Pittsfield Cable Panel Maps Out Work Before Spectrum Talks

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — At its second meeting, the reconstituted Cable Advisory Committee looked ahead to its hiring of outside counsel and ascertainment process for negotiating a new contract with Spectrum. 

An attorney is being considered to guide the process with a price tag ranging from $7,000 to $14,000 and a subcommittee was created to make an ascertainment schedule for the next nine months. 
 
"It's an important process for the stakeholders in the community to have their say and to have varied and diverse communities to be able to hear from them," said member Shawn Serre, who is the executivedirector of Pittsfield Community Television.
 
"And those are the kinds of things we will have to design as a committee to make sure that we can reach out and bring those voices in to make commentary." 
 
A funding request was tabled until they have more information on the resources needed for outside counsel. 
 
The city's 10-year contract ends in September 2024 and it is recommended that the contract negotiations take place over 12 months.  
 
Before September of this year, the committee will gather feedback from the community on what is and is not working with Spectrum and any additional needs.
 
This includes reviewing documents and forms, surveying, having a focus group, and public hearings. 
 
"I think the very first thing is we have to have a schedule," said member James Moran, who will help draft a schedule for the ascertainment process. 
 
Serre reported that he researched three attorneys in the state that specialize in cable television franchise renewals. Two of the three responded and after one dropped out due to a possible conflict of interest, one remained. 
 
William Solomon, who is based in the eastern end of the state, has a good amount of experience working with Comcast and has done several charter renewals.
 
"He has a pretty good feeling for how Comcast operates and the types of resources that they have at their disposal and the types of tactics that they will use in situations like this, Serre said. 
 
"So I was very comfortable hearing that from him and knowing the experience that he has, I feel like he would be an excellent fit for representing us at the table." 
 
The attorney expressed interest in working with the city and said he would be available to meet with the commission at its next meeting. 
 
The cost estimate of $7,000 to $14,000 would depend on the number of times Solomon would have to come to the area. 
 
Committee members agreed that it is a reasonable ask for an attorney. 
 
"I think that’s reasonable, personally," Serre said, adding that there would be other costs if it turned into a court case or needed an official review. 
 
There was some concern about only having one candidate for the job and he agreed to reach out to the attorney whom he hadn’t heard back from again.
 
The committee will also look to other communities such as Falmouth and Worcester to inform its process. 
 
For the next meeting on Feb. 9, the panel hopes to have a schedule for community input actions to take before September as well as a scope of work and funding request to send to the mayor. 

Tags: cable television,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Schools Won't Release PHS Report

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — With the threat of legal action from staff members, the School Committee has voted not to release the redacted PHS investigative reports and instead re-release the executive summary. 

On Wednesday, elected school officials rescinded a January vote to release the reports with required redactions by Feb. 18, a deadline that was never met, and voted to re-release the executive summary.   

When it came time to vote on releasing the redacted May 2025 Pittsfield High School investigative report, only Ciara Batory and Carolyn Barry were in favor. 

"This is a year of PR that we've been getting on the Pittsfield High report. This has been going on for over a year, nonstop, every other month, something about the PHS report. It has not gone away for a reason, and the reason it did not go away is because people want to know what happened," Batory said. 

"These are people's children. I was reluctant to send my kids to school after reading this. Had I not trusted the schools that my kids go to and have relationships with the front office, I would have pulled all three of my children out of these schools after reading the comments that I read online, and again, as a parent, the only reason I wanted to read this is again because I didn't want to find out information from Facebook." 

Three administrators and two teachers, past and present, were investigated by Bulkley Richardson and Gelinas LLP for a range of allegations that surfaced or re-surfaced at the end of 2024 after Pittsfield High's former dean of students was arrested and charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for allegedly conspiring to traffic large quantities of cocaine in Western Massachusetts.

Some committee members said the January vote to "release the report in a redacted form by Feb. 18 and have it reviewed by the School Committee before its release to ensure there is enough to present" was confusing.

Batory and Barry thought the motion would release the report, which found allegations of misconduct "unsubstantiated." Batory said unsubstantiated does not mean wrongdoing, and it doesn't mean right doing.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories