image description
The three options for the Brayton/Greylock school project were presented on Thursday.
image description
The footprint of a new Greylock is seen in blue.
image description
The new school would take advantage of passive solar large southern-facing windows.
image description
This schematic shows the addition of about 20,000 square feet to the current Greylock.
image description
The pitch of the Greylock addition would mimic the mountain behind it.
image description
image description
Brayton would be slightly shortened and a play area added near the cafeteria.
image description
The exterior of Brayton would not change significantly.
image description
The third floor would be opened up to allow light to flow to the second floor.

North Adams Presents School Project Options to Public

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — There were few questions and little discussion from the community at Thursday's public information session on the options for Brayton/Greylock School project. 
 
Julia McFadden and Jesse Saylor of TSKP Studio, the project designers, went over the history and elements of the options to a handful of people at the Brayton School Welcome Center; another 10 were logged through Zoom. 
 
A meeting was held earlier in the day for faculty and staff. 
 
The School Building Committee has met twice this month to review in more detail the three options still on the table — a Greylock renovation/addition, a completely new Greylock or a Brayton renovation. 
 
The committee checked off elements including learning commons and STEAM spaces, flexible classrooms, internal connectivity, community use, traffic patterns and transportation, sustainability, locations and topography, natural light, professional work and timeout areas, security, and access to the outdoors and playgrounds.
 
All three are considered favorable in terms of design for education visioning goals such as student-centered learning, robust technology, parent engagement and social emotional learning and support. 
 
But a new Greylock was the most favorable across the board while the Brayton renovation had the most least favorable or neutral rankings. 
 
A renovated Greylock would have an airy 20,000 square-foot addition on the north side with large windows, a lobby and elevator. The roof line would be gabled to mimic Mount Greylock behind it and the courtyard would central to the design.
The entire building would be renovated.
 
A new Greylock would be built in the current parking area, allowing learning to continue while the building is constructed. This building would face the south for more light and the field and parking would be where the current school is located. The community areas — gym, auditorium, cafeteria — would be centralized on the west side with the playground.
 
The Brayton renovation would widen the entry drive and reconfigure the traffic circle to reduce obstructions and enhance pedestrian safety. The third floor would be opened up for a light well to the second floor and some excavation would be done around the lower classrooms for light. A small play area would be installed near the cafeteria and building would be shortened, though the exterior would not change much.
 
Greylock, at 55,000 square feet, would have to have another 20,000 square feet added based on enrollment figures; Brayton at 97,000, is too big so would have to be reduced. The enrollment figures are based on the new grade span of a prekindergarten to Grade 2 school and a Grade 3 to 6 school.  
 
Two of the questions related to traffic and where the students would go during a construction. Saylor explained how the parking and traffic patterns would work for either Greylock, which would allow for two curb cuts for entry and exit and ways to separate buses and vehicles. The topography for Brayton would not allow for two separate egresses, but the driveway up the hill would be widened to three lanes to relieve bottlenecks and the traffic pattern reconfigured to try to keep buses and pedestrians safe. 
 
Superintendent Barbara Malkas said the housing students during construction would depend on which option was selected. For either addition or renovation, the students would attend the school not under construction.
 
"We can think about how we can condense the student population because our enrollment would allow for that," she said. "That would speed up construction time and reduce costs."
 
A new Greylock School would solve these issues since the children could stay in place while the new school is being built across the way. 
 
The entire presentation will be posted to the North Adams Public Schools website. 
 
The School Building Committee is working toward an Oct. 26 submission to the Massachusetts School Building Authority. It is expected to review cost estimates on Oct. 12 and vote on a preferred option and then will meet with the School Committee for a submission vote on Oct. 17. 
 
Rough estimates given in April put the cost range at a low of $25 million for a Brayton renovation to a high of $90 million for a new Greylock. The MSBA will cover up to 80 percent of eligible costs. 
 
Should the MSBA's Facilities Assessment Subcommittee approve the preferred option, the project will move into Module Four for schematic design beginning in November. This is scheduled to take 18 weeks. 
 
Any project would still need funding approval from the City Council and final approval from the MSBA Board of Directors. 
 
Barring any obstacles, the new school would open in fall 2027. 

Tags: brayton/greylock project,   school project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

How is your retirement income taxed?

Once you're retired, you will likely need to draw on several types of income for your living expenses. You'll need to know where these funds are coming from and how much you can count on, but you should also be aware of how this money is taxed — because this knowledge can help you plan and budget for your retirement years.  

Here's the basic tax information on some key sources of retirement income:

  • Social Security – Many people don't realize they may have to pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. Whether your benefits will be taxed depends on how much other taxable income you receive from various sources, such as self-employment, stock dividends and interest payments. You'll want to check with your tax advisor to determine whether your income reaches the threshold where your Social Security benefits will be taxed. The lower your total taxable income, the lower the taxes will be on your benefits. The Social Security Administration will not automatically take out taxes from your monthly checks — to have taxes withheld, you will need to fill out Form W-4V (Voluntary Withholding Request). Again, your tax advisor can help you determine the percentage of your benefits you should withhold. 
  • Retirement accounts – During your working years, you may have contributed to two basic retirement accounts: an IRA and a 401(k) or similar plan (such as a 457(b) plan for state and local government employees or a 403(b) plan for educators and employees of some nonprofits). If you invested in a “traditional” IRA or 401(k) or similar plan, your contributions may have been partially or completely deductible and your earnings grew on a tax-deferred basis. But when you start taking withdrawals from your traditional IRA or 401(k), the money is considered taxable at your normal income tax rate. However, if you chose the "Roth" option (when available), your contributions were not deductible, but your earnings and withdrawals are tax-free, provided you meet certain conditions. 
  • Annuities – Many investors use annuities to supplement their retirement income. An annuity is essentially a contract between you and an insurance company in which the insurer pays you an income stream for a given number of years, or for life, in exchange for the premiums you paid. You typically purchase a “qualified” annuity with pre-tax dollars, possibly within a traditional IRA or 401(k), so your premiums may be deductible, and your earnings can grow tax deferred. Once you start taking payouts, the entire amount — your contributions and earnings — are taxable at your individual tax rate. On the other hand, you purchase “non-qualified” annuities with after-tax dollars, so your premiums aren't deductible, but just like qualified annuities, your earnings grow on a tax-deferred basis. When you take payments, you won't pay taxes on the principal amounts you invested but the earnings will be taxed as ordinary income. 

We've looked at some general rules governing different sources of income, but you should consult your tax professional about your specific situation. Ultimately, factors such as your goals, lifestyle and time horizon should drive the decisions you make for your retirement income. Nonetheless, you may want to look for ways to control the taxes that result from your various income pools. And the more you know about how your income is taxed, the fewer unpleasant surprises you may experience. 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories