image description
The budget was presented to the School Committee on Wednesday night.

Pittsfield Considering Cutting 73.5 Jobs In School Department

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Superintendent Jason McCandless is holding firm on a $500,000 expenditure to change out curriculum materials.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — School Committee member Daniel Elias was at the bank the other day when he ran into two school employees, both of whom could be among the dozens of workers to lose their jobs this upcoming year.
 
"We can't lose sight of the faces that are attached to these numbers," Elias said.
 
Elias is just one vote on the School Committee that was presented a budget on Wednesday which calls for the elimination of 73.5 full-time equivalent positions.
 
Those are 29.4 teachers or 5.1 percent of the district's entire teaching staff. Those are 39.2 paraprofessionals, 15 percent of those currently employed. And those are five districtwide positions, 11 percent of those staff members. 
 
"It's unbelievable. It is bigger than most teaching staffs in Berkshire County," Superintendent Jason McCandless said of the proposed workforce reduction. 
 
But, "This is a pathway for right now to get to the bottom line." 
 
That bottom line is driven by two major factors: health insurance and the city's levy ceiling. Pittsfield is approaching its levy ceiling, or the amount of revenue it can generate from taxation according to state law. The law is intended to limit a government to taxing less than 2.5 percent of all taxable property. It is different from a tax levy limit, which restricts annual growths but can be lifted through an override vote. The ceiling is lower than the levy limit and there is no override. 
 
As the city started the budget planning, the Finance Department determined the increase of new money could be $3.3 million. In February, Blue Cross Blue Shield informed the city that it would be going up 12.9 percent, or $3 million. 
 
"That affects every employee. It is affecting the school employees, the municipal employees, retirees, it is affecting everyone," Mayor Linda Tyer said. "That's $3 million in additional costs just for health insurance."
 
And then the administration started adding up the contractual agreements. The city has employee pay raises, rising utility bills and pension obligations. The contract for garbage collection is increasing.
 
Before any department budget was even considered, the administration saw that it has $3.9 million in bills and just $3.3 million in revenue. That's not including whatever settlement could be coming from negotiations with the police and fire unions or what will happen with the proposed Eversource electric rate increase.
 
"As of today the direction to every department, municipal and school, is level fund. That may not be enough. We may have to go even deeper than that," Tyer said. 
 
"Level fund is actually a cut. One of the increases is related to the contractual obligations we have to our employees. We have a commitment to keep that obligation, that means we have to find reductions in other areas. It is people and programs. Level funding is a reduction and we may have to go deeper than that."
 
For McCandless, level funding means an appropriation from the city of $60,316,338. The School Department, the largest cost sector in the city, has its own contractual obligations. It also saw a $200,000 increase in out-of=district placement for special education services.
 
"We know we need close to $2 million in spending to keep a level service budget," McCandless said. "We have the dread and the knot in the stomach and the angst and everything else that comes with preparing a budget like this."
 
Last year, the schools did see a budget increase but it still led to 16.5 positions being cut: nine from the budget and 7.5 more with the loss of a state kindergarten grant.
 
This year McCandless prepared a budget which calls for 73.5 positions to comply with level funding — the hope is that the positions lost will be through attrition and McCandless has extended the notification period for teachers to take advantage of early retirement benefits. 
 
The cuts include putting the auto body program at Taconic High School on hold until the new school is completed. It ends stipends for department heads in both the middle and high school. It makes cuts to the teen parenting program. It reduces the preschool offerings.The plan also cuts staff from nearly all aspects of school operations.
 
"This still leaves the city underwater," McCandless said. 
 
The numbers of reductions have increased from the first budget draft, which called for 57 position cuts. That plan still needed a .9 percent budget increase over the previous year so it had to be pared back even more. 
 
"We have to come in level and I'm not absolutely convinced that is going to work," McCandless said. 
 
But McCandless is holding his ground on a few things. He is not cutting sports or the arts. And he is standing firm on a $500,000 increase for curriculum development. That half-million is eyed to be used to continue a cycle of replacing materials across all schools. McCandless says teachers are using tools that are outdated and not aligned with standards. 
 
"We know for a fact that it has been years and years and years that we had money set aside to invest in the curriculum," McCandless said. "We have materials that are not well aligned to the tests."
 
McCandless called that "non-negotiable."
 
"We are asking our teachers, we are asking our staff to do incredible hard jobs ... and we are asking them to do it with substandard tools that are not aligned to the test, not aligned to the schools, and not doing us any good," McCandless said. 
 
The United Educators of Pittsfield understands the predicament. President Brendan Sheran said he'll be in contact with McCandless and committee Chairwoman Katherine Yon in the next few days in hopes to save a few jobs and mitigate impacts. But, these deep cuts are becoming a trend happening across the state. 
 
"This is a dire situation for the entire community. It is not just the schools per se, it is the entire community. You have key people, key positions that help educate and inspire kids in every school. We're faced with essentially not being able to raise the funds to maintain the services we have. We are forced to remove some of the things we feel are working really well," Sheran said. 
 
"This is a trend that is going to begin existing more and more in the state because more communities are being constrained by revenue generation."
 
Sheran said there are some areas in the spending plan he disagrees with. He hopes to keep the team leader stipends, he has a few questions about the particular positions being added to the staffing picture, and wonders if the $500,000 for curriculum could be reduced to save some jobs. 
 
"I think there definitely is some disagreements because there are some additions in there and the curriculum number of $500,000, I wonder if we can get away with that being $400,000 this year and maybe save some crucial roles. I really feel some of the positions that really make the middle and high schools tick are those department chairs, the curriculum leaders in their departments, the team leaders who do a lot of work with their teams in the middle schools," Sheran said. 
 
But overall, he said he is happy with the critical thought that is going into crafting a spending plan that will have the best outcome, despite having to make deep reductions in staffing. 
 
"These are challenging times. I'm happy we have some people who are really thoughtful and thinking through this a lot. Of course, there are places we disagree, with additions or cuts, but we don't really have many good options. I hope in the coming days we can come to some solutions and maybe save some jobs and help the kids."
 
Sheran had just testified in front of the Ways and Means Committee last week when he called for the state to perform a foundation budget review, revamp Chapter 70 formulas for school support, and invest in the infrastructure to renovate aging schools. 
 
"It is just a sad situation that we are constrained so much this year and it appears to be for the foreseeable future in those three areas, the materials, the people, and the facilities," Sheran said.
 
It is the state and the federal government that other school officials blame for putting the city is such a difficult position. 
 
Superintendent Jason McCandless released this video explanation of this year's budget situation.
"We've seen major grants that we've relied on for funding and staffing erode over the past several years. And as we all know, getting something done in Boston to help us out here is easier said than done," School Committee member Joshua Cutler said. 
 
McCandless said state support for education hasn't been strong. In prior years, he said the district could see increases of between $1 to $2 million in state aid to help offset inflation and increases. That increase has been reduced to about a quarter of a million.
 
The district has absorbed the cuts to the kindergarten program and the preschool project is being cut by a third this year — and a third next year and a third the following year.
 
"For a state government that says we are all about pre-K, it seems pretty apparent they are not about pre-K in a public school setting. They are about pre-K in a private setting," McCandless said.
 
School Committee member Cynthia Taylor called on Gov. Charlie Baker to reel in the health insurance increases and revamp the way education is funded. She called for "change, equity, and representation" at the state level.
 
Cutler added, "What exacerbates everything right now is the explosion of health insurance costs. And I'm not one who tends to editorialize much on national politics publicly, but while Obamacare has certainly made access to health care more equitable to all, it has not made it more affordable for all and municipalities like ourselves tend to bear the brunt of this cost. A 12 percent increase in health insurance cost across the board is truly the driving factor in our budget process and the city's budget process."
 
The city may be losing student age population, which contributes to the formula for Chapter 70 state aid, but the students with additional needs are growing McCandless said. The state aid is staying stable but more and more students are entering school with greater needs.
 
He said there are two schools with 75 percent of the population considered "economically challenged by the state." He said more than a third of student body in all but one school are economically disadvantaged. 
 
"That's the percentage of students on some type of governmental support program," McCandless said. 
 
The way things are going is not sustainable, McCandless said. The district can't cut 75 positions every year. What this budget does include is money to conduct an enrollment study to analyze the closure of schools. 
 
""We can't layoff 75 people a year. It is simply not feasible. We have to find other ways. I would be committing malpractice if I did not suggest we look at closing a school or closing two schools," McCandless said. 
 
Closing a school isn't unfathomable and has been a growing consideration throughout the county. Most recently, the Adams-Cheshire Regional School District voted to close an elementary school. The parochial St. Joseph's High School will hold its final classes this year. And the Berkshire County Educational Task Force is developing action plans likely to include reduction of the number of high schools in the county. Those recommendations are expected to be presented by July. 
 
"These are natural conversations that you have to have when your student populations are decreasing and funding remains stagnant, but yet those costs of contractual obligations, health insurance, and retirement obligations are always there. We are all looking for ways to do more with less right now. And painful decisions have to be made. The Berkshire County Educational Task Force has been working on this for the past year and while major charges aren't ready to be rolled out, expect to see proposals later this year," Cutler said. 
 
McCandless added he is considering withdrawing from the accrediting New England Association of Schools and Colleges, saying that the recommendations are now becoming more of an add than a need because the district can't afford to implement the changes the organization recommends. He said the state guidelines and NESAC are often completely different and he is finding it difficult to justify paying $10,000 every year and some $30,000 every few years for a review visit. 
 
"To write this check every year and a really big check every year is tougher to do each and every year," McCandless said, adding that one paraprofessional staying on staff with that money could ultimately make a more meaningful impact on a student's life. 
 
McCandless also rejected the notion that the call for a reduction in staffing by such an amount was a "scare tactic" intended to get the council to ultimately give the district more money. He said 85 percent of the budget last year went toward staffing and in this proposal, 83 percent will go toward it. The 17 percent spent outside of staffing goes to utilities, internet, furniture, teaching and assessment materials, and the like.
 
McCandless said if all of that was cut and students were "learning by candle light" it still wouldn't be enough to hit the level-funding target.
 
The financial challenges won't be going away anytime soon. McCandless said he recently spoke to a former superintendent from Worcester who said it took that city six years to out from under the levy ceiling. 
 
"There is no single solution. We have to ride out this downturn by cost containment, we have to chase down every piece of new growth, every opportunity for new construction in every area of the economy," Tyer said. 
 
School Committee member Anthony Riello said every year as police chief he would be asked by administrations to come in at level funding. But, the difference is each year he had an opportunity to advocate for the funds. He said there just won't be the funds available to make a case for.
 
"I never once had a mayor or a town manager or a selectman come to me and say chief we are going to give you a 5 percent increase. It was always level funded or a cut," Riello said.
 
But, "We're faced with a situation today like none other that I've ever experienced. It is what you see is what you get."
 
He had the same tone as the other School Committee members in saying, "I don't support what we are doing but I know that we have to do it."
 
Elias said, "If we don't act responsibly now, the compounding negative effect next year would be irresponsible on our part."
 
"We don't want to have to eliminate anything. If it were up to us, would we be cutting even one position? No. We would be finding more ways to grow the great things we do with the Pittsfield Public Schools," Cutler said. "But money does not grow on trees and we we have a fiduciary duty to our taxpayers and to ourselves and to the future success of our city to be fiscally responsible and present a level-funded budget to the city council for review this spring."
 
Pamela Farron said, "We do not want to make these cuts. This is the situation we are in."
 
And Tyer, "We are in this dilemma of how do we responsibly reduce our budget in the way that we are forcefully reduce to... I can't possibly express how deeply upsetting this situation is to me because I do understand that it is people being affected...This is a serious challenge for all of us. This is a gut wrenching experience for everyone."
 
The budget will next go to a public hearing next week.

Budget Presentation April 5 2017.pdf by iBerkshires.com on Scribd

 

Pittsfield Schools FY18 Line Item Budget April 5 2017 by iBerkshires.com on Scribd

 


Tags: fiscal 2018,   Pittsfield School Committee,   pittsfield schools,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories