image description
Williamstown voters voted yes in overwhelming numbers to the Mount Greylock Regional School project.

Mount Greylock School Project Wins Decisive Victory in Williamstown

Staff ReportsPrint Story | Email Story

Mount Greylock school officials eagerly await results on Tuesday.

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved taking on more than $20 million in debt to rebuild and renovate Mount Greylock Regional School.

The finally tally was a decisive 2,226 to 351, with some 84 percent of voters choosing to approve excluding the debt from Proposition 2 1/2 restrictions.

"I was hoping for a resounding yes and we got resounding yes," said Mount Greylock School Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Greene, who was awaiting results with other school officials at Williamstown Elementary School on Tuesday night.

The entire project to renovate and add on to the 50-year-old school is pegged at $64.8 million. After state reimbursement, the district's share of that debt would end up between $31.5 million and $35.3 million. Two-thirds of that district share would be paid by the district's larger town, Williamstown.

Next up for a vote is the other member town, Lanesborough, where the project has been hotly debated over the past year. The Mount Greylock School Committee had urged town officials to schedule the debt exclusion vote for same day to take advantage of the expected turnout for the presidential primary.

Lanesborough rejected that idea, holding an informative session at last week's special town meeting and scheduling a ballot vote for March 15.

A "no" vote in either town would either kill the project or precipitate a revote. But School Committee and School Building Committee members note that a revote would be on the same project, which already has been vetted by Massachusetts School Building Authority.



Mount Greylock building project supporters say the current junior-senior high school is inefficient and faces costly repairs — estimated to cost more than $50 million — that would be borne entirely by the member towns if they opt out of the MSBA program.

"I hope it will encourage people to realize the value of the project," said Greene. "For those undecided, my hope is that they will consider their partner community has chosen to overwhelmingly support this project."

Superintendent Douglas Dias said, "the community heard the message and reaffirmed the value of education."

Turnout in Williamstown was high, with more than 56 percent of registered voters casting ballots by 2 p.m. on Tuesday. Some 210 absentee ballots had also been cast.

"It's been very busy," said Town Clerk Mary Kennedy, who declined to speculate which vote was driving the turnout.  "I think it's a little of both."


Tags: MGRHS school project,   Prop 2 1/2,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Homeowners Facing 7 Percent Hike in Tax Rate

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Property owners will pay nearly a dollar more per $1,000 of assessed value in the current fiscal year under a tax classification proposal that goes to the Select Board on Monday evening.
 
According to a memo prepared by town Assessor Christopher Lamarre, the FY27 tax rate will be $15.16 per $1,000 of property value, an increase of 96 cents, or 6.8 percent, from the $14.20 per $1,000 property owners paid in the fiscal year that ended on June 30.
 
The increase is because of a 9.12 percent hike in the levy based on the budget and fiscal articles approved for FY27 at May's annual town meeting.
 
In FY26, the town collected $21.9 million from property taxes; this year, it needs to collect $24.1 million to pay its bills, a rise of $2.2 million.
 
That is by far the largest hike in the last 10 years — the period covered by data readily available on the town's website. In FY26, levy grew by 5.8 percent, following an eight-year period where the largest jump was 5.52 percent in 2018.
 
At the same time, the town continued to see growth rate in the tax base that does not keep up with rising costs. In FY27, "new growth" is pegged at $18.2 million, yielding just $258,004 in new tax revenue — far below the $2.2 million in needed revenue.
 
The total of taxable property in town in FY27 is $1.6 billion.
 
View Full Story

More Stories