NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Residents on Woodlawn Avenue are asking the city to defray some of the costs in connecting several homes along the street to the city's sewer system.
Four families on the avenue say they have "pursued city sewer-hookup to no avail" and that the line stops at 78 Woodlawn and does not include the homes at 94, 100, 108 and 116 Woodlawn. The septic at 108 Woodlawn has failed, they wrote in a letter to the City Council, and the property will not perk.
They have an estimate of about $42,000 to have the four properties connected, which does not include tanks or unforeseen circumstances. They say the Department of Public Works has offered to donate piping and fittings but the city has rejected taking this on as a project.
"We are asking the City for monies to help cover the cost of the contractor's fees in addition to the donated piping and fittings," the group asks.
President Jason LaForest is asking the administration to take on this project through expected monies from the federal American Rescue Plan Act. The city is anticipating $3.7 million but there are conditions on how it can be spent.
"The inclusion of these homes on city sewer would have ecological benefits, improve the quality of life of our constituents on Woodlawn Avenue, and offer an appreciable return on investment for the city," LaForest wrote to the council.
The issue has been placed on the agenda for Tuesday's meeting.
The City Council also will be voting on the proposed $42 million spending plan for fiscal 2022 on Tuesday.
The budget was given a final review last week by the Finance Committee, which voted to recommend it as presented, including the addition of a deputy fire chief, the reclassification of several positions, and a $17,769,074 school budget approved by the School Committee last week.
What won't be recommended is bumping up the mayor's salary as first broached by Councilor Marie T. Harpin at a City Council meeting on June 8. Harpin had pointed out that — with this budget — there would be seven positions making more than the mayor.
She again raised the subject at last week's Finance Committee meeting but the committee and the mayor said it would be too late in the process because it would put the budget out of balance.
"My plan was to vote the budget, vote the classification plan, and then do this in the summer/fall, effective July 1 of next year," said committee Chairwoman Lisa Blackmer. "Make it effective fiscal 2023 because we can't add to the budget."
Mayor Thomas Bernard, who is not running for re-election, also recommended that the conversation be done ahead so the wage increase would fall in the next fiscal year.
"There was ample opportunity for the council, the committee, or individual members to make this request prior to budget submission," he wrote to the Finance Committee and City Council. "This was the process that was followed in 2019, the last time the mayor's salary was adjusted."
Harpin had, in fact, been the one to bring the wage increase into the budget discussions for fiscal 2020 as chair of the Finance Committee in 2019. The classification and compensation plan had been amended at that time to raise the salary of the mayor by $4,000 to $88,470 effective Jan. 1, 2020 (after the 2019 election). It was the first time the salary had been increased in nearly a dozen years.
The council will also be asked to accept the transfer of $300,000 for a feasibility study for Brayton School. The School Committee voted to take these funds from the school choice account, which has more than $2 million in it.
The council is expected to pass zoning ordinance changes presented at public hearing last week that include giving the Planning Board and building inspector authority to revoke a special permit or levy fines if the applicant fails to abide by the permit.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Letter: I support Andrew Fitch for State Representative
Letter to the Editor
To the Editor:
I am proud to support Andrew Fitch as a candidate for state representative, and to encourage voters in our district to entrust him with your vote in the state primary election on Sept. 1.
When I cast my vote it will be a vote for Andrew Fitch and not a vote against the incumbent. Here's why: Andrew brings experience as an entrepreneur, business owner, public official, community organizer, and advocate to his candidacy. In speaking with and listening to him I know that he will bring a curious, thoughtful, and collaborative approach to Beacon Hill; partner effectively with his colleagues in the Berkshire legislative delegation, across Western Massachusetts, and beyond; take a holistic view of the district as more than just a collection of individual communities; and serve with humility, an open heart, and deep consideration for the people of the district.
Experience and longevity are an asset when they lead to effective representation. When they become an end in an of themselves, they become a liability and evidence that it is time for new representation. That time is now. Andrew Fitch is the state representative we need.
Andrew Fitch, currently a city councilor in the district's largest municipality — and the commonwealth's smallest city — is challenging former North Adams Mayor John Barrett III, who won the First Berkshire seat in a 2017 special election, in the Democratic Party primary. click for more
In preparation for the 25th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, the Fire Department wanted to clean up the side yard where it typically holds a remembrance ceremony. click for more
Gov. Maura Healey took some time out of her campaign swing through the Berkshires on Monday to tour the under construction $65 million Greylock School project. click for more