Adams Board Deems Three Dogs Dangerous

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
ADAMS, Mass. — The Select Board on Wednesday declared three dogs "dangerous" and to be restrained after a May dog attack that resulted in the death of Kasey, a 22-year-old Chihuahua mix.
 
The board heard from officials and from the related neighbors whose dogs were involved.
 
Richard Thayer, of East Hoosac Street, provided testimony of the May 10 altercation, with his partner, Cheryl Woodard, occasionally interjecting for clarification. Their dog Kasey was attacked by three dogs owned by his next-door neighbor and Cheryl's brother Ronnie Woodard and his partner, Caroline Kennedy.
 
Despite the "traumatizing" nature of the attack, which has led to him needing behavioral health service, Thayer advocated for an alternative remedial action rather than having the animals removed from the home.
 
Thayer filed the complaint against Xena, Dozer, and Priscilla, which are Rottweilers and Rottweilers mixes. 
 
During testimony from the involved parties, several key details remained unclear, including which dog first bit Kasey and which animal was the aggressor.
 
Thayer had reported that Kasey was killed by Dozer, a German shepherd-Rottweiler. Before the attack, he said Kasey was unleashed outside and getting along with two dogs he believed to be Xena and Bull, Xena and Dozer's puppy.
 
However, later he acknowledged that Xena, an American Rottweiler, and Dozer look very similar and that he could have confused the dogs' names.
 
Thayer claimed that Woodard and Kennedy's third dog, Dozer, or Xena "came crashing through" the screen door and attacked Kasey. 
 
Despite efforts by Thayer and Woodard to separate them, the situation escalated, with the two other dogs joining in the attack — and "finished Kasey off" while she was on the ground.
 
Kennedy claimed that Dozer would never go after Kasey and that Xena was the dog that burst out of the house as a protective act over her puppy, Bull. She repeatedly described Xena as highly protective with a history of being reactive around certain people and of guarding her household and puppy.
 
Her belief that Xena's behavior was not out of aggression but was protective over Bull, was indicated in Animal Control Officer Kimberly Witek's report from May 11.
 
Police Chief Timothy Sorrell read Witek's report during the board meeting, which outlined how she visited Kennedy and Woodard's home to see their four dogs. 
 
During the visit, the couple's three adult dogs Dozer, Xena, and Priscilla jumped on her without showing aggression. 
 
However, when Kennedy brought out the 5-month-old puppy, Bull, Xena tried to bite Witek's hand as she reached for the puppy, which she interpreted as protective behavior rather than outright aggression. 
 
The board deemed Xena, Dozer, and Priscilla as dangerous dogs and ordered that the owners have the dogs tethered while outdoors in an open space, be confined to a locked pen that's secure or muzzled when not in the pen. 
 
Additionally the board required that the dogs continue to be licensed and vaccinated and required the animals be spayed and neutered within the next six months. 

Tags: dangerous dog,   dogs,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Planning Board Cited for Open Meeting Law Violation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
ADAMS, Mass. — The state Attorney General's Office has determined that the Planning Board violated Open Meeting Law by continuing to deliberate on a matter after adjournment.
 
According to the determination, the violation occurred after adjourning the Jan. 27, 2025, meeting when three board members stayed to discuss permitting concerns for Aisling Mountain Farm, a 22-acre equestrian facility on West Road owned by Kathryn Foley.
 
The board was ordered to amend its meeting minutes within the next 30 days, to include a summary of the discussion that occurred after the meeting was adjourned, to certify to to the AG's Office that it has done so, and to comply with the Open Meeting Law going forward.
 
The ruling stems from a complaint filed by Catherine Foster on Aug. 22, 2025, alleging that the board violated the Open Meeting Law during and after its Jan. 27 meeting.
 
Although filed nearly seven months after the January meeting, the Attorney General's Office said it met the 30-day filing deadline because Foster did not become aware of the situation until it was raised at a July 23 Select Board meeting.
 
"The Open Meeting Law requires that complaints be filed within 30 days of the alleged violation, or if the alleged violation could not reasonably have been known at the time it occurred, then within 30 days of the date it should reasonably have been discovered," Assistant Attorney General Matthew Lindberg said in the determination.
 
"The complainant could not reasonably have discovered that the Board deliberated after adjournment of the January 27 meeting until the issue was raised during public comment at the July 23 Select Board meeting. Because the complaint was filed within 30 days of the July 23 Select Board meeting, the complaint was filed timely as to this allegation"
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories