Letter: Look for Facts in Bias Incidents

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

The May 13, 2024, article entitled "'The Roof is Caving In': Mount Greylock School Committee Hears Details of Bias Incidents." If reported accurately, and if I interpreted the article correctly, Mr. Dravis brought to light some extremely troublesome issues. If prejudice is occurring routinely in our schools and elsewhere in town, especially in those institutions under the auspice of town governance, a clearly reasoned plan must be created and implemented.

Also troubling in the article was "… the meeting also features some of the most frank commentary to date from district administrators about the shortcomings of the preK-12 district's efforts to address the problem." There are other quotes from the district leadership that indicated that as Superintendent McCandless said, "We are really just trying to find mechanisms that actually work. We have invested a great deal of money into this work, and as evidenced tonight by the things people didn't want to be saying because they're living in pain at home-the things we're doing aren't working."

Was any conclusion reached that indicated the next step? It seemed that some believed adding additional DEI efforts were in order. It seemed that others believed we should rethink the whole DEI movement.

Might the next step in addressing the prejudice "crisis" be to look for facts? Narratives are extremely important, and should be taken very seriously, but a closer investigation that values the facts of the alleged incidents might reveal different and/or additional perspectives.



Is there anyone who can argue that DEI is not a controversial approach to combatting intolerance? Is there anyone who can argue it has not furthered divisions in our community? It is difficult to judge because so many people are silent. How do we know what the community thinks? What they value?

Might we use our current confusion and frustration to revisit how DEI was introduced to the town? Was there an attempt to calmly encourage discussion with townspeople who questioned (not even challenged) the principles and strategies inherent in DEI before those principles were put into place ? Were there clearly stated MEASURABLE goals shared with townsfolk that could serve as a basis now as to how we should go forward? Taxpayers are, after all, are expected to pay the bills.

No question that mistakes have been made and by many people on all sides of the tolerance issue. Let us try to correct those mistakes and move on to create a tolerant and flourishing community.

Donna Wied
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts for Signage Over Pub Closure

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Board of Health on Monday voted unanimously not to revoke the license of a South Williamstown restaurant that has been operating under a boil water order from the state Department of Environmental Protection since December.
 
Instead the board ordered the '6 House Pub to use more prominent signage to notify patrons of the order, called for more frequent inspections by the town's health inspector and warned the restaurant that even one instance of E. coli contamination tied to the establishment will be grounds for revocation.
 
Michael Oring, the owner of the '6 House and 1896 House Inn on Cold Spring Road (Route 7) appeared before the board along with his attorney, Thane Preite, and members of the '6 House staff to explain how the restaurant has operated under the boil water order and how it plans to address replacement of a well that serves the restaurant in the short and long term.
 
The '6 House is one of a handful of Williamstown eating establishments that operate outside the town's water district.
 
On Dec. 20, 2023, DEP issued a boil-water order for the restaurant, Health Inspector Ruth Russell told the board. Since that time, the restaurant has been serving bottled water and soda, bringing in bags of ice and boiling all water used in food preparation. It also has turned off the water in the sinks in its public restrooms.
 
Great Barrington Health Agent Rebecca Jurczyk, who has been mentoring Russell since she was hired by Williamstown, said corrective measures like bottled water, etc., generally are temporary. And Jurczyk advised the board that it should pull the restaurant's license rather than allow it to continue with those measures.
 
"I don't like to close businesses," Jurczyk said. "That's not what we do in Great Barrington. We don't willy-nilly close businesses. I can count on one hand the number of times I've closed a restaurant, and it's always because of a water issue. Most of the time, it's very temporary.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories