image description
Pine Valley Mobile Park residents want their roads fixed and to stop paying a rent increase that's not going to the park's septic work.

Pine Valley Residents Seek Rent Decrease

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
CHESHIRE, Mass. — The tenants at Pine Valley Mobile Home Park are petitioning for their rent to be decreased at an upcoming rent control hearing looking to settle the problem of unpaved roads in the park.
 
"We want to submit a decrease in rent ... Morgan Management has no plans on redoing the road at all," Pine Valley resident Roseanna St. Pierre told the Board of Selectmen on Tuesday. "They plan to refund us our money ... our lawyers told us they want to sell the place and leave it to the new owners."
 
The Selectmen, sitting as the Rent Control Board, approved a $7.20 monthly rent increase in 2016, $5.12 of which was to go toward repairing and repaving roads that were torn up during the installation of a new septic system.
 
This never happened and Morgan Management plans to sell the park.
 
A letter from Morgan Management's attorneys Kraus & Hummel indicated that a tenant reimbursement was being calculated and that the roads would not be paved.
 
St. Pierre added that, in 2014, the tenants had filed a lawsuit against Morgan Management after it was found that a rent increase did not directly go toward overdue septic repairs.
 
The court ultimately found this rent increase, of more than $60, to be illegal and ruled that it be reimbursed.
 
St. Pierre said the tenants are being reimbursed, however, the rent increase is still on the books.
 
"We are getting a refund but, in the meantime, we are still paying it," she said. "It did not decrease by $64; we are still paying it." 
 
Selectwoman Carol Francesconi said the board members plan to discuss the roads with Morgan Management's attorneys at the Sept. 6 rent control hearing because they, too, fear Morgan Management is positioning themselves to just reimburse the tenants.
 
"We want to discuss with them this idea that they are going to refund the money and not do the road so that is not a done deal yet," she said. "We have something to say about that." 
 
As for the petition, Francesconi asked that the rent adjustment be added to the agenda, however, Selectman Robert Ciskowski said he wasn't sure if this was under the town's purview. 
 
"I am not sure we have jurisdiction," he said. "A court can overturn us and can tell us to go back and do it again. A court can't tell us what the rent can be."
 
Ciskowski asked that the town reach out to town counsel to inform him of the petition and to figure out what the Rent Control Board actually has the power to do.
 
"We will try to get to the bottom of it," Francesconi said.
 
In other business, the state was to provide the town with two trucks and drivers to help haul the invasive tape weed away from Cheshire Reservoir on Thursday. 
 
"The state will be there with the trucks and we will be there with the backhoe," Francesconi said. "We are very pleased with how everything came about."
 
The town was last plagued by the weed in 2016 and had to bring in SOLitude Lake Management to clean up the lake with a rake type mechanism called a harvester.

Tags: mobile home park,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Cheshire Stories