image description

North Adams Council Approves Stipends for Retirement Board

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The new zoning map was presented to the council for approval on Tuesday but was instead sent to committee for further review. 
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday closed a somewhat controversial debate by voting 8-1 to allow a stipend for the Retirement Board. 
 
And it sent an ordinance that would cause major changes in the city's zoning to the Community Development Committee for further review.
 
The stipend matter had been brought before the council in June by Councilor Marie T. Harpin, the council's liaison to the board. 
 
The councilors had at first been positive toward the idea but when they felt some of the questions as to how the stipends would affect the city budget weren't being fully answered, they balked and sent the matter to the Finance Committee, which met two weeks ago. The committee returned a recommendation on Tuesday night to approve it.
 
Finance Committee Chairman Wayne Wilkinson described the meeting as "a very interesting discussion." 
 
"I learned a lot. But unfortunately, even though I think I have a really good grasp on finances it lost me in about 15 minutes," he joked. "What the people do in there is important stuff and they know a lot more about it than I did." 
 
The board, through its Administrator Beth A. Matson, had asked that the council adopt Massachusetts General Law Chapter 32 that sets a stipend of no less than $3,000 and no more than $4,500 annually. Once the law was adopted, the Retirement Board would have control over voting the stipend.
 
Wilkinson said Matson had given a very informative presentation at the finance meeting and that Councilors Harpin, Rebbecca Cohen and Jason LaForest had asked very good questions.
 
He said the issue came down to several facts: that the board is well run and does good work in its oversight of the city's $70 million or so in retirement funds, that the council has to adopt the law, that the board determines the amount of the stipend.
 
The bottom line, Wilkinson said, was how it affected the city budget. The appropriation for the fiscal 2019 budget is already set but the stipend would eventually come out of the administrative expenses in the contributions.
 
Wilkinson said he was originally against the idea, "but then I saw a list of some of the other stipends that are given by the city."
 
Several other councilors also noted that they had been opposed or not sure and that the presentation and research had convinced them to vote yes. It hadn't been an easy decision, said LaForest, and that the councilors had really debated the stipend.
 
"I did indicate that if the board were to approve anything higher than the minimum allotted by law, I would be very disappointed in them," he said. 
 
The board voted to adopt the law with only President Keith Bona voting against because he was concerned about setting a precedent. The Retirement Board works hard but so do other elected and volunteer boards, such as the School Committee that oversees half the city's budget. 
 
"It was really vetted and I think each councilor took the time to look into this deeply," said Harpin, who had advocated for it from the start. "I just appreciate all the work that was done on this. ... it's a hard-working crew that's done a lot for the city. It's a big portfolio."
 
The councilors were all on board with referring an update of the city's zoning map and permitted uses to committee to give them a chance to review it more fully.  
 
"I know a lot of work has been done and a lot of good work has been done but it's not very clear," said Wilkinson, who made the referral motion. "Zoning has the biggest effect on property values ... I have absolutely no idea what the present changes are."
 
LaForest read into the record a letter from David Moresi of Moresi & Associates who wrote that the zoning changes would have a negative impact on the Norad Mill, which is filling up with a wide range of small businesses. 
 
The mill would be in a new zone that would prohibit uses such as storage, assembly and finishing of goods and publishing, among others for the mill. 
 
"These are key uses to the redevelopment of the Norad Mill and the success it has had in bringing businesses and jobs to North Adams ... take the time to ensure there are no other unintended consequences created within the city," LaForest read.
 
The city has been working with the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission to realign and update outdated zoning. A joint public hearing with the Planning Board had been held last month. Councilors were also concerned that the changes had not been fully communicated to property owners who might be affected. 
 
"There was no sense there would be letters or communications that would directly inform those folks that the actual zone category of where they reside or work or own could or would be changing," Councilor Benjamin Lamb said. "If my property zone was changing, I would want to be informed."
 
Mayor Thomas Bernard believed a list of properties could be generated and property owners informed in some way. 
 
"I'm totally not against changing zoning because North Adams zoning is archaic," Wilkinson said. "It goes back to the 1950s." 
 
In other business, the council: 
  • Confirmed the appointment of Kayla Hollins to the Planning Board to complete the term of Allyson Holmes, who is moving. The term will end February 2022.
  • Approved a sewer hookup for Lily Kuzia for a new house being built at the top of North Eagle Street in Clarksburg. 
  • Set a public hearing for Tuesday, Nov. 13, on H.A. George's request to install additional propane tanks at 651 Ashland St.
Also, Mayor Thomas Bernard reminded residents that the winter parking ban goes into effect Nov. 1. There is no parking overnight during the ban to allow for plowing. 

Tags: retirement board,   stipend,   zoning,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Cost, Access to NBCTC High Among Concerns North Berkshire Residents

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff

Adams Select Chair Christine Hoyt, NBCTC Executive Director David Fabiano and William Solomon, the attorney representing the four communities, talk after the session. 
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Public access channels should be supported and made more available to the public — and not be subject to a charge.
 
More than three dozen community members in-person and online attended the public hearing  Wednesday on public access and service from Spectrum/Charter Communications. The session at City Hall was held for residents in Adams, Cheshire, Clarksburg and North Adams to express their concerns to Spectrum ahead of another 10-year contract that starts in October.
 
Listening via Zoom but not speaking was Jennifer Young, director state government affairs at Charter.
 
One speaker after another conveyed how critical local access television is to the community and emphasized the need for affordable and reliable services, particularly for vulnerable populations like the elderly. 
 
"I don't know if everybody else feels the same way but they have a monopoly," said Clarksburg resident David Emery. "They control everything we do because there's nobody else to go to. You're stuck with with them."
 
Public access television, like the 30-year-old Northern Berkshire Community Television, is funded by cable television companies through franchise fees, member fees, grants and contributions.
 
Spectrum is the only cable provider in the region and while residents can shift to satellite providers or streaming, Northern Berkshire Community Television is not available on those alternatives and they may not be easy for some to navigate. For instance, the Spectrum app is available on smart televisions but it doesn't include PEG, the public, educational and governmental channels provided by NBCTC. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories