Letter: Williamstown Planning Board Proposals

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Has the elected Williamstown Planning Board amassed ANY data before making its radical town meeting proposals?

The architect behind the 1/3 reduction in lot frontage appears to be Chris Winters who is running for re-election to a five-year term. Much damage can be done in five years. What is the source for this reduced frontage plan? A yes vote will create "Williamstown Lite."

If these scary Planning Board proposals pass, they will be with us forever, before the town's new Master Plan is completed and paid for.

Since the Planning Board has no clue whether these proposals will create any affordable housing, the town meeting vote should not use the governor's new majority vote rule for passage and all articles should require a two-thirds vote. It will, however, take a two-thirds vote to repeal them.

Town meeting has long been broken and the Planning Board proposals should be on the ballot at the annual town election. Few citizens attend town meeting compared to annual election voters.


How will these proposals affect property values, assessments, and taxes? It could be weeks, months, or years before anyone knows.

Let's look at an ideal 20-home street in the GR zone. Currently, each has exactly 100 feet of frontage. The two registered voters in the household feel confident that Williamstown Lite will not apply to their street and they vote yes at the town meeting. No new lots will be created. However, more than frontage dimensions were reduced. A neighbor builds an enclosed porch in front of their house which extends to 20 feet from the street. Now, it becomes more difficult to see oncoming traffic when pulling of the driveway. Roads have speeders, blind hills, and curves. Another neighbor builds a two-story garage 10 feet away which enables them to see into our bedroom windows, and it blocks the morning sun that used to wash our windows. Dang! Then, two adjacent houses get sold and a developer razes them and builds three houses all of which are within the new, reduced 10-foot side lot requirements. We turn off our Wi-Fi when not in use; neighbor runs theirs 24/7. Maybe we should have voted against Williamstown Lite. We thought we were immune from any reduction in our quality of life.

Do people who work in Williamstown really want to live in Williamstown? Why? To pay higher taxes and get less housing value?

On Route 2 at 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. watch many Williamstown residents drive daily to North Adams, and many North Adams residents drive to Williamstown to work. Then conduct the following survey of Williams College, Williamstown town employees, and Mount Greylock school district employees: compile a listing of residential ZIP codes of all the employees of each of these three entities. An awakening?

Key U.S. census figures for Williamstown for 2020 and 2010 respectively? Median household income (2015-19) is $83,911. (Mean is higher). Population is 7,513 and was 7,754. Time travelled to work = 15.2 minutes.

Ken Swiatek
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Incomplete Picture from Greylock School Committee

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

At the October Mount Greylock School Committee meeting, there was much celebration over the student growth percentiles (SGP) from last year's MCAS test data (Spring 2026). Growth is worth celebrating. But I worry the meeting, and the coverage of it, left families and our community with an incomplete picture of how our students are doing in math.

"Growth" sounds like it means scores went up, but that isn’t quite what SGP measures. SGP compares each student to students in the state who scored about the same the year before, then ranks how they did this year against that group. If a whole group of similar students decreases, the student who decreases the least can still earn a high growth percentile. A strong SGP tells us our students did better than their peers who scored similarly the year before. It doesn't tell us whether they are at grade level.

For example, the current 6th grade class at Williamstown Elementary School (WES) has decreased in their grade-level math proficiency every year since their 3rd grade MCAS. In 2024, 64 percent of the class was meeting expectations; in 2025 48 percent were at grade level, and in 2026 only 33 percent of their class met grade-level expectations. Our current WES 5th grade class follows a similar trend, with 48 percent meeting grade-level math expectations last year vs 56 percent meeting expectations in 2025 when they were in 3rd grade.

Not every class follows this pattern; our current 7th graders gained to 62 percent last year. But seeing entire classes decrease is something that deserves our attention.

Growth comparisons across the state provide useful information, but they do not tell the complete story. We also need to look at where our students are in terms of grade-level proficiency and how those numbers are changing from year to year within the Mt. Greylock school district. This will be our first year with the math interventionist role filled at WES and our second year with the new i-Ready curriculum.

As we watch whether these changes are working, I hope the School Committee will discuss proficiency alongside growth in its public meetings, so our community can see the full picture. Growth matters, but it isn’t enough if fewer of our kids are reaching grade level each year.

Sincerely,

Jenna Hasenkampf
Williamstown, Mass.

Hasenkampf is a parent of WES students in Grades 2 and 4.

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories