Mount Greylock School Committee Delays Cost-Share Vote

By Patrick RonaniBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee pushed back its vote on the proposed shared-administrative agreement Tuesday night, following more changes to the language in the contract.

The agreement, which would help share administrative costs between the district and School Union 71, will now be voted on by the committee on Monday night.

"We made a bunch of wordsmith changes, and we want to see the next agreement before we vote," Committee Chairman David Archibald said. "We didn't change the context, we changed the wording. They were relatively minor, but when you try to wordsmith by committee, it can take awhile."

Archibald said one of the revisions pertained to the legal basis of retirement plans for cost-sharing employees.

"We're making word changes that make our contract clearer," he added.

The district's legal counsel, Fred Dupere, provided assistance in scripting the draft and was a strong proponent of the vote being delayed. While the consensus was that a revised contract should be viewed before a vote takes place, there was a sense of urgency within the committee.

David Langston, who on May 1 was the single 'no' vote to continue discussion of the agreement and who sought a longer time line, on Tuesday expressed concerns in delaying the vote too long.

"We can't wait forever to get this result," Langston said Tuesday night. "It's suicide."

Archibald agreed that time is of the essence because of the pending retirement of Mount Greylock Superintendent William Travis, whose last day is June 30. If the district votes in favor of the cost-share agreement, then School Union 71, which includes the Williamstown and Lanesborough elementary schools, will vote.

"If too much time passes, we'll have to find an interim superintendent," Archibald said.

In other business Tuesday night, the committee agreed to carry Mount Greylock's budget proposal to the Lanesborough town meeting in June. The decision comes a week after Lanesborough's Finance Committee approved, in its budget, an assessment $60,000 short of what the school had originally negotiated. Lanesborough is having a difficult financial year.

Archibald says he'll ask to speak at both the Williamstown and Lanesborough town meetings, and he'll stress the importance of town aid in response to the significant drop in state aid for the 2011 fiscal year.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

AG Clears Williamstown Select Board in Open Meeting Complaint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Attorney General's Office on Wednesday cleared the Select Board in an Open Meeting Law complaint filed by iBerkshires.com while simultaneously confirming the supposition at the heart of the complaint.
 
The AGO found that the board did technically violate the OML when it moved to executive session on May 11, a misstep the board previously acknowledged in its response to the complaint.
 
The meeting in question was held behind closed doors to discuss the town's response to a proposal from Williams College to acquire the former town garage site at 59 Water St.
 
At the time of the May 11 meeting, the board had held no public discussion, let alone a vote, on whether to enter into negotiations with Williams, the lone respondent to a request for proposals issued by the town for the 1.27-acre parcel.
 
The board cited an exception to the Open Meeting Law that states executive sessions are appropriate if, "holding the discussion in open session may have a detrimental effect on the Board's negotiating position."
 
iBerkshires.com maintained in its complaint that the executive session was premature given the fact that the board on May 11 had no one to negotiate with as it had not agreed — publicly — to negotiate with the college.
 
The news organization cited the fact that the town's RFP clearly indicated a multi-step process in which the board first would decide whether to engage with any of the respondents (assuming multiple bids were made) and then enter into negotiation with one of the respondents.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories