image description
Selectmen at their first meeting of the year opened a warrant for a special town meeting and voted compensation for two employees taking on additional responsibilities.

Adams Sets Special Town Meeting on Marijuana Bylaw

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

ADAMS, Mass. — The Selectmen have set a special town meeting for Monday, March 5, chiefly to vote on a new marijuana bylaw and other outstanding items.

"We have been discussing a special town meeting for some months now," Chairman John Duval said at Wednesday's brief meeting. "We need to clean up some items."

The board also voted to open a special town meeting warrant that will close Jan. 31. Duval said the board will go over other warrant items and possible citizens petitions at an upcoming meeting.

The Planning Board last month voted to recommend the retail marijuana bylaw. Retailers will only be able to locate in the downtown, or B-2 district, with a special permit from the planners, but can't be located closer than 250 feet from schools, day-care centers or other areas where minors commonly congregate and are the population primarily served by the facility. With three schools downtown, that limits where retailers can set up shop. 

Retailers, cultivators, and processors can operate in the Industrial Park by right but independent testing laboratories will require a special permit to locate in the park. The bylaw can be found here. A public hearing last month drew few residents and there has been no significant opposition to cannabis businesses operating in the town.

The Selectmen also voted to compensate Director of Community Development Donna Cesan for the added responsibilities she has taken on serving as the interim town administrator.

"Donna is still the director of community development and those responsibilities have not gone away," Duval said. "She has taken on extra responsibilities."

Cesan will be paid an extra $350 each week while in the position.

The Selectmen also voted to compensate Town Accountant Mary Beverly, who also will take on extra financial responsibilities during the town administrator search process. Duval said Beverly will have a more substantial role in this year's budget process.

Beverley will be compensated an extra $200 a week.

Duval said these are the same amounts the Selectmen have compensated employees in the past.

"We thank them both for taking on these responsibilities in the interim," he said. "We really appreciate it."


Tags: bylaws,   marijuana,   special town meeting,   zoning,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Planning Board Cited for Open Meeting Law Violation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
ADAMS, Mass. — The state Attorney General's Office has determined that the Planning Board violated Open Meeting Law by continuing to deliberate on a matter after adjournment.
 
According to the determination, the violation occurred after adjourning the Jan. 27, 2025, meeting when three board members stayed to discuss permitting concerns for Aisling Mountain Farm, a 22-acre equestrian facility on West Road owned by Kathryn Foley.
 
The board was ordered to amend its meeting minutes within the next 30 days, to include a summary of the discussion that occurred after the meeting was adjourned, to certify to to the AG's Office that it has done so, and to comply with the Open Meeting Law going forward.
 
The ruling stems from a complaint filed by Catherine Foster on Aug. 22, 2025, alleging that the board violated the Open Meeting Law during and after its Jan. 27 meeting.
 
Although filed nearly seven months after the January meeting, the Attorney General's Office said it met the 30-day filing deadline because Foster did not become aware of the situation until it was raised at a July 23 Select Board meeting.
 
"The Open Meeting Law requires that complaints be filed within 30 days of the alleged violation, or if the alleged violation could not reasonably have been known at the time it occurred, then within 30 days of the date it should reasonably have been discovered," Assistant Attorney General Matthew Lindberg said in the determination.
 
"The complainant could not reasonably have discovered that the Board deliberated after adjournment of the January 27 meeting until the issue was raised during public comment at the July 23 Select Board meeting. Because the complaint was filed within 30 days of the July 23 Select Board meeting, the complaint was filed timely as to this allegation"
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories