Williamstown Approves New School Union

By Derek MongiBerkshires Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

WILLIAMSTOWN — Voting unanimously, and with only brief discussion, the Williamstown Elementary School Committee agreed to join a superintendency union with Lanesborough Elementary School, effective July 1, 2008. 

The vote, held at a special meeting Thursday evening, follows Lanesborough's 3-0 vote on Jan. 31 to dissolve School Union 69 with Richmond, New Ashford and Hancock.   

Such a union, as outlined last month by Williamstown School Committee Chairman David Backus, would primarily exist at the administrative level, with each school sharing the costs of a superintendent, superintendent's assistant, special education director and business coordinator. That would save the school district an estimated $110,000 in 2008.

The benefits to Lanesborough, however, stretch beyond the financial. With William Ballen, the current superintendent of Union 69, and Paul Mays, its special education director, both leaving, Lanesborough now avoids a protracted search for their replacements. Lanesborough will also receive committee representation commensurate with its costs, a virtue school officials found lacking in Union 69, in which they had 25 percent of the votes but incurred more than half the costs.

A number of Lanesborough parents have expressed hope at earlier hearings that the new union between the schools will promote closer connections between their students, who become classmates once they enter Mount Greylock Regional High and Middle School.

Rose Ellis, Williamstown's school superintendent, and Michael Singleton, its special education director, would assume responsibility for both schools. Both were in attendance, as were members from the Lanesborough School Committee.


Among them was John "Jack" Hickey, who noted before the meeting that "our teachers from Lanesborough are having trouble with our decision, [but] it's the primary responsibility of the School Committee to advocate for the children." Following the Jan. 31 vote to dissolve Union 69, Bernadette McMahon, head of the Lanesborough Education Association, walked out of the room. She was followed by the other teachers. 

In Williamstown, opposition to the union has focused on special education, and the availability of resources and manpower were the two schools to unite. In a meeting at the end of last month, many parents expressed concern that the proposed union was distracting the school from filling a long vacant occupational therapist position.    

Before the superintendency union goes into effect, a number of conditions must first be met:

The state Department of Education will need to give its approval;

  • Both Lanesborough and Williamstown school committees will need to agree on a new three-year salary contract with Ellis;
  • Ellis' current contract will need to be set aside, effective June 30;
  • both schools will need to establish bylaws outlining the administration of the union. 

Backus and Lanesborough School Committee member Sheila Herbert agreed to work together to achieve those conditions. 
Following the meeting, which last no more than 10 minutes, members of both school committees met informally with each other and the few members of the community who attended the meeting. Williamstown  board member Margaret McComish said the turnout might have been affected by a recent article in The Berkshire Eagle in which Backus was quoted as saying he'd be surprised if the union didn't pass.

McComish went on to express her enthusiasm for the new union: "I'm on the School Committee and am a parent. I think it's a great opportunity for the school and both towns."   


Tags: LES,   school union,   WES,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Planning Board Narrowing in on Subdivision Bylaw Changes

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Planning Board late last month discussed specific features of what it plans to pass as a new subdivision control bylaw this year.
 
The board long has discussed the complex set of regulations as being out of date and cumbersome to both potential developers and the board itself, which has needed to hear requests for waivers of outdated rules for the handful of residential subdivisions that have been proposed in town in recent years.
 
This spring, the town engaged consultants from Northampton's Dodson and Flinker Landscape Architecture and Planning to go through the existing bylaw, compare it to more contemporary regulations in other communities and help craft a revised bylaw.
 
Unlike the zoning bylaw, where amendments require approval of town meeting, the subdivision control bylaw is a creation of the Planning Board, which can make changes on its own after a public hearing process it hopes to complete this year.
 
At a special Planning Board meeting on May 26, Dillon Sussman of Dodson and Flinker and his colleagues walked the board through a dozen different decision points that the board must resolve — either by leaving the bylaw as is or making a change — and offered suggestions based on best practices.
 
All of the issues are technical and ranged from the fundamental, like how the bylaw will define types of subdivisions, to the highly specific, like what turning radii will be required in new streets that are constructed to serve planned developments.
 
One example of a topic that came up in the recent approval of a four-home subdivision off Summer Street is stormwater management.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories