image description
Firefighters are mopping up a blaze on Cromwell Avenue that occurred around 2 p.m. on Thursday afternoon.

Pittsfield Fire Guts Home, Sends Occupant to Hospital

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The building is considered a total loss. 
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A fire on Thursday afternoon severely damaged a home at 89 Cromwell Ave. and sent its owner to the hospital. 
 
"We got here, there was already heavy fire. The whole back of the building was involved and it was pushing out the front porch. So the whole first floor was involved," said Fire Chief Thomas Sammons. "Both stories were just blown."
 
The balloon-frame structure allowed the fire to get into the attic of the two-story home before firefighters could cut it off, he said, which compounded the problem. 
 
Linda Boyd was the only one home at the time and had been able to flee the structure. There apparently was a question of some pets in the building that the chief was unable to answer. Boyd was treated on scene and transported to Berkshire Medical Center with smoke inhalation. As of Thursday night, according to Deputy Chief Daniel Garner, she had been discharged and she and her adult son are being assisted by the American Red Cross.
 
The single-family home dates to around 1930.
 
Neighbor Michael Connors said he could see flames as he turned on to Cromwell and was calling 911 when he saw the Boyd just outside of the enclosed front porch.
 
"I just pulled up and the place was on fire and I helped her, I got her off the step and brought her over here," Connors said. "I just jumped out of the car and went over to help her. It was so hot over there. And then another couple came up behind me ... They helped me carry her across the street."
 
The whole back of the house appeared to be in flames, he said, and then it was coming out through the front windows. 
 
A section of Cromwell, a well-tended street of mostly single-family homes, was expected to be closed at the scene for another few hours as firefighters wrapped up their work. 
 
Sammons, who had been at the scene from the start, said the initial response was three engines, a command vehicle and two ambulances from County and possibly and Action Ambulance. There was a slight delay in getting another engine because of a heart attack occurring at the same time on the other side of the city but in the end two truck companies responded. 
 
"I don't come unless it's a double alarm. But during the day I come anyway, and there was a lot of work to do right off the bat," he said. 
 
It was about two hours after the fire began that the scene was in "overhaul mode," the chief said. "We had to transition our attack because we couldn't get in the building. So we use ladder/pipe operations. We cut holes in the roof and then the rafters had failed because of the fire load. ...
 
"The ladder truck put a lot of fire out and then we started entering the building on ladders to put the fire out in the attack."
 
It was not clear who made the initial 911 call but Connors thought Boyd indicated that she had. 
 
This was a very well-developed, fast-moving fire that was aided by the 'balloon-frame' construction characteristics which allowed for fire travel among void spaces in the walls, Garner wrote in his report released late Thursday. "The shortcoming of this type of construction can be it typically doesn't have the 'fire stop' protection that common wood 'platform-frame' construction affords."
 
The building was later deemed a near total loss with partial collapse of the roof and heavy fire damage throughout. There was no estimate on the dollar loss.
 
"It was a lot of work. That's what we trained for. They did a good job," Sammons said of the department. "It's just every now and then. There is a delay. Obviously there was a delay before they made the call but that happens."
 
Updated with new information and the name of the owner at 9:49 p.m.

Tags: structure fire,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories