image description
The PEDA board was delivered with a fairly predictable audit on Wednesday.

Auditor: PEDA's Unrestricted Funds Continue to Dwindle

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — An urgency to develop the William Stanley Business Park continues to grow as another year has gone by without a significant windfall of income for the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority.
 
PEDA has been spending approximately $300,000 in General Electric settlement money per year to supplement its operations. That account has dwindled down over the years without a significant boon in revenue to replenish it and if the current trends continue, PEDA will be out of available funds by 2024.
 
"You are down to the five, six-year range and you don't have a replacement for that cash," auditor David Irwin from Adelson & Company told the board on Wednesday morning.
 
PEDA potentially has $5 million in its disposal for the property but $3 million of that is restricted to landscaping and foundation work and can be used by PEDA or General Electric. 
 
Overall, PEDA still has some $15.5 million worth of assets and ended 2017 with a net position of $7.7 million. But that cash on hand continues to be a concern for the organization.
 
Last year the auditors said the organization had just six to seven years left. On Wednesday, the auditors said that is now down to five or six. Of the money PEDA has left, only $2 million of it can be put toward operations.
 
Over the years it had some parcels developed with a solar array and the Mountain One Financial Center but the lease money isn't enough to cover operations. So each year that original $15.3 million given to the city by General Electric dwindles a bit more.
 
That concern is hardly new for the PEDA board. Recognizing the erosion of cash available for operations last year, the organization was reorganized. The executive director was reduced to a part-time position job and an agreement was reached with the city and the Pittsfield Economic Revitalization Corp. to share the cost of a business development manager. That essentially split the executive director's job into two disparate parts -- the sales and marketing into one job and the administration of the park another -- to lower overhead cost. 
 
The restructuring wasn't solely done because of the revenue figures and officials didn't hide the fact that they wanted to find ways to cut the annual budget to save whatever they could for possible incentives for prospective companies. 
 
"Our dream is to ensure that this property is full and thriving. That is really the goal here. It is not really for the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority to sustain itself but to really focus on the park," Vice Chairwoman Christina Wynn said on Wednesday.
 
Despite stagnate revenue numbers, there is optimism. The Berkshire Innovation Center remains on track to be built, a project that is hoped to be a catalyst to further development, and there have been prospective companies looking at some of the sites -- with the parcel known as the 40s getting a more serious look from a potential client. The organization will see some revenue, albeit a small amount, in the short term by a new lease for the other half of its office building. 
 
Other than that continued concern for cash flow, PEDA received a fairly vanilla audit for 2017 with no other major concerns standing out. 
 
PEDA was formed in 1998, 20 years ago, as part of the consent decree agreed upon when GE left town. PEDA was created to head efforts to find new tenants for the parcels left behind. Over the years, the organization had many promising prospects but much of the park remains unfilled. 
 
Last year the largest parcel was nearly sold when developer Waterstone proposed a Walmart at the parcel known as the teens. After months and months of design work, Walmart ultimately pulled out of the Waterstone agreement. On Wednesday, Executive Director Corydon Thurston said he hasn't heard from Waterstone recently about another tenant. 
 
Waterstone did put down a $65,000 non-refundable deposit on the property. That money is currently in an escrow and is eyed to go toward the developer's $1 million purchase. Should the developer not purchase the property by the end of the year, that money will go to PEDA.

Tags: audit,   PEDA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories