Berkshire County Regional Housing Renamed 'UpSide413"

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire County Regional Housing Authority is now called UpSide413, a name that "symbolizes an upward journey towards improvement."

The new alias was announced on Friday after a months-long selection process and was well received by those involved with the organization. The word "authority" is seen as counter-intuitive and 100 percent of stakeholders were in favor of the change.

The new name will not change its work, as it is meant to clarify the services that are offered and the core mission.  

"We really wanted a brand or a name that was positive but also uplifting and had that feel to it, but also was a destination," Executive Director Brad Gordon explained.

"And I feel like ‘upside' is a destination actually. We wanted it to feel like a destination for people."

Director of Housing, Legal, and Consumer Services Kristen Curtin was thrilled to start the rebranding process because she has seen firsthand how much it has outgrown the former name.

"I think it was a very thoughtful and deliberate process which sometimes would wake me up at night in a good way," she said.

"I think you will all agree that the new brand really captures that aspirational and positive tone, which is what I think was really needed."

Director of Tenancy Preservation Program/Related Services Kim Borden said that the most important piece is that the name meets the organization's goals "and the goal was to find a name that exuded positivity, diversity, collaboration, just to name a few."

Board member Jay Sacchetti said the name "jumped out" at him and the rebrand will generate conversation about UpSide413.

"It's nice to see a name have positive flavor to it and getting away from all that traditional stuff," he said. "I think that makes people much more comfortable to walk through the front door."

Burns Maxey of the firm Burnsmax was hired to direct the rebranding. Through surveys and interviews of staff members and others with a stake in the organization, it became clear that the name came off as too authoritative.

"This was the point that the word 'authority' came up as being really counterintuitive to the organization and how it doesn't really quite fit the organization and the work that you do," Maxey explained.



"Often I have seen in written works such as annual reports or when staff members are talking about the organization, the first thing they say is what they're not, 'We are not on how a traditional housing authority,' rather than saying what you are, which is what you want to be talking about."

Aside from the misleading nature, it was concluded that the name has been outgrown because the organization's efforts have transcended just housing, though it remains a core focus. Resources such as legal counseling, dispute resolution options, case management support, consumer protection advocacy, and educational forums are provided to ensure clients well being.

The organization has also increased the geographic reach of the Tenancy Preservation Program to serve residents in the Pioneer Valley.

"There were some important aspects that the leadership team really wanted to make sure that the new name captured: that it uses an aspirational and positive tone, it's catchy and memorable, it's not overused in the field, it is unique but has a familiarity to it," Maxey reported.

"Accessibility inclusivity is a big part of the organization so appealing to a broad range of clients as well as being linguistically understandable to a wide range including families, veterans, the houseless, non-English speaking people, and organization partners was important."

Gordon explained that it was an iterative process of integrating all these factors and involved some productive frustration going back and forth between potential names.

"We spent a session really naming these guidance principles, which I think really helped us focus in a more effective manner and guiding us to reach the decision that we reached," he said.

The process officially began in September last year when the board approved the hiring of Burns Maxey to take the lead on its rebranding.

This transition won't happen overnight and the organization will phase in new branded materials, the new logo, updating the social media accounts and website, and answering phones with the new name.

BCRHA will remain the organization's name for filing purposes and it will be doing business as UpSide413 when the new name is officially rolled out in July.

An updated biography on the organization reads:

Based in Pittsfield, MA, UpSide413 promotes household, housing, and community stability through a continuum of interrelated service options. UpSide413 provides various support services aimed at empowering individuals and families to achieve stability in their homes and communities. These services include housing, legal and consumer counseling services, intensive case management and other tenancy preservation and housing stability resources, community based and court connected dispute resolution options, and more in Berkshire County and extending to the Pioneer Valley region.

By offering a comprehensive range of services for over 30 years, UpSide413 aims to address the multi-faceted needs of individuals and communities, ultimately contributing to greater stability and well-being for all involved. Formerly the Berkshire County Regional Housing Authority, UpSide413 is a regional housing authority organized in 1980 pursuant to MGL, Chapter 121, Section 3A. BCRHA's original mission was to serve as a local housing authority for those 23 towns in Berkshire County that do not have a local housing authority.


Tags: Housing Authority,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories