image description
The Wright building project on North Street is getting $4 million in state grants.

State Boosts North Street Housing Project With $4M

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Mayor Peter Marchetti, standing between Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll, left, and Gov. Maura Healey attends the announcement of some $27 million in housing grants in Lowell. Also pictured are Housing and Livable Communities Secretary Edward Augustus, Pittsfield's Community Development Director Justine Dodds and Lou Allegrone, principal at Allegrone Companies.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A North Street housing project was awarded more than $4 million through the state's Housing Development Incentive Program.

Mayor Peter Marchetti and Community Development Director Justine Dodds traveled to Lowell on Tuesday for the announcement of $27 million in HDIP awards — $4,099,686 going to Allegrone Construction Co.'s redevelopment of the historic Wright Building and the Jim's House of Shoes property.

The two were joined by Lou Allegrone.

"Another win for Pittsfield!" Marchetti wrote in a Facebook post.

Pittsfield received the largest award, the next highest was $2.5 million. The Wright project will be in two phases: $2,581,672 to fund 21 units and $1,518,014 for 14 units.

The $27 million HDIP package aims to create nearly 550 new units in 11 gateway cities across the state.

Allegrone's $17.8 million project will combine the two buildings into one development, retaining the commercial storefronts on North Street and providing 35 new rental units, 28 of which will be market-rate units and seven of which will be affordable. It will retain the historic facade of the Wright Building and the commercial store frontage on North Street.

Initial market-rate rent proposals range from $1,500 to $1,800 for a one-bedroom and $2,000 to $2,200 for a two-bedroom, based on unit size. Affordable units are proposed at $950 for a studio, $1,100 for a one-bedroom, and $1,402 for a two-bedroom.  

The Healey-Driscoll administration says HDIP is a tool for the state's Gateway Cities to create more market-rate housing to support economic development, expand the diversity of housing stock, and create more vibrant neighborhoods.



Last fall, as part of a $1 billion tax cuts package, the annual HDIP program cap was raised from $10 million to $57 million in 2023 and will be $30 million annually going forward. That increase allowed the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities to fund all 13 project applications this round.

The city approved a 10-year tax increment financing agreement with the developer with a savings of over $400,000 through that period. It is a requirement to receive state tax credits through the HDIP.

The TIE freezes the current property values and base value, and phases in the increased property taxes that result from the upgrades, beginning at 100 percent forgiveness in the first year and decreasing by 10 percent each subsequent year over the term.

The current assessed value of the properties is $497,900 for the Wright Building and $229,900 for the former Jim's House of Shoes property. The redevelopment of these buildings is projected to increase the assessed value of each property to more than $2.5 million and more than $1.9 million, respectively.

The city approved a Housing Development Zone in 2012 to take advantage of the state Housing Development Incentive Program that supports market-rate housing development in gateway cities. The city can provide a TIE for newly created market-rate housing in the zone to private developers and for the projects to be eligible for up to $1 million in tax credits from the state through the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities and the Department of Revenue.

Dodds has previously explained that incentives are needed to expand the diversity of available housing, balance market-rate and affordable units, increase residential growth, and supplement existing affordable housing projects. It was also emphasized that this project will create needed workforce housing and preserve a historic building.

Allegrone has said the sources of funding are required to make this happen.

The project is also supported by $175,000 in the city's Community Preservation Act funds.


Tags: housing,   state grant,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories