image description
Charlie LaBatt, an engineer with Guntlow and Associates, explains the construction plans to the Zoning Board of Appeals but the board wants more specifics.

ZBA Slows Williamstown Youth Center Permitting

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Drainage took center stage at the Youth Center's special permit hearing and engineers will have to return next month with more specific plans.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Building a new Youth Center hit its first stumbling block Thursday when the Zoning Board of Appeals continued the special permit hearing for another month.

The hearing was suspended because the board had concerns over water drainage, construction worker parking and the hours of construction.

The center's engineering firm will have to readdress those issues. Project engineer Charlie LaBatt said it would not delay the construction.

The biggest issue was drainage; particularly with a pipe that drains water from the south parking lot to the western part of Chris Winter's property on Church Street.

Winters said that there were no drainage issues before the new school was built, but that the land around the pipes have been eroding since.

"I think [the plan] can be better," Winters said.

A drainage pipe on the east of his land is set to be repaired by the town but the west still poses a problem.

LaBatt, an engineer with Guntlow Associates who is planning the project, said while the plans increase the volume,  other improvements will make the drainage flow neutral. Winter's concern was addressed somewhat by LaBatt redesigning some drainage to School Street after last week's Planning Board meeting.

"I'm trying to make it neutral in all ways," LaBatt said.



Related Stories


Williamstown Youth Center Location Chosen

Williamstown to Decide On Youth Center

Williamstown School, Youth Center Seeks Town Input


Williamstown Debates Elementary School Playground

Williamstown Youth Center To Break Ground This Fall

The drainage was supposed to remain the same when the new school was built but improving the infrastructure made the system more efficient, LaBatt said.

The board felt the problem should be addressed but also said it was unfair to make the youth center pay for the school's problems. A fair agreement is hoped to be reached at the next meeting.

"I think we need to do something to address Mr. Winter's concerns," Chairman Andrew Hoar said.

Additionally, the board debated if it actually had the authority to demand the upgrades.

While the youth center is a new construction, the board is actually amending the special permit for the school. The center needs to amend the special permit issued to the elementary school in regards to impervious surfaces. Because of the zoning district, only 15 percent of the total land can be impervious without a special permit. Currently 27 percent of the land is impervious and that percentage will increase with the Youth Center.

LaBatt said he could likely find a way to eliminate additional volume to that drain, but it would increase the volumes to other drains. Fixing the entire problem will come at added expenses to the Youth Center.

The board sent the engineers back to the drawing board to readdress the drainage as best as the firm could, and to create a runoff plan for the construction period – which is mandated in the new bylaws.

The board also wanted more specifics about parking for the construction workers. The workers will not be using the parking lots but instead parking in the fields by the construction site, LaBatt said. If there is not sufficient room, a shuttle will be used to bring the workers to the site.

The board requested more exact figures on the number of workers and vehicles and if a shuttle system is needed.

The board also recommended specific hours for the construction work. According to LaBatt the construction is expected to take six months after an October groundbreaking. The board voiced concerns about the safety of the students and noise.

LaBatt said he expected workers to be on the property from 7:30 a.m. until 3:30 p.m., but the board wanted specific, set hours, suggesting 7 a.m. until 5 p.m.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories