Mass Unemployment and Job Estimates for April 2024

Print Story | Email Story

BOSTON, MA — May 17, 2024 – The state's April total unemployment rate was 2.9 percent, unchanged from the revised March estimate of 2.9 percent, the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development announced Friday.

The Massachusetts unemployment rate was 1.0 percentage point lower than the national rate of 3.9 percent reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Over-the-year, the state's seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was down by 0.3 percentage points.

The labor force increased by an estimated 12,200 from the revised estimate of 3,757,000 in March, with 10,100 residents more employed and 1,900 more residents unemployed over-the-month. The state's labor force participation rate – the total number of residents 16 or older who worked or were unemployed and actively sought work in the last four weeks – increased 0.2 percentage points over-the-month, to 65.1 percent. Compared to April 2023, the labor force participation rate was unchanged.

The BLS preliminary job estimates indicate Massachusetts lost 500 jobs in April. This follows March's revised loss of 4,100 jobs. The largest over-the-month private sector job gains were in Education and Health Services, Professional, Scientific, and Business Services, and Trade, Transportation, and Utilities. Employment now stands at 3,733,000. Massachusetts gained 669,500 jobs since the employment low in April 2020.

From April 2023 to April 2024, BLS estimates Massachusetts gained 21,800 jobs. The largest over-the-year gains occurred in Education and Health Services, Leisure and Hospitality, and Government.

April 2024 Employment Overview

Education and Health Services gained 1,900 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 17,900 were added.

Professional, Scientific, and Business Services gained 800 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 5,500 were lost.

Trade, Transportation, and Utilities gained 600 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 2,100 were lost.

Construction gained 200 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 4,000 were added.

Government gained 200 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 5,100 were added.

Information lost 200 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 4,400 were lost.

Financial Activities lost 500 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 200 were added.

Manufacturing lost 600 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 3,500 were lost.

Other Services lost 900 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 3,300 were added.

Leisure and Hospitality lost 1,900 jobs over-the-month. Over-the-year, 6,800 were added.

Labor Force Overview

The April estimates show 3,659,900 Massachusetts residents were employed and 109,200 were unemployed, for a total labor force of 3,769,200. The unemployment rate at 2.9 percent was unchanged from the revised March rate of 2.9 percent. Over-the-month, the April labor force increased by 12,200 from 3,757,000 in March, with 10,100 more residents employed and 1,900 more residents unemployed. The labor force participation rate, the share of the working age population employed and unemployed, increased by 0.2 percentage points to 65.1 percent. The labor force was up 21,300 from the April 2023 estimate of 3,747,900 following the annual revision, with 33,600 more employed residents, and 12,400 fewer unemployed residents.

The unemployment rate is based on a monthly sample of households. The job estimates are derived from a monthly sample survey of employers. As a result, the two statistics may exhibit different monthly trends.

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Board Balance Needed on Dalton Public Safety Advisory Committee

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

I share Dave Martindale's concerns about appointing individuals with actual or perceived conflicts of interest to the newly formed Public Safety Facility Advisory Committee leadership. Several committee members either represent departments that would occupy and directly benefit from the proposed facility or have personal connections to those individuals, raising concerns about the committee's ability to impartially balance a best-in-class facility against a cost-conscious solution.

While their perspectives are valuable, the committee would benefit from a more balanced membership that includes independent residents focused on affordability, long-term planning, and the town's broader financial obligations.

I support the town's decision to explore a combined public safety facility. However, the police station needs assessment should be revisited before the town advances a specific plan. The assessment projects a 32 percent increase in total call volume and a 68 percent increase in staffing by 2045. Those projections are unrealistic based on historical call volume, crime statistics trends and the town's financial outlook — particularly when future budget constraints may require staffing reductions.

The town has already invested considerable time and money pursuing a standalone police station after previously rejecting a combined facility. Now that a joint facility is again under consideration, residents deserve a transparent process based on realistic projections and a cost-conscious evaluation of the town's actual needs.

The town manager and Select Board should consider adding neutral community members to the committee and designating the police chief and interim fire chief as non-voting advisers. They should also revise the needs assessment using supportable staffing, call volume, and population assumptions. A public safety facility is a significant long-term investment, and the town should ensure that the final proposal balances public safety needs with fiscal responsibility.

Amy Lennin
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories