No Date for Sweet Brook Union Election

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — It's unlikely that the blocked union vote at Sweet Brook Care Centers will be rescheduled until the National Labor Relations Board completes its investigation into complaints against the nursing homes' management, said union officials.

"They've postponed it. I think what's significant about that is there are many different elections where there are charges but [the elections] still go forward," said 1199SEIU Executive Vice President Michael Fadel last week. "In a small number of cases, the board makes a decision not to ... that there can only be a free and untainted election, pending the resolution of those complaints."

Workers at Sweet Brook were to vote on whether to organize and join 1199 Service Employees International Union last Thursday. The union's lawyers, however, requested in a hand-delivered letter to Labor Board Regional Director Rosemary Pye last Monday that the election be halted because "[the employer] has destroyed any possibility of employees making a free choice in the election."

Related Stories
Labor Board Says Nurses Can Join Union at Sweet Brook

SEIU Slams Health System on N.Y. Lawyers, Lux Hotel

SEIU Rallies to Support Sweet Brook Workers

North Adams Regional Hospital Cuts Staff
The board normally expedites complaints related to blocking elections, but is unclear how fast that would happen.

At issue are allegations that parent corporatioon Northern Berkshire Healthcare and Sweet Brook management have intimidated workers and blocked efforts to disseminate union materials.


An internal e-mail from Nothern Berkshire Healthcare's Vice President of Human Resources Arthur Scott discussing how the health system responds to unfair labor complaints infuriated union officials.

Scott wrote to the executive team that he believed there was a legitimate defense to decisions made by the health care system and that "because the NLRB process is so lengthy and the potential penalties so minor, I think we should continue with our current practice."

The e-mail does not state what that practice is, but rather explains the Labor Board's decision-making process. Essentially, any ruling against the health system would carry no significant penalties. Fadel called the e-mail "pretty shocking and cavalier."

Health care system officials have stated their primary concern is making sure every employee is fully informed before casting a vote.

"We're very confident that our managers have acted legally and appropriately," said Vice President of External Affairs Dianne Cutillo last week.

SEIU filed a flurry of unfair labor complaints with the Labor Board within days of Scott's e-mail surfacing; an earlier complaint dated Feb. 27 claims the organizers were not allowed to distribute or post union materials. NBH, meanwhile, has appealed an earlier ruling by the Labor Board's Region 1 over which workers are qualified to vote.

Fadel said the vote was delayed but the organizing committee was "very active." "From our perspective, they are a union, they are working together to want to make conditins better at the home."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee OKs Updated Policy on Seclusion, Restraint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee recently approved an updated policy on time-outs, seclusion and the physical restraint of students.
 
The policy is based on updated state regulations that came down last winter. Superintendent Joseph Bergeron told the panel at its August meeting that his office waited on recommendations from the Massachusetts Association of School Committees that were released in May and ran the proposed changes past the district's legal counsel.
 
That timing — and an expectation from the commonwealth that districts have the updated policy in place for the start of the 2026-27 academic year — led to an expedited process for the School Committee, which did not do a first read with a vote at a subsequent meeting as is its practice.
 
"Policy JKAA speaks to the ways the school district and our procedures shall abide by the updated state regulations," Bergeron said. "We're not going to have a lot of leeway.
 
"Nothing about the way we interact with our students on a day-to-day basis is being shifted by this."
 
For example, the commonwealth does not allow schools to use "seclusion," or, "the involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room or area, with or without adult supervision," except some extreme cases, like when, "when student behavior poses an imminent threat of assault, or imminent serious physical harm to self or others, but only if safeguards are accounted for," the updated policy reads.
 
"From the state's perspective and my perspective, the idea of locking a child in a room without adult supervision is something we've never done," Bergeron said. "And it's something the state wants to make explicitly that nobody ever does."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories