image description
The City Council spent a total of four hours reviewing the spending plans for the next fiscal year on Tuesday night.

Pittsfield Questions Streetlight Conversion Plan In Capital Budget

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council gave its preliminary authorization Tuesday night for the city to borrow $8.1 million for capital projects and another $14.3 million for capital projects with the water and sewer system.
 
A plan on the city side of the ledger to convert all of the street lights to LEDs, or light-emitting diodes, at a cost of $3 million raised many eyebrows.
 
Councilor at Large Melissa Mazzeo called the plan a "slap in the face" to all of the residents who have had to live with broken streetlights, in some cases for years. There are numerous lights throughout the city that aren't working but the Department of Public Services hasn't found the cause of the problem, whether it be underground wiring or some other type of shortage beyond a bulb
 
"I feel we should be taking all of this money and fixing the lights that aren't working," Mazzeo said.
 
Instead, the $3 million plan doesn't allocate any additional funds to fix those but instead provides everybody living on streets that are currently lit with even better lighting. And those with broken lights will remain in the dark.
 
Ward 5 Councilor Donna Todd Rivers understands that argument well. She said she fielded a dozen phones calls on Tuesday alone from residents and nine of them were talking about street lights. But, the lights that need more than a bulb replacement never seem to get fixed.
 
"At some point, we need to stop saying we will get to it, we need to stop saying it is difficult to solve and since it is difficult to solve then we aren't going to do it," Rivers said. "If we can afford to appropriate this $3 million,  then I'd rather take care of what we have."
 
Commissioner of Public Services David Turocy said, "this isn't an either or proposition." He said the department will continue to investigate and fix wiring problems. If anything, changing out all of the bulbs will help those efforts because he will have a "ground zero" look at which ones aren't working. If all 5,326 light bulbs are replaced, the ones that aren't working must have further electrical problems.
 
He says now is really the time to do that particularly because the city is in line to get a rebate for 30 percent of the material and installation cost with the move through a state grant. 
 
Rivers responded by saying, "It almost sounds like we a buying something because we have a coupon for it," which is a practice she doesn't embrace. 
 
Turocy said he'd be proposing to do the conversion whether or not there was a state grant. Mayor Linda Tyer backed Turocy up by saying it makes sense now more than ever because of the proposed Eversource rate increase.
 
Turocy has estimates showing the city would be saving $250,000 per year in electricity and $100,000 in reduced maintenance. That would pay back the investment in seven to nine years, depending on the amount of the state grant. 
 
Councilor at Large Peter White said the lights will last a minimum of 20 years, so the overall savings free up money to put toward fixing the wiring issues on poles that don't work.
 
"I think by doing this we can save enough money to take care of those issues too," White said. "To me, this seems like a win-win to save money and take care of our issues."
 
Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi opposed it, but mostly for a different reason. The city still hasn't put lighting on the north side of Tyler Street. In 2014 the City Council voted to allocate funds to do that but the expense never happened. Now, Turocy couldn't commit to using some of this new $3 million authorization to install lights there.
 
"We have not ruled out other options for adding streetlights to Tyler Street," Turocy said but said there are other options to fund the lighting project.
 
Ward 4 Councilor Christopher Connell said the city has been lacking in taking care of the basic things, such as ensuring the lights are on. He approved the project but said, "we've got to come up with a fast plan" to fix all of the lights that are out.
 
In another portion of the capital budget, Connell suggested using funds to install an air exchange system in the basement of City Hall. Three years ago, the city moved all of the inspectors working in the basement, as well as some other departments, into a leased space at 100 North St. Since then, the City Council put forth $100,000 to fix a water infiltration issue under the front stairs of City Hall. 
 
Director of Building Maintenance Brian Filliault said there is still some more work needed on the stairs but he believes with another $100,000 of investment into that and the air exchange, the issues with the basement can be resolved.
 
"Maybe it is time to stop paying $100,000 for a lease over at 100 North St.," Connell suggested.
 
Connell's suggestion didn't come with a motion to add anything into the budget, so it never went to a vote.
 
The budget also calls for $80,000 for resurfacing of basketball courts, which Parks and Open Spaces Manager James McGrath said is part of a rotating effort to improve the park system. The basketball courts are the most used areas of the city's park system, he said.
 
"We are trying to systematically address all of the issues across the city," McGrath said.
 
The capital budget also calls for $2.5 million in street repairs; $500,000 for stormwater improvements; new vehicles for various departments including a new street sweeper and new plow truck; the installation of bathrooms at Durant Park; environmental abatement in schools; the restoration of the Capitol Theatre marquee; the city's contribution to the Westside Riverway Park project; new turnout gear for the Fire Department; new voting machines; and some $425,000 in technology for the Police Department.
 
The sewer and wastewater project passed without a word. Those projects are paid for through the rates for those users.
 
The largest project is $8.4 million to replace primary pumps at the wastewater treatment plant. The project was identified in 2007 because the force main, constructed in 1963, is at risk of failure, according to the capital plan. The piping had suffered corrosion and there is a chance of leaking in the force main, which would deliberate the plant. 
 
The Department of Utilities will also be fixing a water main on West Housatonic Street, repairing the dam at Upper Sackett Reservoir, and rehabilitating siphons and infiltration at the Wastewater Treatment plant. 

 


Tags: capital budget,   pittsfield_budget,   street lights,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories