Home About Archives RSS Feed

@theMarket: Sticky Inflation Slows Market Advance

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires columnist
February inflation data showed no progress on inflation. That follows the same kind of readings from the previous month. While two months does not make a trend, the disappointing numbers gave investors pause.
 
Both the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and its cousin, The Producer Price Index (PPI), came in warmer than economists had expected. Consumer prices rose 3.2 percent in February from a year earlier but were only slightly higher than economists' expectations of 3.1 percent. The PPI rose 1.6 percent year-over-year, which was the largest gain since last September. Month-over-month, the PPI at +0.6 percent was double the average forecast.
 
These data points should be taken with a grain of salt since a couple of higher numbers should be expected. Few, if any, macroeconomic trends travel in an uninterrupted straight line higher or lower.  Unfortunately, these results practically guarantee that the Federal Reserve will hold off on any plans to cut interest rates.
 
No one was expecting the Fed to cut in March anyway. In Chairman Powell's most recent statements, he indicated March was off the table. But now, the earliest the market can expect a cut will be in June, if then. Markets are now pricing in about a 59 percent chance of an interest rate cut in June. Given that economic growth and employment trends remain strong, some argue that the Fed need not reduce interest rates at all this year.
 
Any hint of no cuts ahead would not be taken kindly by the markets. That is because much of the gains in financial markets, whether in bonds, equities, precious metals, commodities, crypto, etc., have been fueled by investors' expectations that the Fed is planning on reducing interest rates at least three times this year.
 
As such, the FOMC meeting notes will be released on the afternoon of March 20, and I suspect every word will be analyzed with a microscope. Chairman Powell's Q&A session afterward will also be subject to the same scrutiny. I don't expect that Powell will deliver a nasty downside surprise. After all, this is an election year, and while the Fed is supposed to be "non-political," I doubt they would want to upset the economic apple cart and influence one side or the other.
 
As readers are aware, I believe the stock market is in the ninth inning of this rally. This week, the high on the S&P 500 Index was less than 44 points away from my top-of-the-range 5,220 target. I've noticed some changes in the market behavior while we made that new high. The momentum that has been driving stocks since the beginning of the year is beginning to wane and, in some areas, even reverse. The action of late has been wild and there are some signs of short-term topping patterns.
 
The technology sector, for example, which has led the market all year, is beginning to struggle. Semiconductors have been choppy. Nvidia, the quintessential AI stock, is no longer going up 2-3 percent per day. It is now down about 100 points from its all-time high. Some stalwarts of the market like Apple, Google, and Tesla (to varying degrees) seem to be rolling over. Some say that where Apple goes, so goes the market. 
 
In this risk-on environment, the declining dollar has been supporting commodities, especially gold and silver. However, the greenback, which is the world's safest trade, has flattened out and may be starting to bounce as traders worry that lower inflation is not quite in the bag. All of this tells me to be cautious and while we could still climb higher, I would have one eye on the exit.
 
Readers, please be aware that due to two upcoming medical procedures, there will be no columns next week, and again none during the week of April 1.
 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.

 

     

The Retired Investor: Eating Out Not What It Used to Be

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires columnist
Many Americans are getting a bad case of sticker shock when their check arrives at their favorite restaurants. Higher costs for labor, food, and a variety of other inputs are conspiring to make dining out a luxury item that fewer can afford.
 
Lest you think that these sky-high prices are confined to the white tablecloth crowd, guess again. I'm talking about everywhere. Prices in fast food chains, your neighborhood bar and grill, the home-style diner on the corner, and even your local Chinese takeout joint are jacking up prices.
 
By the beginning of this year, the costs of eating out rose more than 30 percent since 2019, according to the Labor Department. I think that is low. My favorite burger chain has increased prices so much that today the average burger costs more than $16 (with fries and a soda, we are talking more than $20).
 
In many cases, restaurants have no choice. Wages for everyone from waiters to busboys, cooks, and dish washers are going up along with the minimum wage. This year, the minimum wage was raised again in 22 states. In addition, restaurants in some areas have been forced to offer or expand fringe benefits to keep staff from quitting.
 
And yet, the restaurant business overall is expected to break $1.1 trillion in 2024, which is a 5 percent jump from 2023 and a new sales record. Employment in the sector is now back to its pre-pandemic level as well. The clear winners of this surge have been the fast-food and takeaway chains.
 
The independent restaurants, especially those with full-service operations, have not fared nearly as well. Caught between escalating costs and increasing resistance by diners to higher check prices, the independents are caught between a rock and a hard place with nowhere to go.
 
As if prices aren't high enough, a new technology-fueled wrinkle will soon be introduced to a restaurant or two near you. It is called "dynamic pricing." Thanks to software innovations, restaurants can move prices up and down based on demand and staffing. This will allow companies to change prices weekly or monthly depending on what they perceive are periods of surging demand.
 
It is a concept that most of us have had some experience with in the past. We all know that airfares increase during the holidays. A summer rental on the beach is more expensive in July than in November. Hotels charge more on the weekends and taxis more at rush hour. Eating and drinking establishments have long used the concept to draw in customers, for example, featuring "happy hours" or "early bird specials" where drinks and/or food are cheaper. However, now companies are using the reverse and charging higher prices during periods when demand surges.
 
Earlier this month, Wendy's CEO Kirk Tanner mentioned that the burger chain was testing dynamic pricing using algorithms, machine learning, and AI. The comment hit the national news wires and the backlash from fast-food fans was fast and furious. The furor resulted in a company statement denying it was going to raise prices, but instead use digital menus to change offerings during the day and offer discounts at slower times.
 
However, dozens of restaurants have already implemented surge pricing, according to the New York Post. And more will certainly be trying out the concept. By some estimates, restaurant chains could easily see prices during the lunch rush, for example, increase by 10-20 percent. The key is in how it is implemented. Focusing on the times of day when prices are lower seems crucial, rather than when they are higher. Somehow that is considered more palatable to consumers. Good luck with that. 
 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.

 

     

@theMarket: Markets March to New Highs (Again)

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires columnist
At this point, a day without a new high seems almost abnormal. AI stocks rage higher, joined by weight loss companies like Lilly. The good news keeps rolling in with even Chairman Jerome Powell of the Federal Reserve Bank seemingly more dovish. 
 
The Fed chairman testified before both the House and Senate this week. He indicated that we could expect a couple of interest rate cuts this year if the inflation data continues to weaken. He also said that if it does, the Fed won't wait until inflation hits its 2 percent target before loosening monetary policy.
 
The economy continues to grow, and while there is some evidence that labor growth is moderating in certain sectors, the latest non-farm payroll numbers for February — a gain of 275,000 jobs — were higher than expected. However, the headline unemployment rate hit 3.9 percent from 3.7 percent in January.
 
Bottom line: there are still plentiful jobs available for anyone who wants one. Wage growth, however, is slowing (0.1 percent versus 0.2 percent month over month). That is helping to rein in inflation. The macroeconomic data is helping to boost the good cheer within the financial markets.
 
Even the problems that have beset a large regional bank, New York Community Bank (NYCB), did nothing to dent the armor of the bulls. This regional bank merged with a troubled Michigan mortgage lender, Flagstar Bank, in a $2.6 billion deal last year during the regional bank crisis. The merger pushed the combined bank near a $100 billion regulator threshold, which imposes stiff capital rules on banks over that level.
 
The consensus on Wall Street is that NYCB's increased exposure to the commercial real estate market, plus the new requirements, forced the bank to slash its dividend in January. That sent NYCBs' stock diving, which in turn sparked credit downgrades.
 
This week, as the bank's stock price was in free fall, several investment firms, including Steven Mnuchin's Liberty Strategic Capital, Hudson Bay Capital, and Reverence Capital Partners injected more than $1 billion into the bank in exchange for equity. 
 
A year ago, a related issue (remember Silicon Valley Bank) drove down equity markets. At the time, investors feared that financial contagion might overwhelm the overall banking sector. It didn't. This time around, markets barely blinked.
 
The widening of the breath of the stock markets has also increased investors’ confidence in the rally. Bond yields have fallen, and the U.S. dollar along with it. That has sparked a bull run in gold and in Bitcoin since both are considered currency equivalents.
 
But there is a little more to this story than that. Some economists and stock strategists argue that when the Fed begins to cut interest rates, the dollar is going to tumble, and the demand for alternative currencies like gold and crypto will spike higher. Throw in the fear that the country's out-of-control debt level is going to cause a crisis, and you have the makings for much higher prices. As a result, both Bitcoin and gold hit all-time highs this week.
 
As I wrote last week, we have met my first target on the S&P 500 Index of 5,140. My second higher target was 5,220-5,240. We are already halfway there as of Friday. The precious metals are over-extended and need a pullback as is the rest of the market. My advice: hold on, but not chase.
 
We continue to have at least one day a week where markets suddenly dive by more than 1-2 percent on no news.  Each time, (so far) markets rally back by the next day. Don't be lulled into believing that the dip and bounce strategy will continue to work. Somewhere up ahead there awaits a 7-10 percent correction. It could take until April before that occurs.
 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.

 

     

The Retired Investor: Companies Dropping Degree Requirements

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires columnist
In today's tight job market, many companies are dropping the required college degree
 
Time was that if you wanted to get ahead, find a higher-paying job, and establish financial security go to college. While some of that advice continues to hold, many companies are foregoing the sheepskin in exchange for experience, skills, and competencies workers have developed in the school of hard knocks.
 
In some respects, the hurtle of a college degree makes no sense when interviewing for a job that does not require college-level skills. I know of dozens of liberal arts majors who ended up working at fast food chains or landscaping.
 
But don't take my word for it. A labor analytics firm, Burning Glass Institute, and the Strada Education Foundations, a non-profit organization, studied the career path of 10 million people who entered the job market between 2012 and 2021. They found that roughly 52 percent of college grads were not using their skills and credentials in their jobs.
 
What a person studies in college, followed by the chance to intern were the main determinants of obtaining a college-level career track, according to the study. Given the escalating costs of higher education, along with years of student-debt payments, is it any wonder that the debate over the value of higher education is a hot topic today.
 
Last year, thanks to a tight labor market, companies began to get wise to the fact that a college degree was not necessary in many areas of employment. ZipRecruiter said the share of jobs that listed a bachelor's degree as a "must" fell from 18 percent in 2022 to 14.5 percent in 2023.
 
In a recent survey by the same recruiting firm, 45 percent of employers surveyed said they had dropped the degree requirement for certain roles, while 72 percent said they valued a candidate's skills and experience higher than the diploma they hold.  
 
Even among postings in "college-level occupations" only 78.4 percent of companies insisted on a degree. That is down from 85 percent 25 years ago, according to labor analytics firm Lightcast. In jobs such as insurance sales agents, e-commerce analysts, property appraisers, and call center managers a degree is now seldom required. Other areas where a college degree may give way to skills-based hiring are in health care, financial services, and IT.
 
That’s good news for a large segment of American workers. Almost two-thirds of the U.S. population over 25 years of age do not have a college degree. And today, America, like many other countries, is facing a long-term labor shortage with no easy solutions. Baby Boomers are retiring. The U.S. birth rates are low and still dropping, and the present shift against immigration by both the public and policymakers has cut off a historic avenue of new labor supply.
 
Given that 62 percent of Americans do not have a college degree, some companies most notably IBM, Walmart, General Motors, and Medtronic are eliminating degree requirements in hundreds of their job postings. Others are following but old habits die hard. The value of a college degree is deeply embedded in the psyche of many a human resources department. Changing those attitudes take time as does discarding automated screening tools that automatically reject non-college applicants.
 
One of the most vocal critics of today's college education is billionaire Peter Thiel, an early Facebook investor and founder of PayPal Holdings and Palantir Technologies. A Stanford graduate with degrees in philosophy and law, he became disenchanted with how leading U.S. colleges were turning out graduates. Thiel became convinced that higher education is not in the best interests of most Americans.
 
Starting in 2010, Thiel established a non-profit foundation that offers to pay students $100,000 to drop out of school to start companies or nonprofits. He selects 20 students per year. Since then, Thiel's program has backed 271 people. Some of those selected have since established successful companies in venture capital as well as in the technology area.
 
In defense of the college degree, studies still show that recent college grads, aged 22-27 working full time, earned $24,000 more per year than those with only a high school degree. Presumably, these grads were lucky enough to find entry jobs in their chosen fields. 
 
David Deming, an economist at Harvard University, argues that wage premium for college grads doubles over the life cycle from age 25 to 60 versus high schoolers. More educated workers are also more likely to have paid health insurance, sick and family leave, as well as the ability to work remotely.
 
As for me, I have long believed that college is not for everyone. Sure, the hard sciences will always be in demand and college is good place to acquire that knowledge base. Beyond that, liberal arts in this country does not seem to be a robust career path if money and security are a topic of concern. I would much rather see a young man or woman give equal consideration to a vocational school after graduating from high school. 
 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.

 

     

@theMarket: Tech Takes Break as Other Sectors Play Catch-up

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires columnist
One of the main complaints of market watchers has been the narrow breadth of the stock market. Few areas, besides the handful of tech stocks, have participated in the bull market this year. That has changed.
 
Biotech, crypto, financials, industrials, and even the staid healthcare sector have come to life this week. The Russell 2000 small-cap index outperformed as well. In the meantime, the Mag 7 and AI 5 marked time.
 
As I warned readers last week, I thought stocks were due for a little consolidation as traders took profits on some of the large gains accrued over the last two months. The fact that large-cap tech sold off and the markets barely budged was meaningful to me. It is an indication that there was a lot of non-tech buying under the hood of the averages.
 
The value of any one of three of the Mag 7 stocks (Microsoft, Apple, or Nvidia) is equal to the entire market capitalization of the small-cap, Russel 2000 Index. If all three were sold down at the same time (even a little), there needs to be an awful lot of buying in other areas just to keep the major averages afloat. That is what happened.
 
This week's most important data point was the Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index (PCE), which is the Federal Reserve Bank's key inflation indicator. The PCE increased 0.3 percent month-over-month in January 2024. That was in line with market expectations. Prices for services went up 0.6 percent while goods decreased 0.2 percent. The monthly core PCE inflation, which excludes food and energy, edged up 0.4 percent.
 
All those data points came in as expected, and traders used that as an excuse to boost the market. However, nothing in the report would convince the Fed to cut interest rates in March at their next FOMC meeting on March 15-16, in my opinion. It may have been the smallest annual rise in inflation we've seen in three years, but it was still a rise. If anything, it justifies the Fed’s decision to wait until they see further headway on inflation before considering an interest rate cut.
 
The real star of the week was Bitcoin. The cryptocurrency breached $60,000 for the first time since November 2021 and came close to $64,000 before giving back some of its gains. Bitcoin is up more than 42 percent since the Securities and Exchange Commission approved spot exchange-traded funds back in January 2024.
 
With the move higher, Bitcoin has reclaimed its trillion-dollar status. But it has yet to top its all-time high made in November 2021. At that time, the coin surpassed $68,000 briefly as many panicky traders turned to the digital asset during the pandemic fears.
 
However, this week, it did hit an all-time high in 14 different countries with weaker currencies than the U.S. dollar. Some of the crypto bulls I follow predict we will break above the old high (after a pullback) and could see as high as $100,000 by the end of the year. I don't see why not.
 
We are at that stage in the markets where we could see an end to this bull run at any time. It could be today, two weeks from now, or ... The problem with that forecast is that everyone is saying the same thing. And what do the markets usually do in that situation — what is most inconvenient for the greatest number of people? In this case — up.
 
Last week we came close to my S&P 500 Index target of 5,140. Since then, we have traded down slightly, but momentum traders simply moved from buying tech to bidding up other sectors of the market. It is the financial equivalent of a game of moving chairs.
 
March is upon us, and it looks to me like we still have a little gas left in the tank. The charts say we can still go higher. Most technicians see this week's mild consolidation as no biggy. Yes, the markets are extended and overbought, but could get more so. Margin debt, which is a good indicator of speculation, stands at $702 billion as of the end of January. That is a lot of gambling money, but it is still lower than it was at the beginning of the two previous selloffs ($936 billion in October 2021, and $710 billion in July 2023). 
 
As I have written in the last few weeks we are no longer in the land of fundamentals. The markets are being driven by money flows. Momentum rules the day and as such, we could just as easily see 5,200 as we could see 4,800 on the S&P 500. I say enjoy the ride while it lasts and when we pull back buy the dip.
 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Anyone seeking individualized investment advice should contact a qualified investment adviser. None of the information presented in this article is intended to be and should not be construed as an endorsement of OPI, Inc. or a solicitation to become a client of OPI. The reader should not assume that any strategies or specific investments discussed are employed, bought, sold, or held by OPI. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct. Investments in securities are not insured, protected, or guaranteed and may result in loss of income and/or principal. This communication may include opinions and forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such beliefs and expectations will prove to be correct.

 

     
Page 1 of 223 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 ... 223  

Support Local News

We show up at hurricanes, budget meetings, high school games, accidents, fires and community events. We show up at celebrations and tragedies and everything in between. We show up so our readers can learn about pivotal events that affect their communities and their lives.

How important is local news to you? You can support independent, unbiased journalism and help iBerkshires grow for as a little as the cost of a cup of coffee a week.

News Headlines
Scoil Rince Bréifne Ó Ruairc Participated in North American Open Championships
Pittsfield Police Participating in US 20 Speed Enforcement Project
MassDOT Project Will Affect Traffic Near BMC
Dalton ADA Committee Explores Expanding
Milne Public Library Trustees Announce New Library Director
Clark Art Presents Free Thematic Tour on Music in Art
BCC, Mill Town Partner to Support Philanthropy Through 40 Under Forty
SVMC' Wellness Connection: March 15
Pittsfield Community Meeting On Rest of the River Project
Slavic Easter Egg Decorating At Ventfort Hall
 
 


Categories:
@theMarket (480)
Independent Investor (451)
Retired Investor (183)
Archives:
March 2024 (5)
March 2023 (4)
February 2024 (8)
January 2024 (8)
December 2023 (9)
November 2023 (5)
October 2023 (7)
September 2023 (8)
August 2023 (7)
July 2023 (7)
June 2023 (8)
May 2023 (8)
April 2023 (8)
Tags:
Stimulus Jobs Stock Market Fiscal Cliff Pullback Election Euro Europe Employment Economy Banks Commodities Debt Stocks Bailout Markets Oil Retirement Debt Ceiling Taxes Rally Banking Greece Interest Rates Selloff Japan Deficit Federal Reserve Congress Recession Energy Europe Crisis Metals Currency
Popular Entries:
The Independent Investor: Don't Fight the Fed
Independent Investor: Europe's Banking Crisis
@theMarket: Let the Good Times Roll
The Independent Investor: Japan — The Sun Is Beginning to Rise
Independent Investor: Enough Already!
@theMarket: Let Silver Be A Lesson
Independent Investor: What To Expect After a Waterfall Decline
@theMarket: One Down, One to Go
@theMarket: 707 Days
The Independent Investor: And Now For That Deficit
Recent Entries:
@theMarket: Sticky Inflation Slows Market Advance
The Retired Investor: Eating Out Not What It Used to Be
@theMarket: Markets March to New Highs (Again)
The Retired Investor: Companies Dropping Degree Requirements
@theMarket: Tech Takes Break as Other Sectors Play Catch-up
The Retired Investor: The Economics of Taylor Swift
@theMarket: Nvidia Leads Markets to Record Highs
The Retired Investor: The Chocolate Crisis, or Where Is Willie Wonka When You Need Him
The Retired Investor: Auto Insurance Premiums Keep Rising
@theMarket: Melt-up in Markets Fueled by Momentum