image description
A melee that broke out at Sportsman's Cafe won't result in any penalties for the bar after the Licensing Board determined its staff acted appropriately.

Pittsfield Board Says Club Responded Properly to 'Melee'

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Licensing Board chose not to penalize a Peck's Road bar for a melee that resulted in one arrest.

The panel voted Monday to file a show-cause hearing for the Sportsman's Cafe following a large fight on Dec. 10. It was determined that the owners responded appropriately.

"This is the first incident for this owner of the bar. I think they took appropriate action to remove the individual from the premises," board member Jody Phillips said.

"Unfortunately, you couldn't control what happened outside afterward."

Around 12:50 a.m. that Sunday, several officers responded to the Sportsman's for a report of a fight between 10 to 20 people outside. When officers arrived, they saw about 10 people between the bar and the parking lot across the street.

After speaking to witnesses and involved parties, the police concluded that an assault had taken place between a man and his girlfriend, the disturbance then spread between the man and others within the bar and then moved outside and across the street.

"The incident was brought to my attention and has resulted in me bringing forth this request for a show cause hearing before the board," Lt. Matthew Hill explained.

Co-owner Jonathan Griffin explained that his partner Mike Martino was at the bar until midnight and when he left there were two doormen and a bartender.

"This guy ended up attacking his own fiancée. He ended up punching her in the face several times," Griffin said, adding that the man was reportedly from out of town and was not recognized.



In response, the staff worked to remove the man from the establishment. At one point, one of his friends attacked one of the security guards, which resulted in an arrest and charges.

"Once he started attacking my security guy, a couple of customers tried to intervene to try to help, which didn't really help," Griffin said. "And then it just, like I said it turned into a melee."

The tapes from that night were reviewed with staff and they spoke about ways to better handle the situation, he added, and they are feeling better prepared.

Officers reported that they could control the scene and everyone separated pretty well, eventually dispersing to their cars across the street. When the first officer arrived, he reported that about 10 individuals were "blocking Peck's Road" from the front of the bar to the parking lot arguing.

Board member Kathy Amuso said that sometimes licensees come before the board and they don't seem to take responsibility, and while she believes things did get out of hand, the response was appropriate.

"I think the fact that the security guard at least tried to get the guy outside of the building, which was the responsible thing to do," board member Dennis Powell said.

Also on Monday, the board filed a show cause hearing for Thistle and Mirth after a stabbing on Thanksgiving Eve. Since the incident, the owners rebranded and reduced hours to curb that behavior and the board was satisfied with the actions taken.


Tags: license board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Peru Selectman Pays $3K Penalty for Conflict of Interest

PERU, Mass. — A Select Board member has been fined $3,000 for helping create a paid town job he intended to apply for, and then worked in.
 
Edward Munch has paid a $3,000 civil penalty for violating the conflict of interest law by participating in creating the paid maintenance position he intended to apply for and then working in the new job while still on the Select Board. The State Ethics Commission approved a Disposition Agreement in which Munch admitted to the violations, paid the civil penalty, and waived his right to a public hearing.
 
During a December 2024 Select Board meeting, Munch asserted the need for a maintenance person at Town Hall. The need for the position was discussed at the following meeting and Munch said he would like to apply for it. During subsequent Select Board meetings, Munch continued to participate in discussions relating to the position, including its job description, schedule, and pay rate. The Select Board ultimately approved the position, with Munch abstaining from the vote.
 
After the maintenance position was publicly posted in the summer of 2025, Munch applied for it. He and another candidate were interviewed by the two other Select Board members, who subsequently voted to appoint Munch to the position. 
 
Munch worked in the position, which remained under the supervision of the Select Board, until March 2026, when he left the position after being notified the State Ethics Commission was investigating the matter. He earned just over $3,000 in the position.
 
The conflict of interest law prohibits municipal employees from participating in their official capacity in matters in which they have a reasonably foreseeable financial interest. Although Munch abstained from voting on the maintenance position, he violated this prohibition each time he discussed the position substantively as a Select Board member. Munch also violated the law's prohibitions against municipal board members serving in positions appointed by and under the supervision of their own board and its prohibition against municipal employees holding a financial interest in a contract made by the municipality.
 
"When an elected public official encourages and takes part in government actions they know will create an economic opportunity for themself, the public has cause to ask whether those actions served the official's personal financial interest rather than the public interest," said State Ethics Commission Executive Director David A. Wilson. "Not engaging in such self-serving conduct is essential if elected officials are to build and maintain public confidence in the integrity of their public service and avoid the serious negative consequences of violating the conflict of interest law."   
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories