image description

Pittsfield Public School Budget Cuts Trigger Little Feedback at Hearing

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Few people attended a school budget hearing explaining the need to cut more than 100 Pittsfield Public School employees.

On Wednesday, two special education employees spoke about the importance of preserving positions within their department. Included in the proposed districtwide reductions are 27 teachers, 26 paraprofessionals, and seven instruction and accountability coordinators.

Special Education Coordinator Joanne McGill shared her experience over the last couple of years at Pittsfield High School, saying, "I am well aware that even some cuts will likely result in me losing my position as I am one of the newer employees.

"In those two years I feel like me and the other special education coordinator have I have been able to work within the building has really made a significant amount of progress towards kind of just different initiatives that we have attempted to help put into place to make the environment move smoother."

McGill said the new individualized education plan forms posed a challenge this year and that she has concerns about limiting positions.

"I feel very strongly that our special-education students are going to be harmed in losing some of the experts that have really worked hard to develop meaningful IEPs and have learned the coaching skills to support the teachers in implementing them," she said.

"This year alone with the caseload (individualized education coordinators) we are working with, it's just a heavy load and we're working and making that progress and I'm just afraid of backtracking on all of that progress looking at the possibility of less IECs and more of that pressure on our special education teachers."

Paraprofessional Maeve Murray began her position at Egremont Elementary School last year after about 22 years of residential programs. It has been eye-opening for her to see the teachers and staff work with all of the things that come up each day.



"It just seems superduper important that not just my role but everybody that works with the special education kids be there," she said.

Murray added that one of the teachers she works with recently said, "I don't know what what would happen if you weren't here on a day-to-day basis" and that she loves working for the school system, as it is a "really profound thing."

Much of the impact on the budget is attributed to the September sunsetting of the federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds that were created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and not as much in state Chapter 70 education funding as in previous years.

For FY25, the district is anticipating a 3.5 percent increase from this year's budget appropriation totaling $80,821,096, about $2.7 million more. With anticipated contractual increases and other spending obligations reaching more than $6.4 million, a local budget shortfall of almost $3.7 million is anticipated not including the discontinued ESSER funds. That $3.7 million gap has brought a proposal for a level number of reductions.

Superintendent Joseph Curtis pointed out that there will be a second budget workshop on March 27 that will include a line item overview. It will begin with a televised overview and then break into smaller groups to discuss the presentation.

"We will be switching the format slightly to ensure that the detailed budget overview including the line item budget overview will be its own meeting to be televised by Pittsfield Community Television and so that the community will have full access to the presentation and the documentation certainly that we post to our district website," he said.

This will take place at Reid Middle School at 5:30 p.m. The budget is expected to be approved April 25 and the School Committee is expected to meet with the City Council to discuss it no later than June 1.


Tags: fiscal 2025,   pittsfield_budget,   school budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Peru Selectman Pays $3K Penalty for Conflict of Interest

PERU, Mass. — A Select Board member has been fined $3,000 for helping create a paid town job he intended to apply for, and then worked in.
 
Edward Munch has paid a $3,000 civil penalty for violating the conflict of interest law by participating in creating the paid maintenance position he intended to apply for and then working in the new job while still on the Select Board. The State Ethics Commission approved a Disposition Agreement in which Munch admitted to the violations, paid the civil penalty, and waived his right to a public hearing.
 
During a December 2024 Select Board meeting, Munch asserted the need for a maintenance person at Town Hall. The need for the position was discussed at the following meeting and Munch said he would like to apply for it. During subsequent Select Board meetings, Munch continued to participate in discussions relating to the position, including its job description, schedule, and pay rate. The Select Board ultimately approved the position, with Munch abstaining from the vote.
 
After the maintenance position was publicly posted in the summer of 2025, Munch applied for it. He and another candidate were interviewed by the two other Select Board members, who subsequently voted to appoint Munch to the position. 
 
Munch worked in the position, which remained under the supervision of the Select Board, until March 2026, when he left the position after being notified the State Ethics Commission was investigating the matter. He earned just over $3,000 in the position.
 
The conflict of interest law prohibits municipal employees from participating in their official capacity in matters in which they have a reasonably foreseeable financial interest. Although Munch abstained from voting on the maintenance position, he violated this prohibition each time he discussed the position substantively as a Select Board member. Munch also violated the law's prohibitions against municipal board members serving in positions appointed by and under the supervision of their own board and its prohibition against municipal employees holding a financial interest in a contract made by the municipality.
 
"When an elected public official encourages and takes part in government actions they know will create an economic opportunity for themself, the public has cause to ask whether those actions served the official's personal financial interest rather than the public interest," said State Ethics Commission Executive Director David A. Wilson. "Not engaging in such self-serving conduct is essential if elected officials are to build and maintain public confidence in the integrity of their public service and avoid the serious negative consequences of violating the conflict of interest law."   
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories