Letter: Support Hogeland for Planning Board

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Anne Hogeland is running for the two-year slot on the Williamstown Planning Board, and there hasn't been a more opportune time than next Tuesday's town election, to vote her on it.

The Planning Board is assigned, by state law, to prepare studies on land use, housing, conservation, and business development, to review zoning bylaw amendments and propose some of its own, and to make its decisions based in community support. We need to elect board members who reason with logic and open-mindedness, who are willing and able to do research and build on their own expertise in the law and town planning, who have a clear sense of their responsibilities to the whole town, and who know how to seek compromise, not win personal battles.

Anne Hogeland fills the bill. After graduating Williams College and Harvard Law School, she clerked for a U.S. District Court judge, and practiced law in Boston, Washington, D.C., and Pittsfield, representing non-profit health-care providers. After returning to Williamstown with her husband and three daughters in the 1970s, Anne immersed herself in community service, including as founder of Adventures in Learning after-school program at the Williamstown Elementary School, co-president of the Mount Greylock High School PTO and chair of the High School Superintendent Search Committee, co-chair and manager of the Williamstown Farmers Market, and member of the local Trustees of Reservations committee and Williamstown Cultural District Partnership.

This list shows the broad range of her community interests, for which she has gained full respect throughout the town, particularly for her intelligence, her openness to listening to people's concerns, her talents in managing, and her ability to engage in thoughtful, collaborative planning.



Her outlook for the future of Williamstown is broad, and persuasively positive and optimistic. She asserted on her Facebook page: "The board should be responsible stewards, sustaining the integrity of our landscape, while fully aware of our changing social and economic realities."

On one issue that sits squarely in the lap of the board — aging and housing, she says, "I have a long standing concern about housing and the elderly in town. I've worked closely with older tenants in New York City facing serious housing challenges, which intersect with health care issues. I agree with the Economic Development Committee that we should remove unnecessary zoning obstacles to a full range of housing, including low and moderately priced, multi-family, retirement, and assisted. We have a lot of work ahead!"

Let's vote Anne Hogeland to the Planning Board and watch her go to work to make the board a positive creative force for this town.

Tela Zasloff
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 


Tags: election 2016,   endorsement,   town elections,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories