State Fire Marshall: Space Heaters Need Space

Print Story | Email Story

BRIMFIELD—Brimfield Fire Chief Don Contois, State Fire Marshal Peter Ostroskey, and Hampden County District Attorney Anthony Gulluni said a fatal fire last week in Brimfield started accidentally with a space heater, prompting a reminder to use these appliances safely.

"Space heaters need space," said Chief Contois. "If you’re using one at home, keep anything that can burn at least three feet away on all sides and be sure to turn them off when you leave the room or go to sleep."

The Dec. 22 fire on 3rd Street claimed the life of an older adult. Its origin and cause were jointly investigated by the Brimfield Fire Department, the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal’s office, and State Police assigned to the Hampden DA’s office. They were assisted by the Department of Fire Services’ Code Compliance & Enforcement Unit.

Investigators found numerous space heaters in the single-family lakeside home. The investigation determined that the fire began in the living room with a portable propane-fueled space heater.

"Portable space heaters caused more than a dozen fires in Massachusetts last winter, including one in Holliston that claimed a resident’s life," said State Fire Marshal Ostroskey. "Remember that kerosene space heaters and portable propane space heaters are not permitted for residential use in Massachusetts. Electric space heaters should be plugged directly into a wall outlet, and they should have an automatic shut-off switch that disables the device if it tips over."

Investigators found no working smoke or carbon monoxide alarms at the scene. Both Chief Contois and State Fire Marshal Ostroskey emphasized the importance of smoke and carbon monoxide alarms in every residence.

"Heating equipment is the second-leading cause of residential fires and the main source of carbon monoxide at home," they said. "Smoke and CO alarms are your family’s first line of defense, so be sure you have them on every level of your home and test them once a month to be sure they’re working properly."

Modern smoke and CO alarms have a manufacturing date printed on the back. Smoke alarms should be replaced after 10 years, and carbon monoxide alarms should be replaced after five to seven years depending on the model. Alarms without a manufacturing date should be replaced right away. If your alarms take alkaline batteries and are still in their useful lifespan, change the batteries twice a year. If purchasing a new alarm, choose one with a sealed, long-life battery and a hush feature.

Finally, residents struggling to pay for heating bills or maintenance may be eligible for assistance through the Massachusetts home energy assistance program (LIHEAP). No matter what type of heating source you have, LIHEAP may be able to help you pay your winter heating bills or maintain your heating system so it runs more safely and efficiently. All Massachusetts residents are encouraged to explore eligibility for this free program and apply for assistance.

For more information on winter heating safety, visit www.mass.gov/keepwarmkeepsafe.

 

Tags: state fire marshal,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Berkshire Mall Sale Falls Through; Talks Still on the Table

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Potential Berkshire Mall buyer Cypress Equities has pulled out of the deal to turn the former mall into a shopping center.

Current mall owner JMJ RE Holdings had a purchase-and-sale agreement with the Dallas shopping center developer since May. 

In August, Cypress's managing director, Scott Harrington, presented the company's hopes on developing the defunct property. The company aimed to attract top national brands while incorporating green spaces, murals by local artists, and more. At the time, Harrington said two large tenants had already expressed interest.

Last week, Cypress Equities pulled out of the current contract, but did not say it was completely done with the mall. 

Harrington said in an email Wednesday that the company's due diligence discovered four primary challenges in developing the project.

• There is not enough service/pressure to the property to support redevelopment project without constructing costly water tanks.

• The current septic system and former treatment facility is not acceptable for a project of the scale and magnitude proposed.

• There is existing asbestos and bad soil from the treatment system that needs to be remediated off site.

• And, "Baker Hill Road District, as it is currently constructed, the District assessments and governance will not work for our project."

"All these challenges must be resolved before we proceed with the project. We hope to continue our conversations with the various stakeholders to find solutions," he said.

The road district, established back in the 1980s when the mall was built to oversee the Connector Road and assess for certain town services, has been a sticking point for JMJ and prior mall owners. They've pushed for its dissolution along with reducing assessments on the vacant property.

Earlier this week, Tim Grogan, development consultant for JMJ RE Holdings said in a statement through email that Cypress had terminated the contract because of the costs of the Baker Hill Road District, now renamed the Baker Hill Business District.

"Cypress has terminated the existing contract citing the extraordinary costs of the Baker Hill Road District under its current structure. While they did back out of the current contract, they have expressed interest in still purchasing the property if the issues with the Baker Hill Road District are resolved," he wrote. "These issues include moderating its operating budget, addressing the disproportionate past due assessments, altering its organizational structure, and being able to leverage the District to cover various infrastructure costs. All these issues would need to be addressed before they would be willing to move forward."

Last month, Jay Jones of JMJ said a key obstacle to the sale remained unresolved: the lawsuit between JMJ and the district over property taxes. He said the purchase-and-sale agreement with Cypress had a deadline, and argued that the transaction could not close without an agreement.

"You have to have a settlement in order to have Cypress receive the property with a clean title, and I don't know what in the world everyone is discussing moving forward for when that's the biggest issue and the biggest hurdle," Jones said in the October meeting. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories