image description
The Selectmen said a second opinion on enrollment projections would be good for the town.

Lanesborough School Member Considering Ending Union 71

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Barton was granted a total of $5,000 in town funds for research regarding the school district.

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — A School Committee member says the committee is considering pulling out of School Union 71, which it formed with Williamstown.

Chairman Robert Barton asked and received $1,000 from the Board of Selectmen to survey residents about the union. He says the town could save somewhere between $40,000 and $60,000 by opting to leave and signing on with another entity.

"When there is $40,000 to $60,000 on the table, I think it something we have to look at," Barton told the Selectmen on Monday. "It is not just about money either though."

The union was formed in 2008 to share administrative services — including business manager, superintendent and special education coordinator. Lanesborough had dissolved its union with Richmond, New Ashford and Hancock in part because it was shouldering more of the cost. The union joined in an administrative agreement with Mount Greylock Regional School District in 2010; both towns send their students to Mount Greylock.

The Mount Greylock Regional also has been studying the creation of a K-12 school district.

Barton says the school could possibly be better served by joining with another district or union instead.

"This is a big decision for the town but because of the law, it is made just by our three-member board," Barton said.

He will use the town money to mail surveys to residents to gauge their feelings about the district. He said while the school is performing well academically, he believes the town and the school could receive better service with another district. He said he also compared per-student cost of administration to other districts and Lanesborough is paying much more with the union agreement.

Barton has told Mount Greylock officials in the past that the town would consider pulling out of the tri-district altogether — thus avoiding the cost of building or renovating the high school. But, Lanesborough Selectmen were quick to say Barton did not represent the town in saying so.

Barton was also granted an additional $4,000 in town funds to commission a separate enrollment forecast than the one Mount Greylock Regional High School will be doing as part of the school building process.

Barton told the Selectmen that he has seen various projections and they all have drastically different numbers. He is looking to hire a consultant to not only update previous studies but also compare them.



"As you look at these different studies, you will see differences," Barton said.

Selectmen Chairman John Goerlach said that while it appears redundant, those enrollment numbers can make a big difference in the cost to build or renovate the high school.

"I'd like to see a second or third opinion," he said.

Also regarding the school, Lanesborough Youth Basketball President Timothy Sorrell asked the board to support him in an argument with Mount Greylock Regional School officials.

Sorrell said the school is now charging the Greylock Youth Travel Basketball team, which is comprised of Williamstown and Lanesborough students, including those who attend the middle school at Mount Greylock, $800 to use the gym.

"We are trying to level fund and I'm getting hit with a bill of $400," Sorrell told the Selectmen, adding that the money comes out of the budget line for the Lanesborough Recreation Committee, which is is also a member. "I don't understand why we have to pay a fee to use our own school."

Sorrell says he feels the fee is "excessive" because the league uses the gym during the week, cleans up after it leaves and offers a program for students attending there.

He added the football program is also seeing a new fee of $200 to use the practice fields at the school.

The Selectmen approved sending a letter in support of the Sorrell's contention of the fees.

Editor's note: We have changed the headline from "committee" to "member" because it appears Mr. Barton is seeking studies that other committee members say have not been discussed at their meetings.


Tags: elementary schools,   MGRHS,   school district,   school union,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories