part," said the Dart representative, who complained that the Brookline process had presented little opportunity for the company to offer arguments against the ban. The company has urged against bans in other towns and cities in recent years, and maintains a website in support of the economic benefits and environmental safety of polystyrene.

Jane Winn, a scientist who heads the Berkshire Environmental Action Team, called the synthetic polymer "extremely toxic," citing a 2011 report by the state Department of Health and Human Services that classed the substance as "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen."


"There is no practical way to recycle Styrofoam, especially food-related Styrofoam that pick up greases and oils," said Winn, who said her main concern was with the impact the discarded polystyrene waste has on the local environment.  

"Keep in mind, anything that ends up on the streets is going to end up in the river," Winn told the committee, "Anything that ends up in the river, if we don't get it out, ends up in the ocean."

Even polystyrene that makes it into the trash may pose health risks. Pittsfield incinerates waste products at temperatures of less than 800 degrees, during which as many as 90 different chemical byproducts of the foam may be released into the air.

"I would recommend that whatever your decision is, that it involve an awful lot more research so that we can educate ourselves as a community," said Del Gallo.

Councilor John Krol said it would be good to get more objective scientific evidence. "My threshold is essentially, is it good for the environment, or whether Styrofoam is bad for the environment."

"My gut tells me that we should probably be banning this, that it is a carcinogen" said Councilor Barry Clairmont, who nonetheless concurred with the other councilors that more information was needed. He also wondered whether a local ordinance was the correct way to approach the problem.

Subcommittee Chairwoman Melissa Mazzeo said the purpose of Monday's meeting was to give more of the public the opportunity to weigh in, and to continue to send them information and refer them to additional experts who could speak to the issue.

"We aren't scientists, so we're trying to read what you're sending us," said Mazzeo, "We also need information from the public, too, about getting the scientists here, and helping us figure out how we go forward in getting the information that we want to get."


Tags: ban,   ordinances,   polystyrene ,   Styrofoam,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Suspect Arraigned in 'Horrific' Dragging Case

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

Complete write-thru 3 p.m., Feb. 18.


District Attorney TimothyShugrue says the community has been 'really upset' by this case. 
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A Hancock man has been charged in last week's gruesome dragging that killed 69-year-old William Colbert. 
 
William Gross, 65, was arraigned in Central Berkshire District Court on Wednesday for negligent motor vehicle homicide and leaving the scene. He was arrested Monday after police investigators narrowed down the type of car seen on video at the accident scene. 
 
Police say Colbert had fallen in the road at the Francis Avenue and Linden Street intersection on Feb. 10 before he was struck and dragged nearly four miles. His body was found on West Housatonic Street.
 
Gross is being held on $250,000 cash bail in the Berkshire County House of Corrections. District Attorney Timothy Shugrue said the case will go to a grand jury and foresees additional charges being placed. 
 
"I think this community was really upset by this case," Shugrue said while being interviewed by the press after the morning arraignment.  
 
"It's a horrific case, and the fact that someone was fleeing, and there was someone that was stuck there that could have been treated, and potentially in the initial stages, could have been potentially saved." 
 
Colbert was coming from a house on Francis Avenue about 11:30 on Feb. 10 when fell in the road and had trouble getting up, according to Shugrue. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories