Cheshire Passes School Budget, Pipeline Resolution, And Selectmen Membership Increase

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Voters at Monday's annual town meeting approved a resolution opposing the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline and a petition to increase the size of the Board of Selectmen.

CHESHIRE, Mass. – After a near three-hour town meeting, Cheshire passed the entire budget, made a stand against the Kinder Morgan pipeline, voted to start the process of increasing the membership of the Board of Selectmen, and adopted a noise bylaw.

Nearly 170 voters were in attendance to decide the 18-question warrant at Cheshire Elementary School on Monday night.

The Adams-Cheshire Regional School District budget, which requested $2,586,477 from Cheshire and triggers a Proposition 2 1/2 override for $90,000, didn't pass easily.

A motion was made and seconded to cut $380,156 from the district's foundation budget, however, that was knocked down by school officials and supporters.

School Committee Vice Chairwoman Darlene Rodowicz said the district already has one of the lowest per pupil spending in the county and even if the district received the full $480,000 originally requested, it would still remain at the bottom. She said the proposed cut would translate into a $1 million reduction when Adams' share is taken into account.

"You cannot expect a good education if you continue to cut, and I can't imagine what this community will look like if you don't think education for our children isn't a priority," Rodowicz said. "We have children that need us to be thoughtful, accountable, and mature adults and to slash the $380,000 out of the foundation budget ... is irresponsible."

Resident Gary Trudeau, who made the motion, said he found numbers on the state Department of Education's website that show Adams-Cheshire overspends on its educational salaries. He also referred to dropping scores in math, English, science, as well as standardized state testing in the district.

"That is just ridiculous for us to be spending an extra million a year on salaries for educators, which is over our budget," Trudeau said. "At some point we have to put an end to this wasteful spending and start getting people on track."

He said one of his children has had a difficult time getting into certain colleges because of Adams-Cheshire's record and cutting the budget would "send a strong message to the schools to start straightening itself out."

Superintendent Kristen Gordon responded that more than 50 percent of the children Adams-Cheshire receives in kindergarten are well below grade level and are "starting in a hole." She said there is direct correlation between how much communities spend per pupil and student success.

"If you keep making us the lowest per pupil in all of Berkshire County, with class sizes of 26 and 28, and a low-income population of over 60 percent of our elementary school students, these are the scores you are going to continue to get," Gordon said.

"I personally have never been so insulted for the district and these hard-working teachers in all of my career with those comment you have just made," she said.

Voters hold up yellow cards to indicate their vote.

She said lower per-pupil spending makes it difficult to share resources with other schools and nullifies any plans to improve the district because they do not have the money to implement new programs. She added it will also become more difficult to attract quality educators and keep staff.

Advisory Board Chairman William Craig said cutting more money form the school will be bad for the town and dissuade families from moving in and make it more difficult to sell property.

"If we don't take action to keep the town moving forward we are going to be in a death spiral because people are not going to want to move to the town," Craig said. "We have and we need to support this and move forward."

The override vote will take place by ballot on Monday, June 15, from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the Community Center. If the vote fails, the budget will return to the School Committee for reconsideration. This could translate to 28 cuts in the teaching staff.

The rest of the $5,492,693 budget passed with little opposition except for an increase in the Water Department superintendent from $15,191 to $57,500. This change did not affect the bottom line of $279,484.

Water Department Director Francis Waterman said the Department of Environmental Protection has placed pressure on the part-time staff to include a full-time position.

Residents asked for a clearer job description, the need for the position, and whether there would be enough work to warrant a full-time position.

Waterman said there should be plenty to do and if there is isn't, the employee can help the Department of Public Works. He said it would allow the department to contract out for some services for less.

Town meeting also accepted a non-binding resolution opposing the proposed Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline expected to pass through Cheshire. 

Resident Eileen Quinn, who place the article on the warrant via citizen's petition, said the resolution would state that Cheshire felt the pipeline is a danger to the health and well-being of the town and that the town should focus on green energy. It would align the town with other communities that are against the pipeline, she said.

"This pipeline will threaten the identity of our area that is a community with clean air, land, water, and the beauty and accessibility of our natural landscape," Quinn said.

Some residents opposed the resolution because Cheshire already has a pipeline.

Quinn said the proposed pipeline is 36 inches and much larger than the current one.

"This pipeline moves more gas at a higher pressure and sets us up for a greater risk," she said. "The difference is like a dirt path versus a super highway."

Town meeting passed another citizen's petition article on expanding the Board of Selectmen from three members to five. Voters will have to pass the question again at the next annual town election to implement it.

Some residents felt it would be hard to fill the board because of a lack of interest and it will only add to the budget; others felt the board does not need any more help.

Resident Richard Scholz, who submitted the article, said he felt many people who may be interested do not run because it is difficult to remove current members, who although dedicated, have been there a long time.

"The comment saying that nobody in town wants to run for this position is a little like saying nobody is swimming across the river and using that as justification to not to build a bridge," Scholz said. "You will never be able to decide how many people are going to cross the bridge by having everyone swim across the river."

He said he felt five members would add a diversity in opinion that sometimes disappears when selectmen have been working together for years.

Eileen Quinn explains the difference between the current natural gas line and the proposed Kinder Morgan one.

Selectman Paul Astorino said 154 towns in the commonwealth have three-member boards and only one with a population less than 3,500 has a five-member board.

He added that Town Hall is simply not big enough to support a larger board and moving to a new location would only cause complications.

Selectwoman Carol Francesconi agreed with Astorino and said she felt a three-member board offers plenty of diversity in opinion.

"I think people are diverse enough and I have had my opinion changed multiple times," she said. "But I think five members is not going to improve the government of this town."

Selectman Robert Ciskowski disagreed and felt more members would create more diversity and put Cheshire in a position to plan more ahead instead of just "reacting to emergencies." He added that residents "deserve better from the select board."

"I think with five members, we will have more turnover on the board, and I think we will have more diversity," he said. "I think we will have more ideas, and I don't think any of those are bad things."

Town meeting also passed a noise bylaw that allows the police or the Board of Selectmen to penalize offenders who make excessive noise that could cause health hazards or affect quality of life. Violators will attend a public hearing before the fine is issued.

Some resident felt the bylaw was too subjective and had no measurable standards to decide what is too loud.

Francesconi said the town never had the ability to punish violators and the Selectmen often receive complaints they cannot do anything about.

Town meeting turned down a citizen's petition article asking to appropriate $25,000 to create a master plan.

Although many agreed the plan would be beneficial, Town Administrator Mark Webber said they simply have no more money to spend and the money cannot be added to the override vote because the ballot is already set.

All other articles on the warrant passed with little or no opposition.


Tags: ACRSD,   Prop 2 1/2,   school budget,   town meeting 2016,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Planners Hold Public Hearing on Tiny Homes Bylaw

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing last week on a bylaw for mobile accessory dwelling units (ADU) that will be brought before a special town meeting.

For nearly two years, Amy Turnbull has been trying to amend the current ADU bylaws to allow mobile tiny homes.  

A movable tiny home is defined as a unit under 400 square feet that meets all of someone's daily needs, including sanitation, cooking, and other facilities, and which is also mobile. Most homes considered "tiny" are built on a trailer so they can be towed.

Her proposal defines a movable tiny house as a "residential property with an existing primary house, intended for year-round living," and outlines eight conditions for approval.

Among these conditions: the unit must adhere to accessory dwelling unit regulations, undergo site plan review, be licensed and registered with the state Registry of Motor Vehicles, have approved energy, water, and wastewater systems, and comply with American National Standards Institute 119.5 and National Fire Protection Association 1192 safety requirements.

Additionally, the unit must be certified for ANSI or NFPA compliance by a manufacturer or third-party inspector, including adherence to Appendix Q and the International Residential Code's structural guidelines and energy efficiency standards. The tiny house cannot move under its own power, and its undercarriage, wheels, axles, tongue, and hitch must be concealed from view. Wheels and leveling or support jacks are required to rest on a level gravel or paved surface.

Turnbull has gotten enough signatures for her petition to amend the current bylaws to add her definition of the mobile ADUs. Last Wednesday, the board held a public hearing on the petitions, which will be voted on at a special meeting.

Turnbull says she has two reasons for wanting to add this to the town's bylaws: aging in place and affordable housing.

"We need a variety of housing types in Dalton, and that we also need to address the idea that you know nearly 30 percent of our population by 2035 is going to be over 65 years old, and it's problematic because  ... there's not enough choice for these people to to age in place,"she said. "What movable tiny houses does, is it provides a less restrictive ADU. It's much cheaper to place, and it's easier to place, less time consuming. And what it offers to people is it offers people who are owners a place for their children to come and live, or a caregiver to come and live, or for the people who own their own house to come and live while they rent out their maybe their three bedroom home to a new family who wants to attend to Craneville simultaneously."

She said people need to move away from calling and treating the tiny homes as though they are trailers, as one former Planning Board member has voiced opinions on.

"That is an opinion, and I think we need to get over that, because I want to say that these are foundation homes, and that the chassis is a foundation, and it's a stick-built home on a chassis, and in very many ways it's like a modular house. I think we will not be surprised in the next 10 years if we see the market turn around and start to make smaller, tiny modular homes, but that is not the case right now, and we have a dire need for affordable housing," she said.

At a former Fire District meeting the Water Department drafted regulations for water hook-ups for these types of homes. The superintendent sent a letter to the Planning Board to be read at the meeting stating it will not be a hindrance for sewer system connection.

"The Department of Public Works does not feel that mobile ADUs will be an issue with the town sewer system. The homeowners will be responsible for any issues outside of the sewer main and connect and responsible for connecting in, so that would address any permits, fees, or anything like that would be added to that," the letter states. 

"The Water Department, as we've stated previous, and as you stated, the water department has come up with their own set of SOPs, standard operating procedures, for hooking up a an adu and a mobile adu, which will then have to meet winterization and all those, but they've laid out a plan for that, that they have, so I'd like to point that out," board Chair Robert Collins said.

One concern was raised that if someone can have a mobile ADU could they also have another tiny home on their property, including the main house. That situation is not likely, said Turnbull, as it would cost a considerable amount of money. Town Manager Eric Anderson also stated that in his former community when they adopted similar laws their first one wasn’t put in until a couple years later and then maybe one a year.

View Full Story

More Cheshire Stories