image description

Pittsfield School Committee OKs $82M Budget, $1.5M Cuts

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school budget is less grim than the original proposal but still requires more than $1.5 million in cuts.

On Thursday, the School Committee approved an $82.8 million spending plan for fiscal year 2025, including a city appropriation of $80.4 million and $2.4 million in Chapter 70 funds.

The cuts made to balance the budget include about 50 staff reductions — some due to the sunsetting of federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds.

"The final version does not answer all needs. It will be unacceptable to some or to many but I must say that tonight's final proposal is very different than where we started when we believed we would have a $3,600,000 reduction. I want to assure everyone that every effort has been made to minimize the impact on both students, families, and staff members while also ensuring that our district has the necessary resources to progress forward," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"Nevertheless, there are incredibly passionate, dedicated staff members who will not be with us next year. This pains me as I've been a part of this organization for now 30 years so I want to assure everyone that our team, this has weighed very heavily in our hearts, this entire process. This is not a group of people that is looking at a spreadsheet saying ‘Well that can go and this can go’ and take that lightly."

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke and other officials worked with the state Department of Secondary and Elementary Education to rectify an error in the Chapter 70 funding formula, recognized 11 more low-income students in the district, and added an additional $2.4 million to the FY25 budget.

Curtis commented that when he first saw the governor’s FY25 budget, he was "rather stunned."

"The extraordinary circumstances we face this budget season by the conclusion of the substantial ESSER federal grant and a significant reduction in Chapter 70 allotment caused challenges for this team and our school principals and our educators and our staff that have been nothing short of all-consuming," he said.

"I want to extend my gratitude to everyone who has been involved, whether directly or indirectly, in developing this ever-changing and evolving proposal."

Mayor Peter Marchetti said this is not the ideal budget that he would have presented and revealed that the city budget will follow a similar path.

"A week or two from now we're going to present a city budget that also tells somewhat of a similar story with reductions made, not in the fact that reductions are made but we couldn't get to a level service funded budget," he said. "And so there's pain across the board."

Marchetti recalled conversations three years ago under the former administration when the ESSER funds were received.

"I think the message was clear three years ago, from my conversations with former mayor (Linda Tyer) that those positions are a three-year grant position and we shouldn't expect them to be part of the budget going forward," he added.



"Well, here we are, three years later and we all forget the conversation that this was a three-year grant-funded position, and let's not expect those to be permanent school budgets later and we see some of that today."

While nearly 50 positions will be cut, some 25 positions will be added. This includes the elimination of the deputy superintendent and curriculum director and the addition of: 

  • An assistant superintendent of curriculum, instruction, and educational engagement
  • An assistant superintendent of school transformation and accountability that will be half grant funded.

"The two positions I'm proposing, one will have a focus on our entire district and the other a laser-like focus on the six schools that have been identified currently for targeted assistance," Curtis explained.

Deputy Superintendent Marisa Mendonsa said Curtis' proposal will allow the focus and accountability needed for those schools to overcome the hurdle of underperformance.

"Our schools that are receiving that direct support from the state, they have unique things about them and they all have different needs and to have a point person who is really dedicated and focused on that, I think is a priority," she said.

"In terms of the second assistant superintendent, you need to have somebody really has that focus on curriculum instruction."

Members of the Pittsfield Educational Administrators Association, staff members, and parents of the school system spoke during open microphone against the staff cuts. More than 10 paraprofessional positions were reduced in the budget.

Twenty-five-year teacher Bridget McKeever said the proposed cuts could result in non-compliance with individualized education plans. She pointed to the high levels of moderately disabled students that Stearns Elementary School absorbed in kindergarten and first grade who need a sufficient amount of paras for assistance.

"Compliance with student's IEP state that they must be provided with a paraprofessional as they are written currently right now in each of the classes," she said.

"Our special education population and their needs have been ignored for far too long. They are in need of advocates to ensure compliance. Closing gaps in education is quite impossible when you continuously take away the support necessary to make that goal happen."

Curtis said this was not his understanding but he did not want to contradict a veteran employee and will do research to ensure that isn't the case. Stearns is staged for the reduction of four paras, two being vacant positions.

"It was a very difficult budget season. There were times I felt like 'Do I have a fever? I just don't feel really, really well,'" committee member Sara Hathaway said.

"It was just so hard and I felt for the people who have written to us and people who spoke this evening, people who have contacted us in other ways. I know what it's like to be non-renewed. It stinks and I feel bad for those people who are not going to be rejoining us in the new school year."


Tags: fiscal 2025,   pittsfield_budget,   school budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories