The Hidden Toll: When Poverty Undermines Mental Health

By Deborah LeonczykGuest Column
Print Story | Email Story
 
When we talk about mental health, we often think of therapy, medication, or access to counselors. But just as important, especially in communities like ours, are the everyday stressors that slowly chip away at a person's ability to cope: constant worry over heating bills, empty cupboards, children without winter clothing, and the shame of having to ask for help again.
 
These challenges create more than financial strain, they take a serious toll on emotional well-being.
 
For thousands of Berkshire County residents, programs like the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) provide a fragile line of defense against these pressures. Their proposed elimination in the federal budget would remove critical supports, not just from household budgets, but from the emotional stability of families, seniors, and individuals already stretched to the edge.
 
Mental health is not shaped in a vacuum. It is built, or broken, by our environment. When basic needs go unmet, emotional health unravels. That unraveling is one of the most damaging and least visible consequences of poverty.
 
BCAC serves thousands of Berkshire County residents each year. While we do not provide clinical mental health services, we see every day how anxiety, depression, and despair creep in when people are overwhelmed by economic insecurity. When a parent cannot afford to heat their home or buy their child a pair of winter boots, it does not just create physical discomfort, it creates guilt, shame, and a sense of failure.
 
We hear it in the voices of those who call us: the senior quietly admitting they have been living in a cold home, the single mother crying in frustration over a shutoff notice, the middle-aged man, recently laid off, unable to afford groceries and too embarrassed to ask for help. These are not isolated cases. These are daily realities.
 
When CSBG and LIHEAP are in place, we can offer more than a temporary fix, we can offer hope. A warm home in January. A coat that fits. A volunteer who helps someone file their taxes and walks them through the refund they did not know they qualified for. These small things restore dignity and peace of mind. They help buffer the emotional cost of poverty.
 
The CDC's Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) research has shown that chronic stress during childhood, such as housing instability, hunger, or a lack of basic resources, can lead to long-term mental and physical health issues, including depression, anxiety, substance use, and heart disease. When children grow up in homes constantly in crisis, the effects follow them into adulthood. Eliminating programs that prevent or interrupt that cycle puts an entire generation at risk.
 
Now imagine that safety net disappearing.
 
Without LIHEAP, more than 8,000 Berkshire households could lose help with winter heating. Imagine the stress of facing subzero temperatures with no heat and no options. For older adults, that stress is not only dangerous, it is deeply isolating. Prolonged cold and social isolation are linked to depression, cognitive decline, and worsened health.
 
Without CSBG, there will be no funding to respond to the everyday emergencies that quietly destabilize lives, like a missed rent payment or the lack of transportation to get to work. Programs that provide warm clothing to approximately 2,300 children would disappear. Our ability to offer low-income lending programs that help people purchase a car to get to a job, or basic furniture when moving from a shelter into permanent housing, would be lost. The VITA program, which helps low-income families access the tax credits they have earned, would be left unfunded. 
 
These are not luxuries. They are the front line of crisis prevention.
 
As these supports vanish, the psychological effects ripple outward: rising anxiety in households already on edge, depression among those falling behind, and more children experiencing chronic stress in unstable homes. This is how the emotional cost of poverty shows up, quietly, cumulatively, and powerfully.
 
This is how mental health degrades in a community. Not all at once, but one lost resource at a time.
 
And what happens when emotional distress deepens and there is nowhere to turn? For too many, it ends in the emergency room, or in harmful coping strategies. For others, it festers silently, doing long-term harm to children, parents, and elders alike.
 
We cannot afford to ignore the emotional cost of poverty. Experts agree that social determinants, such as safe housing, adequate heat, food security, and economic stability, are directly tied to emotional well-being. If these are taken away, no amount of therapy can fill the void.
 
Here in the Berkshires, CSBG brings in over $400,000 annually. It is not a large sum in government terms, but its impact is profound. It allows us to act swiftly when someone is in crisis, to prevent their stress from becoming trauma, and to protect our neighbors from slipping through the cracks.
 
I urge our community to speak out before this safety net is torn away. Call or write your federal representatives, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Ed Markey, and Congressman Richard Neal.
 
Tell them what these programs mean to you, your family, or someone you care about. Remind them that behind every statistic is a person carrying more than just financial burdens, they are carrying emotional ones, too.
 
Because mental health matters, and with the right supports in place, our children and families can live with dignity, find stability, and build stronger, healthier futures for generations to come.
 
Deborah Leonczyk is executive director Berkshire Community Action Council.

Tags: BCAC,   LIHEAP,   mental health,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to the Future of Zoning Bylaws

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board is reviewing the town's zoning bylaws with an eye to amending zones to align with planning documents and projects. 

Members started at last week's meeting to at priority zoning projects that align with the Open Space and Recreation Plan and the Master Plan that was adopted last year. Earlier in the meeting, the board accepted the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission's draft of the OSRP, which the Select Board accepted late last month.

Town planner Andrew Groff informed the board of upcoming projects that will need to be looked at for zoning purposes to try and stay ahead of the bylaws that aligned in both the OSRP and Master Plan.

"Principally, would be going back and thinking about this idea of a mixed-use zoning district for the northern part of town that's responsive to the growth of outdoor recreation as it is really an industry. So you've got Shaker Ridge, you've got the folks at Donnybrook that proposes a glamping resort, Ramble Wild, and Brodie Mountain just over the town line in New Ashford with some new ownership and expanded interest in some development there, so that's one item that's called for in both."

Groff also explained they need to look into agriculture zones to help local farmers 

"Seeing if we can't do something to better support our farms because we have a couple great little farm clusters in Lanesborough. You know, zoning for agriculture is pretty expansive in Massachusetts. The exemption for agriculture is pretty wise, but we want to take a closer look and talk to some of our farmers and figure out there's some tweaks we can do that would make their lives easier."

He also brought up how they can help fix the zoning bylaws around the lake that are nonconforming and want to look into grant funding to help.

"Work that's going to be done to further protect Pontoosuc Lake, and we have a lot in our master plan regarding the zoning issues on Pontoosuc from the issue that you had mentioned to me, bringing back the citizens who were concerned about building heights down there, but you know, more fundamentally identified in the master plan is the problems with how everything is basically nonconforming. The zoning doesn't conform to what the actual built environment is. That's something we probably want to look into talking with folks in the community planning office," he said.

Groff mentioned there is a ballot question that, if it passes, would mean changing zoning regarding public water and sewer, and affect properties near the lake. 

"There is going to be on the ballot in November a question that will essentially require any community in Massachusetts that has built an environment that's on public water/sewer, you're going to have to reduce your lot sizes to 5,000 square feet. So I feel like if that passes, that has massive implications for that part of town. So, just another one to put out there, but maybe we want to wait to really tackle that with some grant funding once we know what the Legislature's done."

Chair Leanne Yinger said she lives in that area and it already seems very congested, meaning that the passage of the ballot question could have big implications.

She also mentioned another implication for the health of the lake she would like to see happen.

"I would like to see us ban pesticides and people treating their lawns," she said. "Part of the problem of the health of the lake is that when I say that out loud, and I'm saying it out loud to anybody who will listen to me, it is not a popular thing to say. But it is killing the lake."

Yinger said she would like to clarify who governs the sewer system around Pontoosuc Lake, noting the new owner of a friend's house needed to purchase access to the sewer from a private party. Groff said he couldn't remember if it is water district or town, but that there is something "funky" about the governance over there.

"I need to understand what that looks like, because the way it came down was interesting. The line comes in from Pittsfield, but there are people claiming that they have rights to it because they bought into it originally. I just want to understand what that's like and who's saying you're in charge with it, because it seems to me that that's a town-managed situation," Yinger said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories