New Book on Supreme Court by Historian James MacGregor Burns

Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. - James MacGregor Burns, the Woodrow Wilson Professor of Government Emeritus at Williams College, is the author of a new book titled "Packing the Court: The Rise of Judicial Power and the Coming Crisis of the Supreme Court" (Penguin).

Burns, a distinguished scholar of presidential leadership and Pulitzer Prize winner, presents an illuminating critique of how an unaccountable and frequently partisan Supreme Court has come to wield more power than the founding fathers ever intended -- and may be headed for a historic confrontation over judicial power.

Much as we would like to believe that the Court remains aloof from ideological politics, Packing the Court reveals how often justices behave like politicians in robes.

As Burns reminds us, the Constitution does not grant the Supreme Court the power of judicial review -- that is, the ability to strike down laws passed by Congress and signed by the president. Yet throughout its history, as Packing the Court demonstrates, the Supreme Court has used this power to derail progressive reform.

The term "packing the court" is usually applied to FDR's failed attempt to expand the size of the Court after a conservative bench repeatedly overturned key New Deal legislation.


But Burns shows that presidents from Jefferson to Jackson, Lincoln to FDR, have clashed with powerful justices who refused to recognize the claims of popularly elected majorities.

The book, called by Publishers Weekly "fresh and compelling," reveals how these battles have threatened the nation's welfare in the most crucial moments of our history, from the Civil War to the Great Depression -- and may do so again.

More than eight years after Bush v. Gore, ideological justices have the tightest grip on the Court in recent memory.

Drawing on over two centuries of American history, Packing the Court offers a clear-eyed and provocative critique of judicial supremacy and concludes with a bold proposal to strip the Court of its power to frustrate democratic leadership.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Couples Faces 5 Years for 2020 Death of Foster Child

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Sentencing for the Adams couple found guilty in the 2020 death of their foster infant has been pushed off by two weeks.

The court wants to clarify care for their four children before possibly issuing prison sentences. 

Matthew Tucker and Cassandra Barlow-Tucker, on Monday, were found guilty of involuntary manslaughter and reckless child endangerment in the death of Kristoff Zenopolous on Feb. 18, 2020. 

Kristoff was just 10 months old when he died from complications with respiratory illness, strep, and pneumonia, and the jury determined that the tragedy was a result of neglect. 

On Thursday, Judge Tracy Duncan continued the hearing for sentence imposition to Thursday, April 2, at 11 a.m. She explained that the Berkshire Superior Court wants to know the plan for the family's four children, two of whom have high needs, before their parents are sentenced.  

The commonwealth is requesting five years in prison and three years of probation for both defendants.

Evidence presented at trial showed that the child died after the defendants failed to seek medical treatment despite clear and obvious signs that he required care. The medical examiner determined that the child died from complications of a strep infection, bronchopneumonia, and empyema, a condition in which pus accumulates in the lungs and chest wall. 

Attorneys representing the couple have asked for probation and for staggered prison sentences if they are incarcerated. 

The court heard from Kristoff's birth mother, Kayla Zenopoulos, who said her heart breaks every day, and his grandfather, who lovingly described the baby's favorite foods, toys, and songs before his life was tragically cut short. 

View Full Story

More North County Stories