Letter: Response to Indigenous People's Day Lawsuit Article

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

My name is Alexander Blumin, a U.S. citizen, born in Soviet Union in 1959.

Indeed, I filed a lawsuit in Berkshire Superior Court (Civil Action 1876CV00187), however, my lawsuit was not over Indigenous Peoples Day, but over Columbus Day.

3.4 Massachusetts General Laws states on Columbus Day: MGL Part I, Title II, Chapter 6, Section 12V. Columbus Day.

"The Governor shall annually issue a proclamation setting apart the second Monday in October as Columbus Day and recommending that it be observed by the people, with appropriate exercises in the schools and otherwise, to the end that the memory of the courage, perseverance and spiritual fervor of Christopher Columbus, discoverer of America, may be perpetuated." (Including Pittsfield Public Schools — comment by Plaintiff.)

3.4 paragraph, from my lawsuit.

Indigenous Peoples Day belongs to different date in State of Massachusetts:

3.5 Massachusetts General Laws, Part I, Title II, Chapter6, Section 12VV states:

Section 12VV: Native American Day
Section 12VV. The governor shall annually issue a proclamation setting apart the third Friday of September as Native American Day and recommending that said day be observed in an appropriate manner by the people.

Indigenous Peoples Day is already honored in the U.S. and all over the Globe:

3.6 The United Nations General Assembly by resolution 49/214 of Dec. 23, 1994, decided that the International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples shall be observed on Aug. 9 every year. Moreover, on Aug. 3, 1990,  President of the United States George H. W. Bush declared the month of November as National American Indian Heritage Month, thereafter commonly referred to as Native American Heritage Month.

(3.5 and 3.6 are also paragraphs from my lawsuit.)

iBerkshire statement in article was incorrect: “He claims the School Committee engaged in deceptive practices when it allowed School Committee member William Cameron to speak during the meeting in opposition to Columbus Day.”

I did not oppose free speech of Mr. Cameron. I opposed deceptive practice that he and Committee can seize legislative power from Boston. Read below from lawsuit:

3.7 School Committee engaged in Deceptive Practice — violation of Mass General Laws — by pretending on July 11, 2018, School Committee Meeting that they can seize Legislative and Executive power from Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives and Mass Governor by simply arguing as was done by 20 min lecture of member, William Cameron ... (3.7 paragraph from the lawsuit)


Don't like Christopher Columbus? OK! Follow the state law how to remove//rename/establish new law, new holiday in Massachusetts. School Committee cannot create new holiday since that legislative power belongs to Mass Senate and House of Representatives. Changing school calendar is not equal to changing/creating new holiday for Pittsfield schools only, sorry.

You think you can violate state law because people are afraid to fight city or School Committee or media in court? USA is still free capitalist country. We are not socialist country yet. The U.S. Judicial System exists exactly for the purpose to solve legal conflicts. There is nothing wrong to use it!

Alex Blumin
Pittsfield, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Reviews Financial Condition Before FY27 Budget

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The average single-family home in Pittsfield has increased by more than 40 percent since 2022. 

This was reported during a joint meeting of the City Council and School Committee on March 19, when the city's financial condition was reviewed ahead of the fiscal year 2027 budget process.

Mayor Peter Marchetti said the administration is getting "granular" with line items to find cost savings in the budget.  At the time, they had spoken to a handful of departments, asking tough questions and identifying vacancies and retirements. 

Last fiscal year’s $226,246,942 spending plan was a nearly 4.8 percent increase from FY24. 

In the last five years, the average single-family home in Pittsfield has increased 42 percent, from $222,073 in 2022 to $315,335 in 2026. 

"Your tax bill is your property value times the tax rate," the mayor explained. 

"When the tax rate goes up, it's usually because property values have gone down. When the property values go up, the tax rate comes down." 

Tax bills have increased on average by $280 per year over the last five years; the average home costs $5,518 annually in 2026. In 2022, the residential tax rate was $18.56 per thousand dollars of valuation, and the tax rate is $17.50 in 2026. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories