image description

Pittsfield Public School Budget Cuts Trigger Little Feedback at Hearing

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Few people attended a school budget hearing explaining the need to cut more than 100 Pittsfield Public School employees.

On Wednesday, two special education employees spoke about the importance of preserving positions within their department. Included in the proposed districtwide reductions are 27 teachers, 26 paraprofessionals, and seven instruction and accountability coordinators.

Special Education Coordinator Joanne McGill shared her experience over the last couple of years at Pittsfield High School, saying, "I am well aware that even some cuts will likely result in me losing my position as I am one of the newer employees.

"In those two years I feel like me and the other special education coordinator have I have been able to work within the building has really made a significant amount of progress towards kind of just different initiatives that we have attempted to help put into place to make the environment move smoother."

McGill said the new individualized education plan forms posed a challenge this year and that she has concerns about limiting positions.

"I feel very strongly that our special-education students are going to be harmed in losing some of the experts that have really worked hard to develop meaningful IEPs and have learned the coaching skills to support the teachers in implementing them," she said.

"This year alone with the caseload (individualized education coordinators) we are working with, it's just a heavy load and we're working and making that progress and I'm just afraid of backtracking on all of that progress looking at the possibility of less IECs and more of that pressure on our special education teachers."

Paraprofessional Maeve Murray began her position at Egremont Elementary School last year after about 22 years of residential programs. It has been eye-opening for her to see the teachers and staff work with all of the things that come up each day.



"It just seems superduper important that not just my role but everybody that works with the special education kids be there," she said.

Murray added that one of the teachers she works with recently said, "I don't know what what would happen if you weren't here on a day-to-day basis" and that she loves working for the school system, as it is a "really profound thing."

Much of the impact on the budget is attributed to the September sunsetting of the federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds that were created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and not as much in state Chapter 70 education funding as in previous years.

For FY25, the district is anticipating a 3.5 percent increase from this year's budget appropriation totaling $80,821,096, about $2.7 million more. With anticipated contractual increases and other spending obligations reaching more than $6.4 million, a local budget shortfall of almost $3.7 million is anticipated not including the discontinued ESSER funds. That $3.7 million gap has brought a proposal for a level number of reductions.

Superintendent Joseph Curtis pointed out that there will be a second budget workshop on March 27 that will include a line item overview. It will begin with a televised overview and then break into smaller groups to discuss the presentation.

"We will be switching the format slightly to ensure that the detailed budget overview including the line item budget overview will be its own meeting to be televised by Pittsfield Community Television and so that the community will have full access to the presentation and the documentation certainly that we post to our district website," he said.

This will take place at Reid Middle School at 5:30 p.m. The budget is expected to be approved April 25 and the School Committee is expected to meet with the City Council to discuss it no later than June 1.


Tags: fiscal 2025,   pittsfield_budget,   school budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public comment on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and had public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories