image description

North Adams Council to Talk Sewer, Fiscal 2022 Budget

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Residents on Woodlawn Avenue are asking the city to defray some of the costs in connecting several homes along the street to the city's sewer system. 
 
Four families on the avenue say they have "pursued city sewer-hookup to no avail" and that the line stops at 78 Woodlawn and does not include the homes at 94, 100, 108 and 116 Woodlawn. The septic at 108 Woodlawn has failed, they wrote in a letter to the City Council, and the property will not perk. 
 
They have an estimate of about $42,000 to have the four properties connected, which does not include tanks or unforeseen circumstances. They say the Department of Public Works has offered to donate piping and fittings but the city has rejected taking this on as a project. 
 
"We are asking the City for monies to help cover the cost of the contractor's fees in addition to the donated piping and fittings," the group asks.
 
President Jason LaForest is asking the administration to take on this project through expected monies from the federal American Rescue Plan Act. The city is anticipating $3.7 million but there are conditions on how it can be spent. 
 
"The inclusion of these homes on city sewer would have ecological benefits, improve the quality of life of our constituents on Woodlawn Avenue, and offer an appreciable return on investment for the city," LaForest wrote to the council. 
 
The issue has been placed on the agenda for Tuesday's meeting.
 
The City Council also will be voting on the proposed $42 million spending plan for fiscal 2022 on Tuesday. 
 
The budget was given a final review last week by the Finance Committee, which voted to recommend it as presented, including the addition of a deputy fire chief, the reclassification of several positions, and a $17,769,074 school budget approved by the School Committee last week. 
 
What won't be recommended is bumping up the mayor's salary as first broached by Councilor Marie T. Harpin at a City Council meeting on June 8. Harpin had pointed out that — with this budget — there would be seven positions making more than the mayor. 
 
She again raised the subject at last week's Finance Committee meeting but the committee and the mayor said it would be too late in the process because it would put the budget out of balance. 
 
"My plan was to vote the budget, vote the classification plan, and then do this in the summer/fall, effective July 1 of next year," said committee Chairwoman Lisa Blackmer. "Make it effective fiscal 2023 because we can't add to the budget."
 
Mayor Thomas Bernard, who is not running for re-election, also recommended that the conversation be done ahead so the wage increase would fall in the next fiscal year.
 
"There was ample opportunity for the council, the committee, or individual members to make this request prior to budget submission," he wrote to the Finance Committee and City Council. "This was the process that was followed in 2019, the last time the mayor's salary was adjusted."
 
Harpin had, in fact, been the one to bring the wage increase into the budget discussions for fiscal 2020 as chair of the Finance Committee in 2019. The classification and compensation plan had been amended at that time to raise the salary of the mayor by $4,000 to $88,470 effective Jan. 1, 2020 (after the 2019 election). It was the first time the salary had been increased in nearly a dozen years. 
 
The council will also be asked to accept the transfer of $300,000 for a feasibility study for Brayton School. The School Committee voted to take these funds from the school choice account, which has more than $2 million in it.  
 
The council is expected to pass zoning ordinance changes presented at public hearing last week that include giving the Planning Board and building inspector authority to revoke a special permit or levy fines if the applicant fails to abide by the permit. 
 
 

Tags: fiscal 2022,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Cost, Access to NBCTC High Among Concerns North Berkshire Residents

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff

Adams Select Chair Christine Hoyt, NBCTC Executive Director David Fabiano and William Solomon, the attorney representing the four communities, talk after the session. 
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Public access channels should be supported and made more available to the public — and not be subject to a charge.
 
More than three dozen community members in-person and online attended the public hearing  Wednesday on public access and service from Spectrum/Charter Communications. The session at City Hall was held for residents in Adams, Cheshire, Clarksburg and North Adams to express their concerns to Spectrum ahead of another 10-year contract that starts in October.
 
Listening via Zoom but not speaking was Jennifer Young, director state government affairs at Charter.
 
One speaker after another conveyed how critical local access television is to the community and emphasized the need for affordable and reliable services, particularly for vulnerable populations like the elderly. 
 
"I don't know if everybody else feels the same way but they have a monopoly," said Clarksburg resident David Emery. "They control everything we do because there's nobody else to go to. You're stuck with with them."
 
Public access television, like the 30-year-old Northern Berkshire Community Television, is funded by cable television companies through franchise fees, member fees, grants and contributions.
 
Spectrum is the only cable provider in the region and while residents can shift to satellite providers or streaming, Northern Berkshire Community Television is not available on those alternatives and they may not be easy for some to navigate. For instance, the Spectrum app is available on smart televisions but it doesn't include PEG, the public, educational and governmental channels provided by NBCTC. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories