Letter: Harrington Deserves Another Term

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I'm writing to express my wholehearted endorsement of Andrea Harrington — we have been friends for many years, through thick and thin. I look at the criminal justice system through the lens of our community's most marginalized neighbors. Andrea walks the walk on showing up to make change.

She understands the value of harm reduction better than any other politician I’ve worked with. She has been a champion for keeping drug use in the realm of public health where it belongs. She has focused the arm of justice on where it belongs — domestic violence and murder.

She has faced extremely biased reporting by our local paper of record. It has been very disappointing to see the repeated smears. It has made people afraid to support her publicly, even though in private they think she is doing a good job.

It is also worth noting that the courts were fully closed during a significant portion of her tenure. Now that they are open, violent crimes are being successfully prosecuted.

Andrea has earned your vote for another four years.

Stephen Murray
North Adams, Mass.

 

 


Tags: election 2022,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

North Adams Regulating AI Use in Public Systems

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The City Council is considering ways to control the use of so-called artificial intelligence for public services. 
 
The draft ordinance is proposed by Council President Ashley Shade, who said she has been working for more than a year on language for a new chapter in the city's code — "Safeguards for Artificial Intelligence, Fairness & Equity."
 
"The language that I proposed was from a mixture of different ordinances that other communities have adopted, but there are no ordinances like this in the commonwealth, or even in this country, that I could find," she said at Tuesday's General Government Committee meeting. "I built this so it could be built upon. The whole point of the language in here is so that it's a starting point, and that it gets continually built up. ... 
 
"The number one thing that this ordinance does, and the most important thing to me about this ordinance, is that we are protecting the civil rights of the people in our community."
 
Shade, a member of the committee, told the dozen attendees at the meeting that AI was happening; but the city could regulate it and require it be used in a responsible way. 
 
The AI Safety ordinance basically defines two types of AI: high risk and low risk. Low-risk are applications and software that hold no decision-making capabilities such as for transcription, spell checking, etc. So internal administrative, clerical, or productivity tools that "do not materially affect rights, benefits, or enforcement outcomes shall not be considered high-risk."
 
High-risk is any application being used for public services that could 1) affect someone's legal rights, benefits or access to services; 2) employment decisions such as hiring, evaluation, discipline or termination; 3) code and law enforcement; 4) surveillance, monitoring and tracking; and 5) that present a risk of discrimination or "disparate impact under applicable law."
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories