Letter: Fireworks Costly, Dangerous & Toxic

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I wrote the paragraph below on the Williamstown Facebook page regarding this year's fireworks plans. My comments are just as applicable to every town in the county and every city across America that plans a fireworks display.

The experience of Canadian forest fires' smoke-filled air blocking out the otherwise sunny sky above should give us all pause about how we have historically celebrated the 4th with fireworks. Everything about life as we had come to expect it is now in flux: hotter summers, warmer winters, more frequent and more severe weather, rising sea levels, worsening air quality, more global pandemics. We are a caring, educated and progressive community and, as such, as we observe the disruptions to the planet that human activity is causing; isn't it time to ban the use of fireworks due to the smoke and noise pollution as well as the toxins including lead that are released into the air and which then enter our lungs, enter the ground and our water both surface and underground.

The Mount Greylock wells were contaminated by the annual fireworks displays that used to be held there. Now the college is hosting fireworks at the Taconic Golf Course. Surely the damage being done is hardly worth the expense or the hour of thrills (?) the few who attend experience. There are better totally safe and more enjoyable ways to celebrate such as a light show. The Chamber (supported by local businesses and our taxes) and the Select Board (using our tax dollars) which are paying for the show should make this the last year for fireworks and plan on a healthy, responsible, planet-friendly alternative in the future.

It is my hope that readers will recognize this appeal is to our better selves. It is not anti-American, it is pro-health, pro-environment, and pro-gressive (time for change).

I am hoping readers throughout the county will join in the effort and movement to end the costly, dangerous, and toxic displays. Many household pets are terrified of the sound and of course the wildlife in our surrounding forests are as well but they have no voice. If they could speak, they would say how damaging it is to their sensitive hearing, how terrifying for them and their young, and how badly it smells that they forage and eat plants and drink water that have been contaminated from the fallout.

What of some of those who have fought in wars for our freedom and come home with PTSD? Some of them find the loud noise and bright lights bring back traumatic memories.

In other words, there is probably only a small minority of citizens who actually enjoy the fireworks and thrill to the sounds and light. There are safe alternatives. We should honor and celebrate in a manner that doesn't add to the harm being done to the planet, wildlife, and even ourselves.
 

Paul A. Harsch III
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 


Tags: fireworks,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

AG Clears Williamstown Select Board in Open Meeting Complaint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Attorney General's Office on Wednesday cleared the Select Board in an Open Meeting Law complaint filed by iBerkshires.com while simultaneously confirming the supposition at the heart of the complaint.
 
The AGO found that the board did technically violate the OML when it moved to executive session on May 11, a misstep the board previously acknowledged in its response to the complaint.
 
The meeting in question was held behind closed doors to discuss the town's response to a proposal from Williams College to acquire the former town garage site at 59 Water St.
 
At the time of the May 11 meeting, the board had held no public discussion, let alone a vote, on whether to enter into negotiations with Williams, the lone respondent to a request for proposals issued by the town for the 1.27-acre parcel.
 
The board cited an exception to the Open Meeting Law that states executive sessions are appropriate if, "holding the discussion in open session may have a detrimental effect on the Board's negotiating position."
 
iBerkshires.com maintained in its complaint that the executive session was premature given the fact that the board on May 11 had no one to negotiate with as it had not agreed — publicly — to negotiate with the college.
 
The news organization cited the fact that the town's RFP clearly indicated a multi-step process in which the board first would decide whether to engage with any of the respondents (assuming multiple bids were made) and then enter into negotiation with one of the respondents.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories