Letter: Night of the Living Voting Clickers

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I did a little research regarding the proposed Williamstown electronic voting devices and am offering more information than was provided by Selectman Daley.

First: The cost of the devices is $26,000 for 1,000. Williamstown, actually has more poverty than Lanesboro, and I’m sure 26 needy families could make good use of $1,000.

The devices appear to be of Asian origin and are identified as SunVote M30 Response Keypads. Other towns in New England have begun using these or similar devices. Williamstown appears to be gung-ho to jump on the bandwagon.

They are designed to work via Bluetooth radio waves. The keypads use two lithium CR2032 batteries each. They employ two-way RF 2.4GHz digital communication technology.

Some questions are:

Are they safe to use for everybody?
Could they affect anyone's medical devices?
Could having 1,000 keypads simultaneously pressed have cumulative, unpredictable consequences?

Up to 30 percent of the population may be sensitive to RF radio waves. Common symptoms may be anxiety, hyperactivity, irritability, depression, chest tightness, fatigue, memory loss, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, noise sensitivity, ringing in the ears, burning eyes, nervous bladder, heart palpitations, muscle tension, joint pain and skin rashes.

Can these keypads be hacked? Can voters/entities obtain additional keypads and vote more than once without being easily detected?

Conversely, how do you prevent the people sitting near you from seeing your vote?

There may be advantages to using these keypads. People may be more willing to oppose out-of-control spending if they can do it anonymously. However, it may be premature to adopt using these keypads without more longitudinal study.

Ken Swiatek
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Fin Comm Mulls Use of $2M Windfall

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Finance Committee last week discussed how the town should use the $2 million it is in line to receive from the sale of the former town garage site.
 
"My understanding from [Town Manager Robert Menicocci] is, unlike the [American Rescue Plan Act] funds, which were distributed by the Select Board, this is just another revenue for the town and has to go through town meeting," Chair Frederick Puddester told his colleagues. "It would be good for us to think about what our priorities might be for this, to give feedback to [Finance Director David Fierro] and [Menicocci] on how to deal with the $2 million that fell out of the sky."
 
Fierro confirmed to the committee that proceeds from the sale of 59 Water St. to Williams College would be classified as "special revenue" and sit outside the town's budget, needing an appropriation of town meeting to spend all or part of the windfall.
 
Melissa Cragg suggested that the special revenue could be left in free cash, but it would generate less of a return on the investment than it would if it went to, for example, the town's stabilization fund. One potential drawback of putting it in stabilization, Puddester noted, is that a two-thirds vote of town meeting then would be required for a withdrawal.
 
Suzanne Stinson, who was later elected to chair the committee for the 2026-27 meeting cycle, indicated that the $2 million could be used to address the issue of tax base growth that has concerned the Fin Comm for years.
 
"I feel like it would be important to put that into something that has a long-term outcome for the town, given how much we're talking about significant structural changes," Stinson said. "We talked about if we had a way of gaining development — either commercial real estate or residential development. Those things, in particular, could conceivably add to the tax revenue.
 
"If there's an opportunity, I'd like to make sure we think through those opportunities."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories