Williamstown Fire District Trying Out Web App

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
The Prudential Committee is exploring how to reduce the cost of false alarms.

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Williamstown Fire Department is trying out new technology officials hope will help firefighters stay connected.

At December's monthly meeting of the Prudential Committee, which oversees the fire district, Fire Chief Craig Pedercini told the body about "I Am Responding," an app designed to let emergency services contact their people through phones and allow the first responders to notify the base that they are on their way to the scene of an emergency.

"Essentially, it's a supplement to our pagers," Pedercini said. "What it would do is when the dispatcher puts out tones and a message for a call, the guys who do have cell phones — smart phones or regular phones — will get a text message that we have a call, and it might say motor vehicle accident or structure fire.

"The idea is to catch people who might be at Walmart in North Adams or down at the mall."

Pedercini said the department is conducting a two-month free trial of the service, which would cost $600 for three years or $800 for five years if the district decides to keep it.

He said that the I Am Responding app is becoming increasingly popular around the commonwealth. Locally, it is in use in Dalton, Lanesborough and Stamford, Vt., Pedercini said.

"A number of the departments I've talked to are doing it, and they say it works well," he said. "I'm just not a techie guy."

The three-person Prudential Committee gave its blessing to the initiative.



"The idea is, with the problems we're having with portables receiving [pages] at this point in time, this fills in that gap," committee member Ed Briggs said. "It makes sense."

Chief Craig Perdercini received permission to try out an app that alerts firefighters to calls.

In other business at the Dec. 17 meeting, the committee discussed efforts to accommodate a Church Street resident who complained about excessive light from a street lamp in front of her residence.

The fire district — which is responsible for street lights in town — did ask the utility company to swap out the bulb once already, but the resident in question did not notice an improvement, Pedercini said.

The committee authorized him to take the next step and ask to try a lower wattage bulb, reducing from the 100-watt bulb there now to a 50-watt unit.

The committee also began a conversation about the high cost of false alarms and what the district could do to pass that cost on to residents and businesses that are the sources of repeated false alarms.

Pedercini noted that the town bylaw adopted by 2004's annual town meeting allows the town to fine burglar alarm users $100 per false alarm for their third and fourth false alarm in a calendar year starting July 1 and to fine them $300 and revoke their alarm license after the fifth offense.

The district - a separate governmental entity apart from town government - would need to adopt its own rule, as the town law specifically deals with signals "designed to discourage crime."

Committee member Ed McGowan told his colleagues that while discouraging false alarms is important, the district also wants to be careful that it not encourage people to pull their alarm systems altogether.


Tags: apps,   firefighters,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories