Williamstown Voters to Shoppers: Bring Your Own Bag

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Selectmen Thomas Sheldon, Jane Patton and Ronald Turbin vote for the anti-plastic bag bylaw. Selectmen Hugh Daley and Andrew Hogeland voted with the minority of town voters against the ban, urging more opportunity for community input.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Town meeting on Tuesday evening passed bylaws to ban the distribution of single-use plastic bags and polystyrene food containers at retail establishments.
 
By a vote of 205-81, town voters passed Article 41 on the annual town meeting warrant that called for the ban on single-use bags and a mandatory fee of 10 cents per paper bag distributed by local retailers.
 
Voters then passed a companion bylaw aimed at polystyrene packages by a voice vote.
 
But first, town voters rejected a proposal by the Board of Selectmen to refer both of the proposed bylaws to committee.
 
That proposal generated the closest votes of the nearly three-hour meeting.
 
On the first bylaw to come up, the plastic bag ban, the motion to refer to committee was defeated, 166-128, after the chairman of the Board of Selectmen, Ronald Turbin, announced that he had changed his mind on the plan to study the bylaws further and was throwing his support behind passage at town meeting.
 
On the polystyrene ban, the motion to send to committee was voted down, 176-94.
 
The Board of Selectmen split 3-2 on the final vote on the bag bylaw. Andrew Hogeland and Hugh Daley voted against its passage; Turbin, Thomas Sheldon and Jane Patton voted with the majority in favor of passage.
 
Both bylaws, which were drafted by an ad hoc committee of concerned citizens, were modified on the floor of town meeting.
 
After introducing the legislation, the group's spokesman, Brad Verter, introduced a long list of amendments — the most significant of which struck language from the plastic bag bylaw allowing criminal prosecution of violations (similar language was later cut from the polystyrene bylaw).
 
The litany of amendments prompted resident Harry Montgomery to comment from the floor that the bylaw "wasn't ready for prime time."
 
That impression did concern Verter as the debate wore on.
 
"I [suggested the amendments] because one of the Selectmen who was opposed to the bylaw said that these were some of the things that were his concerns about it," Verter said. "I wanted to address as many of his concerns as possible.
 
"But I was afraid that it might give a signal to the voters that, as [Montgomery] said, it wasn't 'ready for prime time.' The reason for it was the law was an amalgamation of the best language from other laws. They used other terms, and my proofreading skills are not as strong as I hoped."
 
In the end, Verter was gratified with the strong response from the 324 voters who checked in to the annual town meeting (7 percent of the 4,581 registered voters).
 
"I thought it was a very good meeting in that both sides had a chance to express their best case, and I think the voters' decision is a clear mandate that we want our community to go forward with these two bylaws," he said. "I think it's very exciting for not only the Town of Williamstown but for the Berkshires and the state of Massachusetts."
 
Both Daley and Hogeland spoke from the floor to advocate in favor of taking time to develop stronger bylaws in committee.
 
"The Selectmen have gone on record supporting the goal and intent of the article," he said in discussing the bag ban. "We're not here to vote on good intentions. We're here to vote on the letter of the law.
 
"We should demand that our bylaws are written in open and posted meetings with the opportunity for participation from all citizens."
 
Daley said the community organizing meetings held by Verter's group are "not equivalent to a Selectmen's meeting or a zoning law meeting where the Open Meeting Law is enforced and records are kept."
 
"That procedure was put in place to hold elected officials accountable to our citizens," Daley continued.
 
And Daley and Hogeland were not the only ones arguing from the floor against passage.
 
"If we really want to affect the contents of our landfills, we need a broader capture region," said Anne Skinner, who stressed she was speaking as one citizen, not representing the League of Women Voters. "A statewide ban would be actually very helpful in this respect.
 
"I do recognize the tactic being used here to use support in the towns to put pressure on the Legislature. But with 17 towns out of 351, you have a long way to go on that one."
 
Local businesswoman Amy Bryan objected to the punitive aspects of the law, which would hurt small-business owners, she said.
 
Brad Verter addresses town meeting on the plastic bag bylaw that overwhelmingly passed.
"If my sister-in-law came in and I didn't charge her for a bag — first time a warning, second time $50, third time $100," she said. "I urge you to refer this to the Selectmen to draft a law that would be fairer to the businesses.
 
"I fully support getting rid of plastic, but the law as written doesn't support small businesses in town."
 
Wendy Penner of the town's COOL (Carbon Dioxide Lowering Committee) spoke in favor of the bylaws and specifically addressed one of Bryan's concerns.
 
"I think we can assume it would only be enforced if a business was flagrantly violating the law," Penner said. "If you have a family member [get a bag], I don't think these are cases where people will want to rush in and be punitive."
 
Bag bylaw proponents also emphasize that the the 10-cent per bag fee on paper bags is, by design, not intended to come out of retailers' pockets but to fall directly on consumers.
 
"The goal is to change consumer behavior," Susan Abrams said. "The goal is to encourage people to bring reusable bags. ... When you charge a fee, and they can't get a bag for free, there is more incentive."
 
After the bag bylaw passed by a solid 205-81 majority, Daley took another stab at getting voters to refer the polystyrene bylaw to committee.
 
"There is a dangerous assumption embedded in both these bylaws that costs do not matter," Daley said. "Businesses are extremely cost conscious, and consumers are extremely cost conscious. It is a dangerous assumption that volume will stay the same if you keep increasing prices
 
"The town deserves the opportunity to vote on a bylaw that has been checked by Town Counsel. We're commmitted to doing that."
 
Daley's and Verter's were the only voices heard on the polystyrene question. The motion to send to committee was called immediately after Daley's remark, failing 176-94. Then the main motion passed by a voice vote.
 
In other business on Tuesday, annual town meeting approved the main appropriations in the budget by unanimous voice vote: the $7.1 million town budget, the $5.8 million appropriation to Williamstown Elementary School and the nearly $5 million appropriation to Mount Greylock Regional School.
 
The town also passed a new bylaw governing installation of ground-mounted solar photovoltaics and a series of amendments to the town's sign bylaw aimed at making it less restrictive and friendlier to business.
 
More on Williamstown's annual town meeting to come.

Tags: bag ban,   town meeting 2015,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Friday Front Porch Feature: A Cozy Place to Be

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Are you looking for a move-in ready home close to the downtown area? Then this just might be the house you're looking for.

Our Friday Front Porch is a weekly feature spotlighting attractive homes for sale in Berkshire County. This week, we are showcasing 193 Cold Spring Road.

This 1950 single-family has four bedrooms and two bathrooms. The house is 2,184 square feet on a little less than an acre of land. The price is $469,900.

The house not only comes with a 3.5-car basement garage but also a detached two-car garage with additional storage space above. The house includes the kitchen appliances like the dishwasher, range, and refrigerator, and has a fireplace, screened porch, and back deck. The home is also generator-ready.

We spoke to Suzette Lyons with Burnham and Gold Real Estate, which has the listing.

What do you think makes this property stand out in the current market?

Lyons: Location, location, location!! This property is a short distance from downtown Spring Street. It's nestled conveniently away from the road and provides substantial privacy. Plus, the home has a well-maintained exterior and interior.

What was your first impression when you walked into the home? 

What a gem! The workmanship is lovely and shows the home has been loved. There is an abundance of space with four bedrooms for family or work/home office space.

The opportunities are endless.

Do you know any unique stories about the home or its history? 

The home was built in the mid-1950s by the owner of Yeadon Farm Dairy on the edge of the farm, now the Thornliebank/Buxton Hill neighborhood, with lumber cut from the property.

Along with thick plaster walls and ceilings on the first floor, quality craftsmanship is abundant throughout.

The house has been owned by the same family who built it and the grandson has made every effort to match the original design and style with all of the renovations, including custom-milled natural woodwork for the private second-floor primary bedroom suite. Family pride in ownership is evident in every space of this well-constructed and maintained house now waiting for a new family to call it "home."

What kind of buyer would this home be ideal for? 

This home appeals to many buyers. There are four bedrooms sufficient for a full-time family, singles or second homeowners. Opportunity for in-law suite. Also, ample room for a home/office business. Lots of storage space with 3 1/2 garages and additional storage space above the oversized two-car garage.

Are there any standout design features? 

Lots of personal touches with natural woodwork throughout, freshly painted light colors to maximize natural light, new flooring in several rooms. Spacious four-season room for relaxing or home/office use. Also, offers a beautiful primary suite on the second floor.

What would you say to a buyer trying to imagine their life in this space? 

A peaceful retreat in the woods. Cozy up to the fireplace on winter nights, enjoy the morning coffee on the back porch or the four-season sunroom. Spend the afternoon gardening in your beautiful yard and connecting with nature. A pet-friendly home offering a fenced yard and durable flooring. A family friendly home directly on the school bus routes.

How would you describe the atmosphere or feel of this home? 

The home has a welcoming feel with natural elements offering a place of comfort and belonging.

You can find out more about this house on its listing here.

*Front Porch Feature brings you an exclusive to some of the houses listed on our real estate page every week. Here we take a bit of a deeper dive into a certain house for sale and ask questions so you don't have to.

 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories