Letters: Just Do the Math

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

The controversy over the removal of conservation land for the purpose of development of affordable housing in Williamstown continues to ratchet up.

Many letters have raised the question of at what cost. Equally as important as being good stewards of conservation land it is likewise as important to be good stewards of those monies that will allow Williamstown to provide the greatest number of affordable, fiscally responsible and ecologically sensible housing to those in need.

The development and infrastructure costs of the conceptual plan to create 41 building lots on the Lowry property would approximate a $45,000 to $50,000 land cost per unit before any vertical construction of housing. That is an infrastructure cost alone approaching $2,000,000.The other vacant town sites, Photech and 59 Water St., along with a third privately owned vacant site referenced to as Cable Mills South, would only require development and infrastructure costs approximating $10,000 to $15,000 land cost per unit before any vertical construction.  


That represents an opportunity to create affordable housing in Williamstown at a ratio of 3 to 1 on these alternative sites. Not to mention the economies of scale in the construction of mixed-use housing as opposed to single family dwellings that will not provide the same long term economies of maintenance, upkeep and energy efficiency. With 35 years of career experience in the acquisition, development and marketing of real estate, including affordable-housing site selection and more specifically land development in no less than 25 different states, myself along with most anyone who has developed property would tell you that those numbers just don't work to the favor of developing the Lowry property when considering other alternatives.

Putting aside all of the controversies spinning around the issues of affordable housing and conservation land, I ask town officials and the public at large, "just do the math."
 

Robert J. Scerbo
Williamstown
April 13, 2013


Tags: affordable housing,   conserved land,   lowry property,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

2025 Year in Sports: Mount Greylock Girls Track Was County's Top Story

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Mount Greylock Regional School did not need an on-campus track to be a powerhouse.
 
But it did not hurt.
 
In the same spring that it held its first meets on its new eight-lane track, Mount Greylock won its second straight Division 6 State Championship to become the story of the year in high school athletics in Berkshire County.
 
"It meant so much this year to be able to come and compete on our own track and have people come here – especially having Western Mass here, it's such a big meet,"Mounties standout Katherine Goss said at the regional meet in late May. "It's nice to win on our own track.”
 
A week later at the other end of the commonwealth, Goss placed second in the triple jump and 100-meter hurdles and third in the 400 hurdles to help the Mounties finish nearly five points ahead of the field.
 
Her teammates Josephine Bay, Cornelia Swabey, Brenna Lopez and Vera de Jong ran circles around the competition with a nine-second win in the 4-by-800 relay. And the Mounties placed second in the 4-by-400 relay while picking up a third-place showing from Nora Lopez in the javelin.
 
Mount Greylock's girls won a third straight Western Mass Championship on the day the school's boys team claimed a fourth straight title. At states, the Mounties finished fifth in Division 6.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories