image description
The School Building Needs Commission is given a presentation Tuesday on a survey sent to the school community and other stakeholders.
image description

Pittsfield Restructuring Survey Garners Engagement, Planners Faced with Alignment Options

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Pittsfield school district's restructuring survey garnered more than 2,800 responses from students, parents, staff, and community members.

Representatives with DRA Architects, the firm conducting the study, told the School Building Needs Commission on Tuesday that they are pleased with the level of participation. This is coupled with a number of community forums to hear directly from the Pittsfield Public School community and beyond.

Nearly 1,470 students responded to the survey with the highest response rates coming from Reid Middle School and Egremont Elementary School with well over 200 responses each. In contrast, Herberg Middle School had less than 60 responses.

Overall, students gave their schools a 7.16 safety rating out of 10 and a 6.77 happiness rating.

More than 560 students said the schools are too hot too often and nearly half, or about 650 students, rated the technology as "acceptable."

Just under 770 parents and guardians responded and the city's two high schools — Taconic and Pittsfield High — had the most engagement from parents with around 150 each.

This group gave the facilities' ability to support their child's education a 3.71 out of five rating and the layout's ability to support student success a 3.58 rating.

Some 514 teachers and staff total responded and largely from Pittsfield High School, which had 94 responses. Overall satisfaction with the schools was rated 6.41 out of 10 and 6.69 for appropriateness to the work that is being done.

Staff members gave the district heating, cooling, windows, doors, water supply, electricity, and lighting a low score of 4.37 out of 10. The parking, walkways, stairs, and ramps were rated 5.77 out of 10, and vehicle and pedestrian travel paths were rated 6.18.

The safety and age appropriateness of playgrounds were given a 6.54 out of 10.

Just over 90 residents and business owners responded and gave the schools a 5.87 out of 10 for preparing students for success.


The commission also had a discussion about grade alignments and the possibility of universal pre-kindergarten.

Six potential alignments have been proposed that include the current three-school progression with and without universal pre-k, a four-school progression, and a five-school progression. Every option proposes a reduction in total facilities from the 12 elementary, middle, and high schools.

The architects said the alignment that divides schools by pre-kindergarten through first grade, Grades 2 through 4, Grades 5 and 6, Grades 7 and 8, and Grades 9 through 12 has the most potential. This would require a total of 10 facilities and is said to offer considerable upsides in terms of cohort continuity, socio-economic diversity, and parity across the schools.

"The one that seems to really have the most traction and make the most sense from a facilities cohort side and a regular arrangement seems to be [Alignment] 5," DRA's Greg Smolley explained. "And that's kind of the point that we need to discuss further with this group and with the school administration to get a starting point for where we go with this."

DRA's Carl Franceschi added that a common size for multiple schools would bring parity or equality, and it would have to be mapped in the existing buildings to see how it works.

"From a master planning point of view, we want to take the starting point of trying to address the issue of parity that no matter where you live or what school you get assigned to or choose to go to, the curriculum and the facilities offer comparable educational opportunities," he said.

During one of the community meetings, a resident expressed concern about the impact that universal pre-K would have on the existing pre-K providers and asked if there could be some sort of collaboration with them.

Member Tonya Frasier reported that a lot of community members have been on a waitlist since their child was three and that if there was more capacity for universal pre-K there would be more enrollment.

"I'm worried about those children that are falling behind because they're not in a structure of working with other peers their age, getting onto a schedule, everything like that," she said.

Transportation is also a consideration with the proposal of new alignments and the addition of universal pre-K.

By the end of the month, there will be a public presentation on the final report with community engagement and in December through January, materials will be compiled for filing a statement of interest.


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   school building committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Planners Hold Public Hearing on Tiny Homes Bylaw

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing last week on a bylaw for mobile accessory dwelling units (ADU) that will be brought before a special town meeting.

For nearly two years, Amy Turnbull has been trying to amend the current ADU bylaws to allow mobile tiny homes.  

A movable tiny home is defined as a unit under 400 square feet that meets all of someone's daily needs, including sanitation, cooking, and other facilities, and which is also mobile. Most homes considered "tiny" are built on a trailer so they can be towed.

Her proposal defines a movable tiny house as a "residential property with an existing primary house, intended for year-round living," and outlines eight conditions for approval.

Among these conditions: the unit must adhere to accessory dwelling unit regulations, undergo site plan review, be licensed and registered with the state Registry of Motor Vehicles, have approved energy, water, and wastewater systems, and comply with American National Standards Institute 119.5 and National Fire Protection Association 1192 safety requirements.

Additionally, the unit must be certified for ANSI or NFPA compliance by a manufacturer or third-party inspector, including adherence to Appendix Q and the International Residential Code's structural guidelines and energy efficiency standards. The tiny house cannot move under its own power, and its undercarriage, wheels, axles, tongue, and hitch must be concealed from view. Wheels and leveling or support jacks are required to rest on a level gravel or paved surface.

Turnbull has gotten enough signatures for her petition to amend the current bylaws to add her definition of the mobile ADUs. Last Wednesday, the board held a public hearing on the petitions, which will be voted on at a special meeting.

Turnbull says she has two reasons for wanting to add this to the town's bylaws: aging in place and affordable housing.

"We need a variety of housing types in Dalton, and that we also need to address the idea that you know nearly 30 percent of our population by 2035 is going to be over 65 years old, and it's problematic because  ... there's not enough choice for these people to to age in place,"she said. "What movable tiny houses does, is it provides a less restrictive ADU. It's much cheaper to place, and it's easier to place, less time consuming. And what it offers to people is it offers people who are owners a place for their children to come and live, or a caregiver to come and live, or for the people who own their own house to come and live while they rent out their maybe their three bedroom home to a new family who wants to attend to Craneville simultaneously."

She said people need to move away from calling and treating the tiny homes as though they are trailers, as one former Planning Board member has voiced opinions on.

"That is an opinion, and I think we need to get over that, because I want to say that these are foundation homes, and that the chassis is a foundation, and it's a stick-built home on a chassis, and in very many ways it's like a modular house. I think we will not be surprised in the next 10 years if we see the market turn around and start to make smaller, tiny modular homes, but that is not the case right now, and we have a dire need for affordable housing," she said.

At a former Fire District meeting the Water Department drafted regulations for water hook-ups for these types of homes. The superintendent sent a letter to the Planning Board to be read at the meeting stating it will not be a hindrance for sewer system connection.

"The Department of Public Works does not feel that mobile ADUs will be an issue with the town sewer system. The homeowners will be responsible for any issues outside of the sewer main and connect and responsible for connecting in, so that would address any permits, fees, or anything like that would be added to that," the letter states. 

"The Water Department, as we've stated previous, and as you stated, the water department has come up with their own set of SOPs, standard operating procedures, for hooking up a an adu and a mobile adu, which will then have to meet winterization and all those, but they've laid out a plan for that, that they have, so I'd like to point that out," board Chair Robert Collins said.

One concern was raised that if someone can have a mobile ADU could they also have another tiny home on their property, including the main house. That situation is not likely, said Turnbull, as it would cost a considerable amount of money. Town Manager Eric Anderson also stated that in his former community when they adopted similar laws their first one wasn’t put in until a couple years later and then maybe one a year.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories