Residents Debate Chicken Coop Permit at Adams ZBA

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Several neighbors of the applicants attended the meeting, voicing concerns over rodents, waste and other issues.

ADAMS, Mass. — A local man's request to have chickens at his Second Street home is ruffling his neighbor's feathers. 

Nearly a dozen people attended Tuesday's Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to debate a special permit for a chicken coop, causing the board to table the issue until its next meeting.

The applicants, Zachary Poplaski and Ingrid Olsen of 19 Second St., began raising chickens in a coop on their property several months ago.

When the two put up the coop, they did not know that a special permit was necessary after reading the Adams bylaws.

"We've always been passionate about agriculture and farming. We bought this house with intentions of using our new land, which is small, but capable, to grow our own food and to provide for our family," Olsen said. "We'd like to make it very clear that we were just trying to do that and that only in getting the chickens. We meant no harm to the town of Adams or our neighbors."

After nearly an hour of public comment, the board voted to continue the issue until the next meeting. Board member Nathaniel Karns suggested holding the public hearing open until the board can get more information on the property and specific neighbor concerns.

"I am concerned that we do not have a plot plan that shows the dimensions of the property, the location of the various buildings," he said, noting that the property does not meet the 5-acre property size requirements for Right to Farm. "I find that difficult for us to deal with."

Second Street is located off East Street, fairly close to the downtown area.

Two residents, John and Laura Belleau, provided the board with an aerial view of the chicken coop in relation to their property line. John Belleau said he was worried about how the coop would affect their property value.

Laura Belleau said she is not angry or against chickens but is worried about rodents and had questions about the composting process.

"We're very close together," she said. "I have some public health and safety concerns. What does the town of Adams have in place for rodent control?"

Resident John Lawson said he spoke with a chicken expert, whom he did not wish to name publicly, and had concerns about potential safety issues and the lack of advanced notice of the coop.

"I was concerned because I woke up one morning, three months ago, and there's a chicken coop five feet from my fence," he said.



Lawson also raised concerns about the coop attracting bears in the neighborhood. Poplaski said bears were present in the neighborhood even before putting up the coop.

Resident Jackie Thompson, said she has no problem with chickens and was not sure why other residents are upset about issues such as bears and rodents, which she said are separate issues.

"Bears are not after chickens. They're not carnivores," she said. "They're probably getting your garbage whether you got a bungee cord or a chain on it, because I've seen it."  

The board will discuss the issue at its next meeting on Aug. 9.

In other business, the board continued an application for a special permit for a dance studio at 8 East Hoosac St. The applicant was unable to attend the meeting.

The board approved an application for a special permit for a garage at 26 East Orchard Terrace.


Tags: chickens,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Special Minerals Agrees to Pay Adams, River Groups Over River Discharge

Staff ReportsiBerkshires

Adams plans to use the $50,000 it will get in the consent decree toward the removal of the Peck's Road Dam. 
BOSTON — Specialty Minerals is expected to pay $299,000 for a discharge of calcium carbonate into the Hoosic River nearly three years ago in a consent decree with the Attorney General's Office. 
 
The river turned visibly white from Adams to the Vermont state line from the mineral that leaked out from the plant's settling ponds on Howland Avenue in November 2021. 
 
Calcium carbonate, also known as chalk or limestone, is not toxic to humans or animals. However, the sudden discoloration of the water alarmed local officials and environmentalists and prompted an emergency session of the Northern Berkshire Regional Emergency Planning Committee. 
 
"We allege that this company violated its permits, disregarded federal and state law, and put the Hoosic River — a resource cherished by the Adams community — at risk," said AG Andrea Campbell in a statement. "I am grateful for this collaboration with our state agency partners and committed to holding polluters accountable and working to bring resources back to communities disproportionately impacted by environmental harms."   
 
If approved by the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, the consent decree will require Specialty Minerals to pay a total of $299,000, which includes payments to the town of Adams and three community groups in Northern Berkshire County that will be used to benefit water quality and prevent stormwater impacts. 
 
Once approved, most of the settlement would fund multiple projects to benefit water quality, including infrastructure improvements and native plantings to mitigate stormwater impacts in the Hoosic River Watershed. Specifically, the proposed settlement provides for: 
  • $50,000 to the town of Adams for infrastructure improvements in a tributary of the Hoosic River
  • $50,000 to Hoosic River Revival for stormwater mitigation projects  
  • $50,000 to Hoosic River Watershed Association for a native plant garden and other projects to mitigate stormwater impacts and benefit water quality 
  • $50,000 to Sonrisas to fund invasive plant removal and native plant habitat establishment at Finca Luna Búho, a community land project that centers the voices and prioritizes the decision-making of those living in marginalization. 
It will also provide $30,000 in civil assessments to the state's Natural Heritage Endangered Species Fund and $20,000 in civil penalties for violation of state law, as well as $49,000 to offset the costs of the AG's enforcement efforts. 
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories