Williamstown Fire Station Cut Down in Size

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The proposed fire station is getting slimmer by 5,000 square feet. 
 
The Building Committee on Wednesday was informed that progress had been made in reducing the size of the 27,218 structure to also reduce the cost.
 
"We met with firefighters last week in identifying some square footage that could be removed from the building in order to get us down to our revised budget of $22.5 [million]," said Bruce Decoteau, a former Williams College project manager consulting for the committee. "That was a very productive meeting. So we identified enough square footage to get the building down to approximately 22,000 square feet from 27." 
 
The district's designer Bob Mitchell was expected to have new floor plans sketched out by Friday, he said. "I really don't want to get into a lot of details until we can actually confirm that we have suggested would work."
 
The committee is preparing for a Fire District vote on Tuesday, Feb. 28, at 7 p.m. at the elementary school to authorize the appropriation of $22,500,000 to construct a new station at 562-580 Main St. 
 
The four different borrowing scenarios project an estimated $300 to $351 on the tax bill of a median single-family home assessed at $358,600.
 
Officials of the independent governmental body have been trying to reduce the cost to replace the current 72-year outdated building on Water Street. 
 
The estimate earlier this year of $25 million has been reduced to $22.5 million; Williams College has pledged $5 million toward the project and the Select Board this week authorized $225,000 from American Rescue Plan Act funds.
 
"It's a tough decision for them because they have so many demands on them," said committee member James Kolesar of the board. "But it was clear they wanted to endorse the project with some amount of money and that's where it ended up."
 
Committee member David Moresi, who had represented the district at Monday's Select Board meeting, thought it "sends a big message. It shows a lot of support."
 
Members thought there was still potential for public and private grants. 
 
"We have a project that's considered shovel ready. We can go after both state and federal grants," said Chair K. Elaine Neely.
 
Based on the rough figures of $706 per square feet calculated the designer, the reduction of 5,000 square feet would mean about $3.5 million in savings from the $25 million estimate.
 
Ryan Housman, a firefighter and member of the committee, said he had heard $750 and wondered where that number had come from. Decoteau said it was from recent bids on similar projects from EDM Architects and estimator Miyakoda Consulting.
 
Using that figure, savings could be about $3,750,000.
 
"I think 5,000 square feet is a huge cut," Housman, adding he understood the need. "I'm not a big fan of it personally."
 
Decoteau said the committee will also have to make decisions soon about Linear Park Drive and a choice of contractor. He suggested getting a smaller group together to work on the access to the site on Linear Park Drive regarding curb cuts and whether a traffic engineer would be needed. 
 
SLR Consulting and Gifford Construction had both been consulted on site preparation and both recommended surcharging, or structural fill for, the site. The only difference is SLR was advising an extra 3 feet while Gifford was looking at monitoring. 
 
The committee said it would expect to have proposals in hand before voting its March meeting. 
 

Tags: fire station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Moving Superintendent Evaluation to Fall

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass.—The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee this month discussed moving its evaluation of the superintendent from the spring to the fall starting in 2027.
 
Chair Julia Bowen brought the idea to the table as part of her proposed calendar for the committee's work during the 2026-27 academic year, saying that a move to the autumn will allow the committee to factor data from the preceding year into its evaluation.
 
"To the extent that [Superintendent Joseph Bergeron's] goals are tied to school performance and, specifically, MCAS [scores], we don't get that or other end of school year summative information until the fall," Bowen said. "Many schools I've worked with and know of actually moved their school leader evaluation to the fall so they can take advantage of all the data that's actually available, rather than doing it in the June time frame.
 
"The other point on that is, as it is, we otherwise vote for Joe's goals in September/October and evaluate him in May, and that's not a year. If we can do it fall to fall, we actually get a full year of work from when we agree on the goals."
 
The committee's most experienced member, Carolyn Greene, raised a concern about breaking with the practice of completing the evaluation process in May and June.
 
"It feels natural to evaluate a superintendent at the close of a school year, not the beginning of a school year," Greene said. "We're still in it in May and June. We're still in it in terms of our mindsets. Sometimes we don't meet in July. We come back in August and do a ‘retreat.' We're now meant to hit the ground running with an evaluation in September based on the work of the previous school year. And the reason is we don't get all the data from the previous school year until September.
 
"The rhythm is off for me. But it could just be that I'm so used to the previous rhythm. I don't want to oppose it. I just do have some reservations about it."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories