Pittsfield School Committee to Again Vote on PHS Report Release

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Committee will again discuss releasing a redacted version of the PHS report after confusion over a March vote. 

On Wednesday, member Ciara Batory, who has been vocal about releasing last year’s investigation into allegations of staff misconduct at Pittsfield High School, demanded a date for its release to the public.  It was indicated that the item can be put on the next meeting's agenda. 

"I am done playing the game. The public wants a date of when the redacted PHS report will be released, and I will not stop until I get a date," she said before a five-minute recess was called on the meeting. 

Last school year, five past and present PHS staff members were investigated for alleged misconduct, and allegations were found to be "unsupported," according to executive summaries released by the last term's committee. 

The School Committee agenda for its March 25 meeting included a "request by Ciara Batory to release the May 2025 Pittsfield High report with required redactions." It was reported that there were threats of legal action if the redacted report were released. 

Batory on Wednesday said she did not request that agenda item, and that the motion had already passed. Mayor Peter Marchetti, also chair, said they voted in January to review the redacted version, not to release it. 

Batory played the motion that passed in January from her phone: 

"I move the committee vote to release a PHS investigation report in a redacted form by February 18, 2026, and I'd like to add to that the School Committee reviews it before its release to the public, to make sure that there is enough to present to the public."

She repeatedly asked when the report would be released, at one point, queried colleagues about who read all of what they were provided, and who knew people named in the report. 

Sarah Muil, Heather McNeice, and Katherine Yon indicated that they read the summary, and McNeice and Yon indicated that they know one or more individuals in the report. Yon was a longtime teacher at PHS. 

Muil said she felt "very confused" because she thought they were voting to go into executive session to review the reports before deciding to release them. Batory said they did not go into executive session to review any report, but did so on their own, and Muil added they met with counsel and "reviewed a lot of things."

"And then we went into executive session again the night that we were going to take another vote, and then we didn't take the second vote," Muil said. 



Marchetti explained that it was placed back on the March agenda because the vote was not finished, and then no action was taken on it; Batory said it was an abuse of power.  

"The report was terrible. PHS was a free-for-all. None of the kids were listened to. It was disgusting to read, and I think that the public needs to read it so that it never happens again," she said. 

"The sweeping it under the rug culture is over. We voted yes. We did it respectfully with redactions. It's time to release it."

School Committee member Carolyn Barry hopes they can do this cohesively. 

"Personally, I would like to see the report released. I read the full thing. To me, there wasn't anything in there. There were no children's names. That's just my humble opinion," she said. 

"I would like to see all of us work together as a team. I know we have different points of view, but I think we can all learn from everybody else's points of view."

McNeice took the chair at one point in hopes of bringing down the temperature of the room, she said, and told Batory that "most people" will agree that that motion was confusing. After speaking to legal counsel, Marchetti said the report will be released when the School Committee takes an affirmative vote to release a redacted version. 

Resident Paul Gregory said the school officials were sworn in in January, and there has been "this floating thing of a report from Pittsfield High School."

"Who cares what's in the report? It's now about process. It's about a promise that was made to the public, paid for by the public, that things would be revealed," he said. 

"I understand redactions for the protection of people, for the protection of some situations, but we have a right to know that is unfinished business."

When Batory yielded the floor, she said this is a "disappointment of disgusting information being hidden from the public."


Tags: investigation,   PHS,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Proposes 2.64 Tax Rate Hike

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The proposed tax rate for fiscal year 2027 is less than 40 cents per $1,000 valuation for residential properties and would increase the average property tax bill by about $146 per year. 

On Tuesday's City Council meeting agenda is a request from the mayor and Board of Assessors to use a residential factor of .8245 at a shift of 1.75, resulting in a residential tax rate of $17.88 and a commercial, industrial, and personal property tax rate of $37.95.

These matters are typically referred to the Committee of the Whole for deliberation. The proposed rates for residential and commercial are 38 cents and $1.05 more, respectively, from FY26. 

The average residential home, valued at $316,792 in FY27, has increased by about $1,500 from the previous fiscal year, and would pay $5,664.24 in yearly taxes.

This is a 2.64 percent, or $145.88, increase. 

The average commercial property worth $239,600 saw a $100 increase in value from the previous fiscal year, and would pay $9,092.82 in yearly taxes. This is a $255.27, or 2.89 percent, increase from the previous fiscal year. 

The FY27 tax levy of $124,468,317 is a $5.3 million increase from the previous year, or 4.45 percent. There is about  $388,000 in excess levy capacity, $2.3 million in new growth, and the levy limit is $124,856,412. 

According to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 11 single-family homes were added to Pittsfield's housing stock this fiscal year, increasing the city's total assessed value by $19,987,600 to $3,592,737,600. 

The city lost five two-family homes in 2027, and that housing type decreased by $3.2 million in assessed value, now worth $384,620,400. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories